Biden wins presidency, Trump denied second term in White House, Fox News projects

[Ban Hammer 13,344]

16 minutes ago, abum said:

 

yet not one negative word about the 9,626 vote error, or that the error had been signed off on by two official counters?

Edited November 25, 2020 by Ban Hammer

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

2 minutes ago, moxy said:

Oh come on. So because the defense had access to the information, it suddenly was locked away from the Attorney General? And because the MSM didn't follow up on it, Barr couldn't prosecute? This is hand-waving and weak. If there had been evidence of a crime, it would be prosecuted. As I've said, there is no evidence. Stop making it sound like there was.

No evidence? Why don't you do any kind of objective research because I provided you with direct links to the data presented. 

 

[moxy 1,051]

4 minutes ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

No evidence? Why don't you do any kind of objective research because I provided you with direct links to the data presented. 

 

Does the AG not have access to evidence of criminal activity in the link you provided?

 

If there is evidence of a crime, it's news to the Trump appointed AG because he is not prosecuting.

[Prizm123 1,086]

doesnt matter what media says in matters like this. if you have evidence, present it to the court and see if it is enough to warrant conviction.

the statute of limitations had not expired.

if this evidence of wrongdoing is of any substance, there should have been investigations and trials.

 

i would expect that of anyone regardless of affiliation.

 

[Crtcl Rice Theory 2,432]

3 minutes ago, Dashinka said:

Yep, she wasn't prosecuted even with the huge amount of evidence against her.

I'll bite  What evidence?

 

3 minutes ago, Dashinka said:

 

 

  The same happened for Obama and Biden. 

Are you trying to say there is evidence of criminal behavior? Who told you, Rudy?  Judicial Watch?

Anyone can talk, what evidence do you have. 

 

My question is 98% rhetorical, because there is no evidence to back up your assertion.

 

 

3 minutes ago, Dashinka said:

 

 

The elite in this country, and particularly the Dem elite are treated much differently then the common person. 

It is not news that people with means and connections have better treatment inside and outside the courts.  This is not an issue unique to one party.  This condition got worse under Trump, not better.

 

3 minutes ago, Dashinka said:

 

But now we get the Dems are screaming lock him up, execute him and his entire family.  Can you see the double standard, or is it simply that if you agree with one side, they must be right? 

You see party members calling for execution? 

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

1 minute ago, moxy said:

Does the AG not have access to evidence of criminal activity in the link you provided?

 

If there is evidence of a crime, it's news to the Trump appointed AG because he is not prosecuting.

So why are you putting the onus on me to try and decipher why the AG is not doing anything when it has come in public that this is what happened?

[moxy 1,051]

8 minutes ago, Ban Hammer said:

yet not one negative word about the 9,626 vote error, or that the error had been signed off on by two official counters?

Debunked. There was an error during the recount, that error was caught and fixed.

[moxy 1,051]

1 minute ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

So why are you putting the onus on me to try and decipher why the AG is not doing anything when it has come in public that this is what happened?

The only onus I'm putting on you is to stop spreading disinformation. You insist there was evidence of a crime. If there's one thing I can safely say about AG Barr, it's that he would love for nothing more than to go after a big prize like Barack Obama. And yet he has done nothing because there is no evidence. If the "evidence" in the link you provided was factual, I have zero doubt it would have made its way to the AG's desk by now.

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

4 minutes ago, CanAm1980 said:

I'll bite  What evidence?

As someone who has a security clearance now for almost 17 of the last 20 years. I can tell you that if anybody and I mean anybody did half of what she did they would have locked you up and thrown away the key.

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

1 minute ago, moxy said:

The only onus I'm putting on you is to stop spreading disinformation. You insist there was evidence of a crime. If there's one thing I can safely say about AG Barr, it's that he would love for nothing more than to go after a big prize like Barack Obama. And yet he has done nothing because there is no evidence. If the "evidence" in the link you provided was factual, I have zero doubt it would have made its way to the AG's desk by now.

ok, so you are accusing me of spreading disinformation now, just like Hunter's laptop was disinformation? All of the information I am talking about is not conspiracy because it is out there for the public to view. 

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/05/19/michael-flynn-full-susan-rice-email-sent-on-trumps-inauguration-day-267998

[Crtcl Rice Theory 2,432]

5 minutes ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

As someone who has a security clearance now for almost 17 of the last 20 years. I can tell you that if anybody and I mean anybody did half of what she did they would have locked you up and thrown away the key.

But you don't have evidence. 

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

4 minutes ago, CanAm1980 said:

But you don't have evidence. 

There is tons of evidence out there that the FBI has but they never did anything with it. I just think that they did because of how connected she is. 

 

 

Edit... You following me now? lol

Edited November 25, 2020 by Cyberfx1024

[laylalex 7,285]

But "evidence" doesn't mean something happened definitively. I mean, a lot of what we think of as "evidence" isn't going to be admitted because there's some problem with it. Like it's hearsay, or there's a chain of custody issue. Or there needs to be more evidence to prove a gun is actually smoking instead of "well it looks like it was fired." We aren't the courts and for very good reasons, imo.

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

1 minute ago, laylalex said:

But "evidence" doesn't mean something happened definitively. I mean, a lot of what we think of as "evidence" isn't going to be admitted because there's some problem with it. Like it's hearsay, or there's a chain of custody issue. Or there needs to be more evidence to prove a gun is actually smoking instead of "well it looks like it was fired." We aren't the courts and for very good reasons, imo.

That's the thing though the Clinton's staff physically destroyed the evidence. 

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

1 hour ago, moxy said:

Ok, let me climb out of my bubble and assume the Obama crime syndicate was spying on the Trump campaign. Why hasn't it been prosecuted? Why did no congressional investigations reach this conclusion? Is AG Barr really so helpless against a Democratic Party that is almost completely out of power that he is unable to prosecute what should be a slam dunk criminal case?

Why hasn't spying on a political rival's campaign among other things (e.g. running counterintelligence operations) been prosecuted by these bureaus like the DOJ/FBI? Because they were part of it.

 

So if they were going to prosecute anyone in the Obama administration, assuming they could, they'd need to prosecute their own too. If the near two decades of being a voting adult has taught me anything, it's no one in any high level position takes responsibility for a single thing, regardless of party. Otherwise, you'd have seen an amazing perp walk during the Bush administration for Iraq alone. Fabricating "intelligence" as a method of repeatedly abusing power against a Presidential campaign, President-elect, and sitting President is a pretty hostile act against the Republic itself.