Jump to content
Orangesapples

Biden wins presidency, Trump denied second term in White House, Fox News projects

 Share

2,025 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

I dont hate anyone here. We are linked together by marrying someone outside of the United States. We have something in common. I also  love this country. I love the military too, and law enforcement. My friend from high school is a deputy sheriff in Seattle, and I love him too. I could hate law enforcement, because when I came back from Southwest Asia I became a drug addict for a long time, and was incarcerated because of that. But my friend from high school, the deputy sheriff, is a human being, my friend. I also love the military, probably because I was in the military myself, and my wife is in the military. I also believe this is the greatest country on earth. We try hard to get things right,  for the most part. I believe in security of borders. I don't think I should allow just anyone into my house. That would be dangerous for my wife, my son, and myself. And I feel the same way about our country. I cant just sit back and allow just anyone into this country. And do you know how many races there are?? There is one race. The human race. My wife is Chines, Filipino and Spanish. I am German and Dutch. Our son is Filipino, Chinese,  Spanish, Dutch and German. Am I a racist and an unbeliever in equal rights and treatment when I love them so much?  We here share more in common than we dont  share. But we dont always agree on the politics of things. I am afraid of our country being fundamentally changed, into a socialist /communist country. I will always stand against that. And I also will stand against an illegal election,  where I feel certain fraud has occurred

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, CanAm1980 said:

What Whitehouse attorneys? What investigation? 

I see Trump campaign attorneys and some RNC representation bringing actions before a variety courts.  That is not an investigation. Those are not government attorneys.

 

anyone can follow the court cases and the legal experts as well as law journals, anyone can look up the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as well as any applicable state rules, anyone can look at the rulings as filed by the court.

i know I and several others read the actual filings and the rulings as they come available.

 

oh here we go, finally a motion to sanction for that mess in wayne county the other day

https://lawandcrime.com/2020-election/detroit-seeks-sanctions-blasts-trump-campaign-for-using-court-filing-to-spread-disinformation/

 

https://lawandcrime.com/2020-election/arizona-judge-throws-out-republican-party-attempt-to-delay-certification-of-vote-in-maricopa-county/

dismissed with prejudice, meaning the defendants would be eligible to have legal fees paid by the plaintiffs

 

Edited by Prizm123

RoC sent 10/30/21

NOA 11/16/21

Check Cashed 11/18/21

Biometrics Waived 01/19/2022

 

 

Beware the fury of a patient man.- John Dryden

Political attempts to require that others share your personal truths are, in their limit, dictatorships.- Neil deGrasse Tyson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

apparently some people dont think its actually dye.

its kinda fits the overall look though

RoC sent 10/30/21

NOA 11/16/21

Check Cashed 11/18/21

Biometrics Waived 01/19/2022

 

 

Beware the fury of a patient man.- John Dryden

Political attempts to require that others share your personal truths are, in their limit, dictatorships.- Neil deGrasse Tyson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, CanAm1980 said:

3319.jpg?width=1200&height=1200&quality=

So, your shallow question is based on a warped physical  appearance? I sure am interested in your opinion of Abraham Lincoln.  That will be revealing 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Prizm123 said:

apparently some people dont think its actually dye.

its kinda fits the overall look though

And you base credentials on personal physical appearances? Shame on you, oh Democrat,  for being so shallow. Picking at a person's appearance for a political attack? How is that right? Tell me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, JoBri said:

And you base credentials on personal physical appearances? Shame on you, oh Democrat,  for being so shallow. Picking at a person's appearance for a political attack? How is that right? Tell me

No, you wont apologize for being so shallow, nor such a hypocrite per your superficial party. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
35 minutes ago, JoBri said:

So, your shallow question is based on a warped physical  appearance? I sure am interested in your opinion of Abraham Lincoln.  That will be revealing 

What shallow question? I posted a picture of Rudy, who is not in the same legal, intellectual or moral class as Lincoln. Why sully Lincoln's memory by comparing him to Rudy? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
1 hour ago, Prizm123 said:

 

anyone can follow the court cases and the legal experts as well as law journals, anyone can look up the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as well as any applicable state rules, anyone can look at the rulings as filed by the court.

i know I and several others read the actual filings and the rulings as they come available.

 

oh here we go, finally a motion to sanction for that mess in wayne county the other day

https://lawandcrime.com/2020-election/detroit-seeks-sanctions-blasts-trump-campaign-for-using-court-filing-to-spread-disinformation/

 

https://lawandcrime.com/2020-election/arizona-judge-throws-out-republican-party-attempt-to-delay-certification-of-vote-in-maricopa-county/

dismissed with prejudice, meaning the defendants would be eligible to have legal fees paid by the plaintiffs

 

Dismissed with prejudice! I am not a lawyer but even I know that means "don't bring this subject up in court again, ever"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, CanAm1980 said:

What shallow question? I posted a picture of Rudy, who is not in the same legal, intellectual or moral class as Lincoln. Why sully Lincoln's memory by comparing him to Rudy? 

 

Ha! What a joke that is

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
1 minute ago, JoBri said:

Ha! What a joke that is

That's what I thought when you compared Lincoln to Rudy, I suppose you will compare Lincoln to Trump next.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, TBoneTX said:

The fact remains that Dominion (the voting-machine outfit in Toronto, responsible for the machines in 33 U.S, states) is NOT standing up for its equipment or the veracity of the results.  The company has hastily closed its office, the executives are scattering like rats, and more than 100 of the 243 employees deleted their LinkedIn pages.  If everything were on the up-and-up, the executives would have calmly (and indignantly) come forth to speak up for themselves.

 

Also if everything were on the level, operatives supporting the apparently winning candidate would not bother to personally threaten or dox certification boards or the opposing side's attorneys.

 

Further if everything were on the level, the apparently winning campaign and every one of its supporters would be welcoming recounts and further looks into vote totals, if for no other reason than to ensure election integrity in the future.  Instead, they're fighting it like wildcats.  Who among them has called for forensic evaluation of the machines that Dominion is running away from supporting?

 

The media in particular are incurious and dismissive, whereas in past years their genuine investigative reporters would have relished a deep dive into the particulars and would have fought to be first to report something meaningful.  However, no one in the mainstream media has examined, let alone questioned, why half a dozen key swing states all stopped counting ballots at approximately the same time, whereupon many thousands of ballots began appearing, all favoring one candidate, and many with no mark for any down-ballot candidate.

 

If this quest were genuinely quixotic, people of the stature of Sidney Powell, Lin Wood, and (yes) Giuliani would not be risking their life's reputations to pursue wild geese.

 

Finally, if the other presidential candidate had been leading in the vote totals like this and even some of the above had occurred, does anyone honestly think that that candidate's side would remain passive or silent and automatically accept results that changed like that?

182K18t.gif

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
6 hours ago, TBoneTX said:

The fact remains that Dominion (the voting-machine outfit in Toronto, responsible for the machines in 33 U.S, states) is NOT standing up for its equipment or the veracity of the results.  The company has hastily closed its office, the executives are scattering like rats, and more than 100 of the 243 employees deleted their LinkedIn pages.  If everything were on the up-and-up, the executives would have calmly (and indignantly) come forth to speak up for themselves.

 

Also if everything were on the level, operatives supporting the apparently winning candidate would not bother to personally threaten or dox certification boards or the opposing side's attorneys.

 

Further if everything were on the level, the apparently winning campaign and every one of its supporters would be welcoming recounts and further looks into vote totals, if for no other reason than to ensure election integrity in the future.  Instead, they're fighting it like wildcats.  Who among them has called for forensic evaluation of the machines that Dominion is running away from supporting?

 

The media in particular are incurious and dismissive, whereas in past years their genuine investigative reporters would have relished a deep dive into the particulars and would have fought to be first to report something meaningful.  However, no one in the mainstream media has examined, let alone questioned, why half a dozen key swing states all stopped counting ballots at approximately the same time, whereupon many thousands of ballots began appearing, all favoring one candidate, and many with no mark for any down-ballot candidate.

 

If this quest were genuinely quixotic, people of the stature of Sidney Powell, Lin Wood, and (yes) Giuliani would not be risking their life's reputations to pursue wild geese.

 

Finally, if the other presidential candidate had been leading in the vote totals like this and even some of the above had occurred, does anyone honestly think that that candidate's side would remain passive or silent and automatically accept results that changed like that?

If you have any doubt about the accuracy of the diamond machines look at one data point: The ballot count by diamond machines  and hand counting in Georgia gave the same results.

 

How could the hand counting match a machine count if there was error or bias?

 

The clock has run out, State certification deadlines are here, time to give up the fantasy.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, TBoneTX said:

The fact remains that Dominion (the voting-machine outfit in Toronto, responsible for the machines in 33 U.S, states) is NOT standing up for its equipment or the veracity of the results.  The company has hastily closed its office, the executives are scattering like rats, and more than 100 of the 243 employees deleted their LinkedIn pages.  If everything were on the up-and-up, the executives would have calmly (and indignantly) come forth to speak up for themselves.

 

Also if everything were on the level, operatives supporting the apparently winning candidate would not bother to personally threaten or dox certification boards or the opposing side's attorneys.

 

Further if everything were on the level, the apparently winning campaign and every one of its supporters would be welcoming recounts and further looks into vote totals, if for no other reason than to ensure election integrity in the future.  Instead, they're fighting it like wildcats.  Who among them has called for forensic evaluation of the machines that Dominion is running away from supporting?

 

The media in particular are incurious and dismissive, whereas in past years their genuine investigative reporters would have relished a deep dive into the particulars and would have fought to be first to report something meaningful.  However, no one in the mainstream media has examined, let alone questioned, why half a dozen key swing states all stopped counting ballots at approximately the same time, whereupon many thousands of ballots began appearing, all favoring one candidate, and many with no mark for any down-ballot candidate.

 

If this quest were genuinely quixotic, people of the stature of Sidney Powell, Lin Wood, and (yes) Giuliani would not be risking their life's reputations to pursue wild geese.

 

Finally, if the other presidential candidate had been leading in the vote totals like this and even some of the above had occurred, does anyone honestly think that that candidate's side would remain passive or silent and automatically accept results that changed like that?

https://www.dominionvoting.com/

actually, they are standing up for the equipment and the results

this could be why they deleted linkdin profiles

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/dominion-employees-latest-face-threats-harassment-wake-trump/story?id=74288442

 

no one is fighting the recounts, just the false assertions of fraud that have been presented to the courts without evidence.  it is a fact that the plaintiff's attorneys have had to state in court on the pleadings that there are in fact no allegations of fraud. to state otherwise could lead to sanctions and disbarment.

 

the ballot dumps you are referring to were looked into:

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-fact-check-biden-vote-spikes-mi-wi/fact-check-biden-vote-spikes-and-county-recount-do-not-prove-democrats-are-trying-to-steal-the-election-in-michigan-and-wisconsin-idUSKBN27L2RL

 

Sidney Powell and Rudy Giuliani dont have legal reputations worth the paper their law degrees are printed on. Giuliani had not been in a courtroom in 30 years before he made a spectacle of himself in PA.

https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/Oral-Argument-Audio_PA.pdf

the lawyer types seem to agree that since the evidentiary hearing was cancelled, this is going to be thrown out in court as well since those are needed when the case will move forward.

 

in Sidney Powell's case, when Tucker Carlson of all people is stating there is no proof and calling you on your BS, thats pretty funny. Lin Wood got smacked down like a 1st year law student in court for trying to bring up a case that was abrogated and no longer considered good law

Image

 

where it matters, in court, the plaintiffs have not been able to provide the single thing required to change anything. proof. doesnt matter what the media says, doesnt matter what rush says, doesnt matter what people on this board say. just the courts.

Edited by Prizm123

RoC sent 10/30/21

NOA 11/16/21

Check Cashed 11/18/21

Biometrics Waived 01/19/2022

 

 

Beware the fury of a patient man.- John Dryden

Political attempts to require that others share your personal truths are, in their limit, dictatorships.- Neil deGrasse Tyson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...