Jump to content
TBoneTX

All Things Coronavirus (Part 2)

 Share

2,372 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Country: Guyana
Timeline
10 hours ago, LIBrty4all said:

Ok, now that the numbers have been updated, I'll call out this headline as #fakenews.  The day that claim FL had 901 deaths (Aug 26th), there were actually EIGHT deaths.

 

https://ycharts.com/indicators/florida_coronavirus_deaths_per_day  

 

And as can be seen from this page, the highest single-day death toll in the past two months is 219 on August 9th.

 

More fear-mongering by the MSM.

@Lemonslice laughs at my post, obviously mocking it, yet contributes nothing to the conversation.  Why is that?

Edited by LIBrty4all
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Country: Guyana
Timeline
Quote

Why are the most vaccinated countries having the highest death rate?

The University of Oxford maintains a public database which allows you to run your own queries.  One clear statistic is that countries that are highly vaccinated have the worst death rates.  The death rate is far more revealing than the case rate, which is not a reliable number, particularly since the PCR test has been discredited and even had it’s FDA EUA revoked.

Paradoxically, a densely populated country like India, which has very low vaccination rates, has the lowest death rate.  What could possibly be the cause?

 

https://mymedicalfreedom.org/the-more-vaccinated-countries-have-a-higher-death-rate/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, LIBrty4all said:

Ok, now that the numbers have been updated, I'll call out this headline as #fakenews.  The day that claim FL had 901 deaths (Aug 26th), there were actually EIGHT deaths.

 

https://ycharts.com/indicators/florida_coronavirus_deaths_per_day  

 

And as can be seen from this page, the highest single-day death toll in the past two months is 219 on August 9th.

 

More fear-mongering by the MSM.

MSM are businesses so of course they will present info in a way that helps make them  money.  Anyways, Ycharts says the source is CDC.  CDC Covid tracker footnotes says:

 

"Please note that this information is confirmed and up-to-date as of August 26, 2021. Jurisdictional reporting methods are subject to change and will be updated on a weekly basis.

CDC’s overall COVID-19 case and death numbers are validated through a confirmation process with each jurisdiction. COVID-19 case and death numbers reported on other websites may differ from what is posted on the CDC COVID Data Tracker due to the timing of reporting and COVID Data Tracker updates, which may differ by up to 24 hours. CDC COVID-19 counts from previous dates may be continually revised as more records are received and processed. Not all jurisdictions report counts daily; some counts are reported in batches and may increase COVID-19 case and death counts at different intervals and appear as spikes. The process used for finding and confirming COVID-19 cases and deaths displayed by other sites may differ."

 

My county commissioner in PA explained the difference between the numbers that the state reported and the county.  The county was deduping addresses and checking addresses were actually in the county.  State wasn't.  Not familiar with Coronavirus data collection procedures in Florida.  But you may want to check local sources first.

Edited by wagner17
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That website makes me so sad. Of course the vaccines don't offer 100% protection from death or serious illness, but it's pretty close. Each of those deaths was, statistically speaking, probably avoidable. The two people I lost last year didn't have the luxury of turning down a vaccine. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posts mislead on Israel vaccine data

By The Associated PressJuly 22, 2021
 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Country: Guyana
Timeline
7 hours ago, laylalex said:

That website makes me so sad. Of course the vaccines don't offer 100% protection from death or serious illness, but it's pretty close. Each of those deaths was, statistically speaking, probably avoidable. The two people I lost last year didn't have the luxury of turning down a vaccine. 

The Pfizer-BioNTech drug offers 95% protection.  But only for 7 days, as per the study.  After that, I am sure it drops off, but that information isn't in the pamphlet.

 

That means that after jab #2, 5% of test subjects got infected with covid within 7 days.

Edited by LIBrty4all
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Country: Guyana
Timeline

 

Quote



https://mymedicalfreedom.org/topics/pcr-testing/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean, this is an arresting headline:

Kary Mullis, inventor of the PCR test explains why covid testing using PCR is flawed

But Kary Mullis died before COVID19 was a thing. And he was talking about HIV which is not COVID? And Mullis very wrongly believed that HIV did not cause AIDS. I know who Mullis is. He did win the Nobel Prize for inventing the PCR technique, but why would we trust someone who was dead before COVID even had sprung into being to have a reliable opinion on PCR testing detecting COVID? :huh:

 

Also:

Quote

 

Social media users have been sharing a quote attributed to the inventor of the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) test, currently being used to detect COVID-19, which says “PCR tests cannot detect free infectious viruses at all”. This quote appears not to be a direct quote from the inventor, Kary Mullis, has lost some context and does not mean COVID-19 testing is fraudulent, as suggested by some social media posts.

...

However, the quote is actually from an article written by John Lauritsen in December 1996 about HIV and AIDS, not COVID-19 (here).

The context around the quote shows Lauritsen is not saying PCR tests do not work. Instead, he is clarifying that PCR identifies substances qualitatively not quantitatively, detecting the genetic sequences of viruses, but not the viruses themselves: “PCR is intended to identify substances qualitatively, but by its very nature is unsuited for estimating numbers. Although there is a common misimpression that the viral load tests actually count the number of viruses in the blood, these tests cannot detect free, infectious viruses at all; they can only detect proteins that are believed, in some cases wrongly, to be unique to HIV. The tests can detect genetic sequences of viruses, but not viruses themselves.”

 

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-pcr/fact-check-inventor-of-method-used-to-test-for-covid-19-didnt-say-it-cant-be-used-in-virus-detection-idUSKBN24420X

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Country: Guyana
Timeline
34 minutes ago, laylalex said:

I mean, this is an arresting headline:

Kary Mullis, inventor of the PCR test explains why covid testing using PCR is flawed

But Kary Mullis died before COVID19 was a thing. And he was talking about HIV which is not COVID? And Mullis very wrongly believed that HIV did not cause AIDS. I know who Mullis is. He did win the Nobel Prize for inventing the PCR technique, but why would we trust someone who was dead before COVID even had sprung into being to have a reliable opinion on PCR testing detecting COVID? :huh:

 

Also:

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-pcr/fact-check-inventor-of-method-used-to-test-for-covid-19-didnt-say-it-cant-be-used-in-virus-detection-idUSKBN24420X

 

 

As detailed in the headlined post you quoted (not me), Yes, he died before covid.  Doesn't take away from the facts of what he said.  Even Fauci admitted that the PCR test will ALWAYS find covid in a person if the Ct is over 35, which was the norm for all of 2020.  Then, when people began to be vaccinated earlier this year, and there were a large number of them turning up positive for covid, the CDC lowered the Ct to a max of 28.

Which means that the majority of tests last year that raised the covid case counts so high were false positives.

 

Obviously you didn't watch his video.  The key takeaway is "It [PCR test] allows you to take a very minuscule amount of anything and make it measurable... it's a sort of misinterpretation".  And he didn't say the HIV virus doesn't exist, he said it was rare in Americans (1 mil out of 300 mil) who have it.

 

Why do you suppose the CDC has determined that the PCR test will no longer be used?  It is inaccurate.  As are all those hyper-inflated numbers you read about in the MSM.  Hopefully a new, more accurate test can be found.  Or just tone down the Ct of the PCR to around 25 so it is more accurate.  

 

 

 

"What PCR does is to select a genetic sequence and then amplify it enormously. It can accomplish the equivalent of finding a needle in a haystack; it can amplify that needle into a haystack. Like an electronically amplified antenna, PCR greatly amplifies the signal, but it also greatly amplifies the noise. Since the amplification is exponential, the slightest error in measurement, the slightest contamination, can result in errors of many orders of magnitude. 

 

To make an analogy: using the viral load tests to gauge viral activity would be like finding a few fingernail clippings; amplifying the fingernail clippings into a small mountain of fingernail clippings mixed in with other junk; and then having an "expert" come along and interpret the pile as representing a platoon of soldiers, fully armed and ready for battle.

 

In short, the viral load tests are a scam. When molecular biologists Peter Duesberg and Harvey Bialy analyzed the 1995 Ho and Wei papers (Nature 373) that launched the whole viral load bandwagon, they found that estimates of free virus had been overestimated by several orders of magnitude. In the Wei study, 100,000 so-called "plasma viral RNA" units really amounted to less than 2 infectious viruses per milliliter of plasma. And in the Ho study, 10,000 "plasma virions" corresponded to less than one infectious virus. Duesberg and Bialy concluded, "there is no evidence for infectious virus in Wei et al.'s and Ho et al.'s patients." (Duesberg 1996a)"

Edited by LIBrty4all
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Country: Guyana
Timeline

I think someone right here in CEHST has mentioned that most of the exhaled breath escapes around a mask.  And now for the rest of the story....

 

Quote

The study showed that most common masks, primarily due to problems with fit, filter about 10 per cent of exhaled aerosol droplets. The remaining aerosols are redirected, mostly out the top of the mask where it fits over the nose, and escape into the ambient air unfiltered.

 

https://uwaterloo.ca/news/media/study-supports-widespread-use-better-masks-curb-covid-19

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Um, what about the CDC not using the PCR test anymore? Didn't we already dismiss that nonsense pages and pages ago? 

 

I know that video. I watched it a long time ago. HIV and COVID are not the same thing. He is dead and there is no way of knowing he'd actually endorse an interpretation being posthumously shoved in his mouth.

 

What happened to the post where you just posted "dog ###"? I got an email notification. Was that in response to what I wrote? Why did you write that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Country: Guyana
Timeline
33 minutes ago, laylalex said:

Um, what about the CDC not using the PCR test anymore? Didn't we already dismiss that nonsense pages and pages ago? 

 

I know that video. I watched it a long time ago. HIV and COVID are not the same thing. He is dead and there is no way of knowing he'd actually endorse an interpretation being posthumously shoved in his mouth.

 

What happened to the post where you just posted "dog ###"? I got an email notification. Was that in response to what I wrote? Why did you write that?

Perhaps YOU dismissed it.  The rest of the world has not.

 

Glad you understand that HIV and covid are different.   But what he said about his own test has not changed, still remains true 28 years later.

Not required to answer.

Edited by LIBrty4all
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

This is a Moderation reminder that other members' opinions, whether or not we agree with them, are to be respected.  If they violate the Terms of Service, report them.  This includes badgering of other members.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
On 8/28/2021 at 12:46 PM, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

What's the risk of indoor dining if you're fully vaccinated? Here's what one expert says

https://www.cnn.com/2021/08/28/health/vaccine-safe-activities-dr-wen-wellness/index.html

So we wear a mask when we enter the door to a restaurant, wear it while walking the distance to a table, then once we are all seated, we can take them off as it is now a Covid19 safe zone.  Of course if you get up to use the restroom, get that mask back on as Covid is swirling all over the building except for where one is sitting.  The whole masking thing at resturants made no sense at all to me, and studies I have read show little to no "super-spreading" events from restaurants or bars even with all those maskless people sitting at their tables.

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...