Biden wins presidency, Trump denied second term in White House, Fox News projects

[Dashinka 24,508]

19 minutes ago, abum said:

 

but i very much doubt Vox would produce something similar to this one

 

 

mainly because their stuff is checked out. Sure they are left leaning but you can count on them having facts to back up stuff (not Alternative Facts)

 

 

So if that is the case, voting trump in, and then flooded the "so called swamp" with more of those same people, and still she is not being locked up (but surprising number of current admin being locked up), that must mean something right..  

 

put term limit on Congress and Senate, and we might heading to the right direction. 
 

I never expected her to be locked up after he was elected.  She should have been prosecuted before she ever ran, but that ship has sailed.  I also pretty much expect the investigations on Trump to evaporate when he leaves office.  If anyone wants to investigate a past president, Obama should be first on the list with how he used his various departments, but that won't happen either.  It is interesting how much far reaching effect Ford had on going after past presidents after they left office.

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

35 minutes ago, abum said:

 

but i very much doubt Vox would produce something similar to this one

 

 

mainly because their stuff is checked out. Sure they are left leaning but you can count on them having facts to back up stuff (not Alternative Facts)

 

 

So if that is the case, voting trump in, and then flooded the "so called swamp" with more of those same people, and still she is not being locked up (but surprising number of current admin being locked up), that must mean something right..  

 

put term limit on Congress and Senate, and we might heading to the right direction. 
 

Many times what you see with them and the Huffpo is that they will have some clickbait title and a couple paragraphs of BS while the substance is buried in the article. Just like the whole "Trump paid $750 in taxes BS" the substance was buried in the article and it showed he paid alot more than that 

[Steeleballz 7,550]

36 minutes ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

Many times what you see with them and the Huffpo is that they will have some clickbait title and a couple paragraphs of BS while the substance is buried in the article. Just like the whole "Trump paid $750 in taxes BS" the substance was buried in the article and it showed he paid alot more than that 

 

  So what is the "substance" in the OANN article that claims trump should have won 410 electoral votes?

[Dashinka 24,508]

1 hour ago, Prizm123 said:

you are preaching to the choir on this. i dont think there are too many people now who dont support term limits here.

There are at least 535 the may not support term limits.

[Prizm123 1,086]

6 minutes ago, Dashinka said:

There are at least 535 the may not support term limits.

yeah, and thats why it will never happen unfortunately

[Steeleballz 7,550]

1 hour ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

The narrative being put out by the Democrats is that "there is no widespread voter fraud going on". But there keeps being ballots found in GA to the tune of thousands of votes. That has been verified. Not to mention the shenanigans going on in MI and PA that is on record

 

   Maybe stop calling it "voter fraud"? That phrase actually means something specific. They found errors in the counting process, and the majority of missing votes came from a single error. So again, that's why you have the recount in the first place when the outcome is close. Nobody was against the Trump campaign asking for recounts or bringing legitimate legal action. Unfortunately, they have mostly avoided doing that and instead have stuck to ridiculous claims and frivolous legal challenges.

 

  To my knowledge, the only actual cases of voter fraud that have been discovered and charged so far (in 2020) are still all Republican voters. I pasted the links earlier in this thread.

[Prizm123 1,086]

https://www.nationalreview.com/the-morning-jolt/americans-deserve-the-truth-even-if-its-unpleasant/

 

 

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

1 hour ago, Steeleballz said:

 

  So what is the "substance" in the OANN article that claims trump should have won 410 electoral votes?

I have no idea at all because I don't watch that thing at all. As I have said before I think their production quality is mid-00's and its a echo chamber which I hate. 

 

I have heard people try to claim that the ballots are all watermarked and tracked through blockchain. So the conspiracy is:

 

Good News from Kathryn Parish:
IA Homeland Security launched the largest election sting operation 6 hours ago.
Over 500 elite units moved into all ballot counting depots nationwide to stand guard over all the printed ballots.
They were ALL printed with QFS-BLOCKCHAIN (unbreakable code) Watermarks.
So far 14 million ballots have been put through a laser scanner in 5 different states and 78% have failed [NO watermarks] and 100% of these failed ballots all had Biden on them. Interesting next few days ahead.
This is the brilliance of Donald Trump and his team. They placed an ‘invisible watermark’ on ballots and told no one.  Now the National Guard are going in with ‘infra red’ equipment and can easily read which ballots are real and which are fake, and they are doing a recount.
The Full Story !
from James Sheets:
THE WATERMARK on the official election ballots !! The original ballots are also registered on a “QFS blockchain” to prevent fraud.
12 states were “targeted !”
The National Guard  has been deployed to 12 states  Alabama, Arizona, Pennsylvania, Colorado, Texas, Wisconsin,  Tennessee, Washington, Virginia, Delaware, Illinois and Kentucky and they are now counting the official ballots!!!!
The DEMS fell right into the trap of this sting operation and TRUMP has it all !! This FRAUD will be exposed for the whole world to see !
And isn't it fancy how the amazing  new Supreme Court Justice ‘Amy’ was appointed / confirmed by right before this election ...so that she can rightfully take care of the business of ... election fraud....
Oh and this is only the beginning of the EPIC times that lie ahead !!
So, did Trump win by a landslide !?! You will soon SEE  that he did !

Both voting by mail and voting in person have a long history of trustworthiness in the US. Voter fraud is extremely rare across voting methods.
Source: Bipartisan Policy Center
See Election Results

[Prizm123 1,086]

what in the ever lovin hell?

 

 

who would take that place seriously???

Edited November 20, 2020 by Prizm123

[abum 324]

3 hours ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

The narrative being put out by the Democrats is that "there is no widespread voter fraud going on". But there keeps being ballots found in GA to the tune of thousands of votes. That has been verified. Not to mention the shenanigans going on in MI and PA that is on record

 

 

3 hours ago, abum said:

and you are repeating the narrative of AGolf Twitler.

 

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-georgia/georgia-completes-hand-audit-of-ballots-confirms-bidens-victory-idUSKBN28000U

So where is the widespread fraud? Raffensperger should be made known of this fraud in GA 

 

1 hour ago, Steeleballz said:

   Maybe stop calling it "voter fraud"? That phrase actually means something specific. They found errors in the counting process, and the majority of missing votes came from a single error. So again, that's why you have the recount in the first place when the outcome is close. Nobody was against the Trump campaign asking for recounts or bringing legitimate legal action. Unfortunately, they have mostly avoided doing that and instead have stuck to ridiculous claims and frivolous legal challenges.

 

  To my knowledge, the only actual cases of voter fraud that have been discovered and charged so far (in 2020) are still all Republican voters. I pasted the links earlier in this thread.

 

and someone share this too on this thread (advancing the AGolf Twitler narrative - rehashing 2016 voter fraud claim) 

 

 

good thing Twitter labeled it as disputed.

 

So where is this WIDESPREAD FRAUD? Why didnt Raffensperger comment on the fraud, but instead he said team Trump had not shown any evidence? 

 

Comments please @Cyberfx1024 

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

18 minutes ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

I have no idea at all because I don't watch that thing at all. As I have said before I think their production quality is mid-00's and its a echo chamber which I hate. 

 

I have heard people try to claim that the ballots are all watermarked and tracked through blockchain. So the conspiracy is:

 

Good News from Kathryn Parish:
IA Homeland Security launched the largest election sting operation 6 hours ago.
Over 500 elite units moved into all ballot counting depots nationwide to stand guard over all the printed ballots.
They were ALL printed with QFS-BLOCKCHAIN (unbreakable code) Watermarks.
So far 14 million ballots have been put through a laser scanner in 5 different states and 78% have failed [NO watermarks] and 100% of these failed ballots all had Biden on them. Interesting next few days ahead.
This is the brilliance of Donald Trump and his team. They placed an ‘invisible watermark’ on ballots and told no one.  Now the National Guard are going in with ‘infra red’ equipment and can easily read which ballots are real and which are fake, and they are doing a recount.
The Full Story !
from James Sheets:
THE WATERMARK on the official election ballots !! The original ballots are also registered on a “QFS blockchain” to prevent fraud.
12 states were “targeted !”
The National Guard  has been deployed to 12 states  Alabama, Arizona, Pennsylvania, Colorado, Texas, Wisconsin,  Tennessee, Washington, Virginia, Delaware, Illinois and Kentucky and they are now counting the official ballots!!!!
The DEMS fell right into the trap of this sting operation and TRUMP has it all !! This FRAUD will be exposed for the whole world to see !
And isn't it fancy how the amazing  new Supreme Court Justice ‘Amy’ was appointed / confirmed by right before this election ...so that she can rightfully take care of the business of ... election fraud....
Oh and this is only the beginning of the EPIC times that lie ahead !!
So, did Trump win by a landslide !?! You will soon SEE  that he did !

Both voting by mail and voting in person have a long history of trustworthiness in the US. Voter fraud is extremely rare across voting methods.
Source: Bipartisan Policy Center
See Election Results

Ha.. that was a good one. Was this shared on social media? When I search for this I see nothing from the state of Iowa, which would be sounding the alarms if this happened. 

[Steeleballz 7,550]

25 minutes ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

I have no idea at all because I don't watch that thing at all. As I have said before I think their production quality is mid-00's and its a echo chamber which I hate. 

 

I have heard people try to claim that the ballots are all watermarked and tracked through blockchain. So the conspiracy is:

 

Good News from Kathryn Parish:
IA Homeland Security launched the largest election sting operation 6 hours ago.
Over 500 elite units moved into all ballot counting depots nationwide to stand guard over all the printed ballots.
They were ALL printed with QFS-BLOCKCHAIN (unbreakable code) Watermarks.
So far 14 million ballots have been put through a laser scanner in 5 different states and 78% have failed [NO watermarks] and 100% of these failed ballots all had Biden on them. Interesting next few days ahead.
This is the brilliance of Donald Trump and his team. They placed an ‘invisible watermark’ on ballots and told no one.  Now the National Guard are going in with ‘infra red’ equipment and can easily read which ballots are real and which are fake, and they are doing a recount.
The Full Story !
from James Sheets:
THE WATERMARK on the official election ballots !! The original ballots are also registered on a “QFS blockchain” to prevent fraud.
12 states were “targeted !”
The National Guard  has been deployed to 12 states  Alabama, Arizona, Pennsylvania, Colorado, Texas, Wisconsin,  Tennessee, Washington, Virginia, Delaware, Illinois and Kentucky and they are now counting the official ballots!!!!
The DEMS fell right into the trap of this sting operation and TRUMP has it all !! This FRAUD will be exposed for the whole world to see !
And isn't it fancy how the amazing  new Supreme Court Justice ‘Amy’ was appointed / confirmed by right before this election ...so that she can rightfully take care of the business of ... election fraud....
Oh and this is only the beginning of the EPIC times that lie ahead !!
So, did Trump win by a landslide !?! You will soon SEE  that he did !

Both voting by mail and voting in person have a long history of trustworthiness in the US. Voter fraud is extremely rare across voting methods.
Source: Bipartisan Policy Center
See Election Results

   When the person pushing the stolen election theory is the same guy who claimed the Sandy Hook shooting didn’t happen, the writing is on the wall.

[abum 324]

In case the plan could not be more clearer

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-election-strategy/2020/11/18/94fbe50e-29c9-11eb-92b7-6ef17b3fe3b4_story.html

 

Quote

Giuliani has also told Trump and associates that his ambition is to pressure GOP lawmakers and officials across the political map to stall the vote certification in an effort to have Republican lawmakers pick electors and disrupt the electoral college when it convenes next month — and Trump is encouraging of that plan, according to two senior Republicans who have conferred with Giuliani and spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the matter candidly.

 

 

So this is what? Coup? 

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

10 minutes ago, Burnt Reynolds said:

Ha.. that was a good one. Was this shared on social media? When I search for this I see nothing from the state of Iowa, which would be sounding the alarms if this happened. 

Yeah it was shared on FB by someone I knew in HS

11 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

   When the person pushing the stolen election theory is the same guy who claimed the Sandy Hook shooting didn’t happen, the writing is on the wall.

So who is pushing the stolen election theory?

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

17 minutes ago, abum said:

 

 

 

 

and someone share this too on this thread (advancing the AGolf Twitler narrative - rehashing 2016 voter fraud claim) 

 

 

good thing Twitter labeled it as disputed.

 

So where is this WIDESPREAD FRAUD? Why didnt Raffensperger comment on the fraud, but instead he said team Trump had not shown any evidence? 

 

Comments please @Cyberfx1024 

Anything election related is disputed right now. So what are you talking about exactly because you lost me. There is a tweet from someone how someone found Trump votes labeled as Biden's which had been back up and verified now in four counties in GA alone in the last week