Facebook and Twitter reducing distribution of New York Post Hunter Biden story [merged threads]

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

 

Quote

 

Report: Whistleblower to Meet with FBI Again over Biden Corruption Scandal

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) agents will again interview Tony Bobulinski regarding his involvement in Hunter Biden’s business dealings, Bobulinski told Sinclair Broadcast Group reporter James Rosen as part of a Thursday report.

EXCLUSIVE: Tony Bobulinski tells @WeAreSinclair he was questioned by six @FBI agents, with counsel present, for five hours on October 23, listing him as a "material witness" in an ongoing investigation focused on Hunter Biden and his associates. His cell phones were examined. pic.twitter.com/5lPzRTREJN

— James Rosen (@JamesRosenTV) October 29, 2020

 

 

 

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/10/29/report-tony-bobulinski-to-meet-with-fbi-again-over-biden-corruption-scandal/

[Ban Hammer 13,481]

related threads merged

[Dashinka 24,727]

48 minutes ago, Burnt Reynolds said:

So what's the hold up? Waiting on the election results to decide how to proceed?

 

 

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/10/29/report-doj-official-confirms-fbi-investigating-hunter-biden-for-money-laundering/

Didn't Old Joe say Hunter was the the smartest guy he knew?

 

Joe Biden calls son Hunter 'smartest guy I know' amid questions over business dealings

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/joe-biden-hunter-smartest-guy-i-know

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

Whoever didn't watch that Tucker interview with Bobulinski should.. here's a chunk of it:

 

 

There is absolutely no question Joe was involved in this. And the fact that they are using the US government and selling access to the government to start and further their own personal wealth, spreading to Kazakhstan, Romania, France, Oman, and so on, just shows how screwed up this is. They were going to keep going as long as they were allowed and had the cover they wanted. They also were involved with the Chinese government in this.

 

There is no stopping this now. The question remains, and I remain skeptical (will believe it when I see at minimum indictments, and not a second sooner).. are they going to suffer the consequences?

 

 

 

1 minute ago, Dashinka said:

Didn't Old Joe say Hunter was the the smartest guy he knew?

 

Joe Biden calls son Hunter 'smartest guy I know' amid questions over business dealings

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/joe-biden-hunter-smartest-guy-i-know

 

 

What a joke.

Edited October 29, 2020 by Burnt Reynolds

[Crtcl Rice Theory 2,432]

26 minutes ago, Burnt Reynolds said:

Whoever didn't watch that Tucker interview with Bobulinski should.. here's a chunk of it:

 

 

There is absolutely no question Joe was involved in this. And the fact that they are using the US government and selling access to the government to start and further their own personal wealth, spreading to Kazakhstan, Romania, France, Oman, and so on, just shows how screwed up this is. They were going to keep going as long as they were allowed and had the cover they wanted. 

 

There is no stopping this now. The question remains, and I remain skeptical (will believe it when I see at minimum indictments, and not a second sooner).. are they going to suffer the consequences?

Bobulinski said he came forward in response to the NY Post article. That is a lie, he attempted to sell his story to Fox and WSJ but was rejected before NY Post published it. The man has no credibility. 

 

"Kazakhstan, Romania, France" someone has conflated the set locations of Borat with something that didn't happen. 

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

Thankfully we have actual texts and emails that Bobulinski provided, some of which are in that very interview, that make us not rely on untrustworthy word of mouth nor lies like the one you just told. The proof is all that matters, not any of the narration surrounding it. The latter is just noise, and it's interesting what some find preferable.

Edited October 29, 2020 by Burnt Reynolds

[Crtcl Rice Theory 2,432]

2 minutes ago, Burnt Reynolds said:

Thankfully we have actual texts and emails that Bobulinski provided, some of which are in that very interview, that make us not rely on untrustworthy word of mouth nor lies like the one you just told. The proof is all that matters, not any of the narration surrounding it. The latter is just noise, and it's interesting what some find preferable.

Why did he lie?

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

10 minutes ago, CanAm1980 said:

Why did he lie?

The only one lying here is you. He clearly said here he came forward in response to people smearing his name and lying to the public as he was a recipient of the emails in question (the emails Giuliani gave to the Post). He then tried to privately go to the Bidens and tell them to have people like Schiff retract their statement, they refused, so the next day he went public. Unlike you, he has proof of what he says, what he did, he gave proof of Joe's involvement, and the level of corruption of the Bidens, and their use of government power and influence. But I understand the need for some people to have this go away.. it just isn't. 

[Crtcl Rice Theory 2,432]

Just now, Burnt Reynolds said:

The only one lying here is you. He clearly said here he came forward in response to people smearing his name and lying to the public as he was a recipient of the emails in question (the emails Giuliani gave to the Post). He then tried to privately go to the Bidens and tell them to have people like Schiff retract their statement, they refused, so the next day he went public. Unlike you, he has proof of what he says, what he did, he gave proof of Joe's involvement, and the level of corruption of the Bidens, and their use of government power and influence. But I understand the need for some people to have this go away.. it just isn't. 

You are accusing me of lying. Show me where.

 

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

Just now, CanAm1980 said:

You are accusing me of lying. Show me where.

 

You said he came forward in response to the NY Post article. He didn't come forward because of the Post's article. He came forward because of people both lying and smearing his name, as he was the recipient of an email that was published. People like Schiff and others likening him to "Russia" compelled him to come forward. To this day, Biden, his campaign, and others in the media continue the "Russian" bullshit even when it's clear Bobulinski and his proof has nothing to do with Russia. 

[Crtcl Rice Theory 2,432]

5 minutes ago, Burnt Reynolds said:

You said he came forward in response to the NY Post article. He didn't come forward because of the Post's article. He came forward because of people both lying and smearing his name, as he was the recipient of an email that was published. People like Schiff and others likening him to "Russia" compelled him to come forward. To this day, Biden, his campaign, and others in the media continue the "Russian" bullshit even when it's clear Bobulinski and his proof has nothing to do with Russia. 

You are just repeating this man's talking points and offering no proof. He was taking an active role in peddling this story before the Post. He is not a victim of a smear campaign, he is part of it. 

Edited October 30, 2020 by CanAm1980

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

2 minutes ago, CanAm1980 said:

You are just repeating this man's talking points and offering no proof. He was taking an active role in peddling this story before the Post. He is not a victim of a smear campaign, he is part of it. 

He provided proof in this very interview posted, not to mention the other things he released, showing he tried to go to the Bidens before even going public once his name was used, he recorded the conversation. So, you're lying again. It's not a smear campaign if people have proof of their claims, you're simply lying in a dismissive fashion without a shred of proof against Bobulinski's relevant claims on Biden because you don't want this information out.. plain and simple. What you're doing isn't in a vacuum either, I watch the media do it too. The repeated mention of "Russia" here when the proof Bobulinski presented is from his own texts and emails, further demonstrates the malice behind these lies.

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,378]

I wonder if Trump gets reelected they will impeach him again for something Joe Biden did 

[Steeleballz 7,550]

9 hours ago, CanAm1980 said:

May not have been that important , or maybe never existed.

 

   They found it.

 

 

[Crtcl Rice Theory 2,432]

25 minutes ago, Burnt Reynolds said:

He provided proof in this very interview posted, not to mention the other things he released, showing he tried to go to the Bidens before even going public once his name was used, he recorded the conversation. So, you're lying again. It's not a smear campaign if people have proof of their claims, you're simply lying in a dismissive fashion without a shred of proof against Bobulinski's relevant claims on Biden because you don't want this information out.. plain and simple. What you're doing isn't in a vacuum either, I watch the media do it too. The repeated mention of "Russia" here when the proof Bobulinski presented is from his own texts and emails, further demonstrates the malice behind these lies.

So I am a liar and a malicious liar. Got it. Anything else you need to pin on me?