Biden wins presidency, Trump denied second term in White House, Fox News projects

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

17 minutes ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

Yeah it was shared on FB by someone I knew in HS

So who is pushing the stolen election theory?

What's starting to concern me is this talk about Venezuela and such. There are legitimate concerns being put forward by people on the ground that require attention and time, meanwhile Trump's people are talking about ####### Venezuela and Cuba. I'm hoping they're simply placating a demographic of idiots who just bite at whatever carrot they stick out there to buy time, because if this is an actual argument, this not only goes nowhere but makes a mockery of the tens of thousands of people on the ground doing affidavits (those with material complaints going through BoC, courts, and so on), helping with analysis and verification, etc.

Edited November 20, 2020 by Burnt Reynolds

[abum 324]

4 hours ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

The narrative being put out by the Democrats is that "there is no widespread voter fraud going on". But there keeps being ballots found in GA to the tune of thousands of votes. That has been verified. Not to mention the shenanigans going on in MI and PA that is on record

 

7 minutes ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

Anything election related is disputed right now. So what are you talking about exactly because you lost me. There is a tweet from someone how someone found Trump votes labeled as Biden's which had been back up and verified now in four counties in GA alone in the last week

1. No, NOT ALL election related is disputed.

 

Only claims from Trump camps are disputed - because they are just claims with no evidence. Biden win is also not disputed (you know, that is election related too).

 

2.  You made a comment saying that the narrative of the Dem on Widespread voter fraud, and you made a claim saying ballots found it GA etc - as if you want to dispute the so called narrative of no widespread voter fraud. But then Raffensperger  said no one brought to him any evidence of WIDESPREAD VOTER FRAUD.

 

So tell me where is the WIDESPREAD VOTER FRAUD?

 

If there is no evidence, then the Democrats are telling the truth, NO WIDESPREAD VOTER FRAUD.

 

Even so, how can it overturn the result of the election? especially when Team Trump is pushing for crazy undemocratic measure right now to steal the election. 

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

7 minutes ago, abum said:

 

1. No, NOT ALL election related is disputed.

 

Only claims from Trump camps are disputed - because they are just claims with no evidence. Biden win is also not disputed (you know, that is election related too).

 

2.  You made a comment saying that the narrative of the Dem on Widespread voter fraud, and you made a claim saying ballots found it GA etc - as if you want to dispute the so called narrative of no widespread voter fraud. But then Raffensperger  said no one brought to him any evidence of WIDESPREAD VOTER FRAUD.

 

So tell me where is the WIDESPREAD VOTER FRAUD?

 

If there is no evidence, then the Democrats are telling the truth, NO WIDESPREAD VOTER FRAUD.

 

Even so, how can it overturn the result of the election? especially when Team Trump is pushing for crazy undemocratic measure right now to steal the election. 

You just admitted that there were thousands of ballots found and switched, and then saying that there is "no widespread voter fraud". So you don't think thousands of ballots is widespread?

[abum 324]

1 minute ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

You just admitted that there were thousands of ballots found and switched, and then saying that there is "no widespread voter fraud". So you don't think thousands of ballots is widespread?

 

i did not admit to that - that was your claim.

 

In any case. was that in GA? if yes, any statement from the GA Sec of State saying anything about that as well as the WIDESPREAD VOTER fraud? 

[Prizm123 1,086]

no ballots were switched, it was a human error during the audit and quickly rectified. its basically a nonissue and that guy on twitter is blowing things out of proportion trying to  say this is why an audit was needed although this happened... because of the audit. he didnt even really say it was fraud.

 

its just standard partisan hyperbole. i didnt read much into it after i looked into it.

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

14 minutes ago, Prizm123 said:

no ballots were switched, it was a human error during the audit and quickly rectified. its basically a nonissue and that guy on twitter is blowing things out of proportion trying to  say this is why an audit was needed although this happened... because of the audit. he didnt even really say it was fraud.

 

its just standard partisan hyperbole. i didnt read much into it after i looked into it.

Right....

[Steeleballz 7,550]

57 minutes ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

 

So who is pushing the stolen election theory?

 

  Whoever is buying into the conspiracy you quoted talking about watermark and block chain. Looks like it started with Steve Piekzenic and Infowars.

[abum 324]

22 minutes ago, Prizm123 said:

no ballots were switched, it was a human error during the audit and quickly rectified. its basically a nonissue and that guy on twitter is blowing things out of proportion trying to  say this is why an audit was needed although this happened... because of the audit. he didnt even really say it was fraud.

 

its just standard partisan hyperbole. i didnt read much into it after i looked into it.

 

Gabriel Sterling, and Brad Raffensperger , both are republicans. They did not mention anything about WIDESPREAD FRAUD. 

Somehow those who made such claims failed to bring evidence to either Sec of State or to the court.........................

 

And yet, happily sharing tweets making baseless claims. 

[Steeleballz 7,550]

41 minutes ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

You just admitted that there were thousands of ballots found and switched, and then saying that there is "no widespread voter fraud". So you don't think thousands of ballots is widespread?

 

    Do you understand the definition of voter fraud? You are not using the term correctly, which really hinders any attempt at discussion. Software glitches and human error that are later corrected are not "voter fraud". 

[Prizm123 1,086]

20 minutes ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

Right....

i am glad you agree

[abum 324]

3 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

 

    Do you understand the definition of voter fraud? You are not using the term correctly, which really hinders any attempt at discussion. Software glitches and human error that are later corrected are not "voter fraud". 

 

now this is VOTER FRAUD, but is it widespread? 

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2016/10/29/trump-supporter-charged-with-voting-twice-in-iowa/
 

 

Quote

Trump supporter charged with voting twice in Iowa

 

[abum 324]

40 minutes ago, Prizm123 said:

no ballots were switched,  

 

also referring to the news i share above:

 

Quote

Rote hadn’t planned on voting twice but said it was “a spur-of-the-moment thing” when she walked by the satellite voting location, she told The Washington Post in a phone interview Saturday.

 

“I don’t know what came over me,” Rote said.

She added she has been a supporter of Donald Trump since early in his campaign, after Republican candidate Mike Huckabee dropped out of the primary race.

 

Rote told Iowa Public Radio that she cast her first ballot for Trump but feared it would be changed to a vote for Hillary Clinton.

“The polls are rigged,” Rote told the radio station.

 

[Ban Hammer 13,352]

18 minutes ago, abum said:

 

 

Rote hadn’t planned on voting twice but said it was “a spur-of-the-moment thing” when she walked by the satellite voting location, she told The Washington Post in a phone interview Saturday.

 

“I don’t know what came over me,” Rote said.

She added she has been a supporter of Donald Trump since early in his campaign, after Republican candidate Mike Huckabee dropped out of the primary race.

 

Rote told Iowa Public Radio that she cast her first ballot for Trump but feared it would be changed to a vote for Hillary Clinton.

“The polls are rigged,” Rote told the radio station.

 

Published October 28, 2016 at 5:00 PM CDT

this is 2020...........

[abum 324]

Just now, Ban Hammer said:

Published October 28, 2016 at 5:00 PM CDT

this is 2020...........

 

i know, i pasted and highlighted the section where the vote could be changed to HILLARY CLINTON. of course she was not the candidate in 2020.

 

The point i was making is that, this is a good example of VOTER FRAUD. 

 

And not surprising the system is robust enough to catch such fraud. Which shows the system IS WORKING as intended. 

 

If someone were to bring issues with FRAUD, use something like this and show it is WIDESPREAD, and that is systematic. 

 

And again Gabriel Sterling, and Brad Raffensperger , both are republicans. They did not mention anything about WIDESPREAD FRAUD. 

 

(and also in 2016, no one was able to prove the lie someone made about millions of illegal votes were casted)

 

 

 

[DeleteMePlease123 91]

 

Republicans are delusional. There's no fraud whatsoever, 32 lawsuits lost attest to that.

Edited November 20, 2020 by Spookie