Biden wins presidency, Trump denied second term in White House, Fox News projects

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

1 minute ago, Dashinka said:

The issue these lawmakers have is they don’t want people to think elections have issues, so they want to dismiss anyone challenging as hacks, or kooks.  In the meantime we have states completely disregarding the recommendations of the study done by President Carter and Secretary Baker about how to conduct elections.  I do not have a lot of respect for Carter as a President, but he does have credibility regarding elections.

Yes! It looks like Republicans are getting some pretty hard lessons about how corrupt their own people are too. Rather than just go back to the status quo, might be better to employ some of that principle I hear a lot about and actually vote in better people rather than tick a party box, even if it might not be Republican.

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

56 minutes ago, designguy said:

Where is the affidavit from a poll watcher saying they were told to leave?

Tim lays everything out pretty good today

 

[Dashinka 24,505]

1 hour ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

Tim lays everything out pretty good today

 

But it was debunked by a certified Chinese, sorry, I mean FB fact checking site.

[Crtcl Rice Theory 2,432]

2 hours ago, designguy said:

The hearing with the adult film actress lookalike woman who is on probation for a "computer crime"?

Really? Computer crime? Tell me more.

[moxy 1,051]

3 hours ago, Burnt Reynolds said:

The President was pretty straight forward about his desire to get in a SCOTUS judge because he saw in the primaries and through other means efforts to screw with the election. He's also tried to go straight to SCOTUS and got mad because he has to go through the states first. To conclude what you are concluding, you're saying he's trolling not only his supporters but the high court as well that he's already arguing before. Also while the term "fraud" is one of the things argued, it's also a catch all to describe efforts to undermine the election. The State Farm video helps contextualize a litany of chain of custody issues pointing to people behaving in ways where people they clearly oppose were not allowed to monitor the election as required by law. A fair election isn't a preference, it's a requirement.

Then why is the Trump legal team not arguing ANY of this?

 

You and his other supporters have pieced this whole thing together in a manner that would make Sherlock Holmes envious, but for some reason when it comes to the courtroom, all the Trump legal team seems to be able to argue is anything but fraud, or whatever synonym you care to use in its place. We’ve been promised the evidence, we’ve been promised the kraken, we’ve been promised the whole thing would be laid bare and so many Democrats would go to prison and Trump would be handed his second term in light of all of it. But not only hasn’t the evidence materialized, but the Trump legal team won’t even argue it in court.

 

Even if I agreed that the story woven by you and others here made perfect sense, you’re not at Rudy’s side to present it. Why isn’t Rudy putting all of this supposed evidence in front of a judge and arguing fraud?

[abum 324]

3 hours ago, moxy said:

Shock or not, the president is screaming fraud but his legal team isn't actually pursuing fraud. So if where they are is "not pursuing fraud" and where they want to be is "prove fraud" then maybe he needs a different legal team. Or maybe there's actually no evidence of fraud, and the president is lying to his base.

 

Wait what?? Are you accusing that the President could be lying? That is unheard off.. not! (Borat style)  

 

 

 

 

The guy that has been caught lying thousands of times managed to get his based riled up for his own massive attempt to do election fraud.

 

Yeah this "election is a mess" due to that serial liar, repeating his baseless lie since 2016, and that has been seen trying unsuccessfully to bring a clear proof where the FRAUD was (WIDESPREAD or not).

[Dashinka 24,505]

2 minutes ago, abum said:

 

Wait what?? Are you accusing that the President could be lying? That is unheard off.. not! (Borat style)  

 

 

 

 

The guy that has been caught lying thousands of times managed to get his based riled up for his own massive attempt to do election fraud.

 

Yeah this "election is a mess" due to that serial liar, repeating his baseless lie since 2016, and that has been seen trying unsuccessfully to bring a clear proof where the FRAUD was (WIDESPREAD or not).

You do realize that Old Joe is also a pathological liar right?

Edited December 5, 2020 by Dashinka

[moxy 1,051]

2 minutes ago, Dashinka said:

You do realize that Old Joe is also a pathological liar right?

Y’know, I’m just happy you’re acknowledging Trump is a pathological liar. Thank you.

[Dashinka 24,505]

Just now, moxy said:

Y’know, I’m just happy you’re acknowledging Trump is a pathological liar. Thank you.

Are you acknowledging that Old Joe is also a pathological liar?

[moxy 1,051]

3 minutes ago, Dashinka said:

Are you acknowledging that Old Joe is also a pathological liar?

Nope. I don’t think Biden is pathological.

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

3 minutes ago, moxy said:

Then why is the Trump legal team not arguing ANY of this?

 

You and his other supporters have pieced this whole thing together in a manner that would make Sherlock Holmes envious, but for some reason when it comes to the courtroom, all the Trump legal team seems to be able to argue is anything but fraud, or whatever synonym you care to use in its place. We’ve been promised the evidence, we’ve been promised the kraken, we’ve been promised the whole thing would be laid bare and so many Democrats would go to prison and Trump would be handed his second term in light of all of it. But not only hasn’t the evidence materialized, but the Trump legal team won’t even argue it in court.

 

Even if I agreed that the story woven by you and others here made perfect sense, you’re not at Rudy’s side to present it. Why isn’t Rudy putting all of this supposed evidence in front of a judge and arguing fraud?

I dunno what you're arguing, or even asking, if anything. I'm told I'm weaving some story but I'm pretty straight forward about the things I'm arguing, and it has nothing to do with krakens and whatever else the tangent is going on about.

[moxy 1,051]

1 minute ago, Burnt Reynolds said:

I dunno what you're arguing, or even asking, if anything. I'm told I'm weaving some story but I'm pretty straight forward about the things I'm arguing, and it has nothing to do with krakens and whatever else the tangent is going on about.

I’m asking why the Trump legal team is not arguing in court, all of the evidence of fraud that you are convinced happened. You keep bringing up all this supposed evidence, but I’m wondering if you have an explanation as to why this evidence isn’t being brought into court by Rudy’s team. If there is widespread evidence of fraud, but Rudy and team are not arguing it in the courts, then what’s the point?

[laylalex 7,285]

Yeah, what I don't get is if there really was fraud, it's either not being pleaded inside a courtroom, or if it is, the courts have rejected the claims because there just isn't convincing evidence. I mean, they've had a gazillion chances to make these claims in the 75 bajillion lawsuits (approx.) filed so far, and there's not been a single finding of fraud. The lawsuits keep getting dismissed, often in very harsh terms. 

[Dashinka 24,505]

12 minutes ago, moxy said:

Nope. I don’t think Biden is pathological.

Yeah, I guess 47 years of being a corrupt career politician with the only notable achievement is being a major sponsor of a crime bill putting a lot of minorities in prison gives one the chance to pull the wool over their supporters eyes.

[moxy 1,051]

Just now, Dashinka said:

Yeah, I guess 47 years of being a corrupt career politician with the only notable achievement is being a major sponsor of a crime bill putting a lot of minorities in prison gives one the chance to pull the wool over their supporters eyes.

None of which is “pathological.”