Biden wins presidency, Trump denied second term in White House, Fox News projects

[Ban Hammer 13,343]

so you're talking about something other than what i was talking about.   carry on.

[abum 324]

4 hours ago, Ban Hammer said:

yet not one negative word about the 9,626 vote error, or that the error had been signed off on by two official counters?

 

ado do share what's the point of this? apart from it was an error? nothing significant related to the "shenanigan's" claim?

[Ban Hammer 13,343]

5 minutes ago, abum said:

 

ado do share what's the point of this? apart from it was an error? nothing significant related to the "shenanigan's" claim?

rather large error, i'd say.  but carry on.

[abum 324]

6 minutes ago, Ban Hammer said:

rather large error, i'd say.  but carry on.

okay then, sad that GA Sec of State (a Republican) did not act on that error and Trump team did not sue the state, to overturn the result. 

 

 

[Steeleballz 7,550]

7 minutes ago, Ban Hammer said:

rather large error, i'd say.  but carry on.

 

  It was huge. If they didn't catch that,  Biden would have won 306-232 instead of 306-232. Fortunately the built in checks and balances work, they caught it, and in the end, we are ultimately seeing a 306-232 margin.

[Prizm123 1,086]

2 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

 

  It was huge. If they didn't catch that,  Biden would have won 306-232 instead of 306-232. Fortunately the built in checks and balances work, they caught it, and in the end, we are ultimately seeing a 306-232 margin.

isnt that considered a landslide?

 

[Ban Hammer 13,343]

2 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

 

  It was huge. If they didn't catch that,  Biden would have won 306-232 instead of 306-232. Fortunately the built in checks and balances work, they caught it, and in the end, we are ultimately seeing a 306-232 margin.

i like the voting results to be like my guns at the range:  accurate.

[abum 324]

1 minute ago, Prizm123 said:

isnt that considered a landslide?

 

 

LANDSLIDEEEEEEEEEE!!!

 

 

[abum 324]

2 minutes ago, Ban Hammer said:

i like the voting results to be like my guns at the range:  accurate.

 

probably a good time to read about statistics, margin of error and variance. might be useful in the future and upcoming elections. 

[Ban Hammer 13,343]

2 minutes ago, abum said:

 

probably a good time to read about statistics, margin of error and variance. might be useful in the future and upcoming elections. 

yeah, because that has so much to do with the election. 
 

[Crtcl Rice Theory 2,432]

9 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

 

  It was huge. If they didn't catch that,  Biden would have won 306-232 instead of 306-232. Fortunately the built in checks and balances work, they caught it, and in the end, we are ultimately seeing a 306-232 margin.

No, it was Yhuuge. 

[Steeleballz 7,550]

3 minutes ago, Ban Hammer said:

i like the voting results to be like my guns at the range:  accurate.

 

   You might want to channel that energy in a different direction then.

 

  The system of checks and balances for correcting mistakes with voting issues works a hell of a lot better than the one for correcting mistakes made with firearms.

[Ban Hammer 13,343]

3 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

 

   You might want to channel that energy in a different direction then.

 

  The system of checks and balances for correcting mistakes with voting issues works a hell of a lot better than the one for correcting mistakes made with firearms.

i'll take a hard pass on that, dr freud.

[Prizm123 1,086]

speaking of shooting things.....we appear to be bringing back firing squads 🤣

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/08/05/2020-15039/manner-of-federal-executions

[Ban Hammer 13,343]

10 minutes ago, Prizm123 said:

speaking of shooting things.....we appear to be bringing back firing squads 🤣

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/08/05/2020-15039/manner-of-federal-executions

i guess hanging is still out.