Biden wins presidency, Trump denied second term in White House, Fox News projects

[Prizm123 1,086]

4 minutes ago, Nitas_man said:

Which law was broken.  Tell us

i am waiting for proof, as are the courts. 🤣

[Nitas_man 3,100]

9 minutes ago, Burnt Reynolds said:

You're asking how the virus spread from China? 

 

And how the WHO helped facilitate it?

 

 

 

I don't doubt the distinct possibility it does go nowhere, but I was hopeful for a second that was a place we could actually agree on something, since you said you don't like courts deciding things. 🙁

I don’t.  The state courts already ruled, a federal court has already ruled, so what now?  Is it possible, just possible that this is just more gaslighting from Trump?

Edited November 9, 2020 by Nitas_man

[Nitas_man 3,100]

1 minute ago, Prizm123 said:

i am waiting for proof, as are the courts. 🤣

Two sets of courts seem to have been unable to find merit in this

[Nitas_man 3,100]

13 minutes ago, JoBri said:

And states DO, but ONLY when they abide by the LAW. Which has not happened

Not according to the state and federal courts who have already tossed this frivolous suit

[JoBri 548]

3 minutes ago, Nitas_man said:

Which law was broken. 

I believe we will be informed of the correct phrasing of the legalities by the lawyers in court in the morning. Then you will see it in print 

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

5 minutes ago, Prizm123 said:

i am waiting for proof, as are the courts. 🤣

What kind of proof are you looking for?

 

3 minutes ago, Nitas_man said:

Two sets of courts seem to have been unable to find merit in this

That's what they concluded? How would they find it?

 

5 minutes ago, Nitas_man said:

I don’t.  The state courts already ruled, a federal court has already ruled, so what now?  Is it possible, just possible that this is just more gaslighting from Trump?

What did they rule on? And Trump would be gaslighting with PA poll observers' statements and proof of thousands of dead voters voting that others got?

[Nitas_man 3,100]

10 minutes ago, Ban Hammer said:

why are you talking about tbone?

Reported.  Sucker punches violate the spirit of the TOS.  It’s in the fine print.

Edited November 9, 2020 by Nitas_man

[JoBri 548]

Goodnight y'all.  It is 0121, which means 1:21am, in Central Germany, where once upon a time I, but now my wife,  was/is defending this great country of ours from all that wish to see it destroyed or undermined. Have a great night

[Nitas_man 3,100]

4 minutes ago, JoBri said:

Goodnight y'all.  It is 0121, which means 1:21am, in Central Germany, where once upon a time I, but now my wife,  was/is defending this great country of ours from all that wish to see it destroyed or undermined. Have a great night

Just know that we stood by and made sure your military ballot was processed and not thrown out like Lt Bonespur asked them to do

[Nitas_man 3,100]

12 minutes ago, Burnt Reynolds said:

What kind of proof are you looking for?

 

That's what they concluded? How would they find it?

 

What did they rule on? And Trump would be gaslighting with PA poll observers' statements and proof of thousands of dead voters voting that others got?

Exactly.  No merit no case.  Rather strong wording from judges.

I tried to call the Trump campaign hotline to report that 94,000 people named Hugh Jass tried to vote in Tulsa but the line was busy all day.  I wonder why.

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

4 minutes ago, Nitas_man said:

Exactly.  No merit no case.  Rather strong wording from judges.

I tried to call the Trump campaign hotline to report that 94,000 people named Hugh Jass tried to vote in Tulsa but the line was busy all day.  I wonder why.

I think you need to better antiquate yourself to the case relating to Alito's orders, as it's not the same as the others.

 

The other lawsuits right now haven't even reached the courts. They're not "waiting for proof", they're waiting for lawsuits, and in one case, they're actually waiting for Democrats to show they segregated ballots and discussing among themselves how to proceed, as in, to a full court now, full court later (maybe grouping lawsuits together), dismiss entirely, etc.

Edited November 9, 2020 by Burnt Reynolds

[Nitas_man 3,100]

8 minutes ago, Burnt Reynolds said:

I think you need to better antiquate yourself to the case relating to Alito's orders, as it's not the same as the others.

 

The other lawsuits right now haven't even reached the courts. They're not "waiting for proof", they're waiting for lawsuits, and in one case, they're actually waiting for Democrats to show they segregated ballots and discussing among themselves how to proceed, as in, to a full court now, full court later (maybe putting these things together), dismiss entirely, etc.

I’m pretty sure we are talking about the same case.  Delivery extension?  Due to postal delays?  

If so, the courts are likely going to view that the damage to the disenfranchised voter is real and measurable while the damage to the campaign is frivolous.  There might even be some evidence based on postal service activity under direction from the Trump administration that the disenfranchisement was intended. 

 

As to the case related to the ballot inspections the poll-watchers implied they weren’t allowed inside grudgingly admitted that in fact they were, which incensed the judge. 
 

Now Ima ask seriously - is there one I missed (related to Pa)

 

Me personally - that’s why I step up, hit a booth, vote in person.

Edited November 9, 2020 by Nitas_man

[JoBri 548]

57 minutes ago, Nitas_man said:

Just know that we stood by and made sure your military ballot was processed and not thrown out like Lt Bonespur asked them to do

Huh?  I don't understand 

[JoBri 548]

1 hour ago, Nitas_man said:

Just know that we stood by and made sure your military ballot was processed and not thrown out like Lt Bonespur asked them to do

So  you are saying that as Democrats you can decide whose votes can be counted? Afraid not. Not in MY country

[laylalex 7,293]

I think Nitas_man is talking about this: https://www.militarytimes.com/pay-benefits/2020/11/05/former-military-leaders-trumps-tweet-is-attack-on-our-electoral-process/