Jump to content
Steeleballz

New England Journal of Medicine blasts Trump officials' response to virus, calls for new leaders

By Steeleballz in Current Events and Hot Social Topics

 Share

83 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Voice of Reason Grand Master

Voice of Reason   10,298

Posted
Filed: Timeline
Posted
53 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

 

  There were only two options worth doing. Either don't ban flights and let everyone in and hope you can screen for illness, or ban travel and quarantine everyone coming in from the endemic area. Hindsight is 20:20 but banning travel and letting some people in didn't really accomplish anything different than letting everyone in would have done. Travel ban/restriction and quarantine might have worked. 

But your party of choice said banning travel from China was xenophobic.  Imagine what might have happened if they DIDN'T fight Trump at every turn, and we HAD banned all incoming flight from China back in January like was proposed?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 82
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Steeleballz
Steeleballz

He'll be fine. He hasn't even taken HCQ yet. If there are any setbacks, he still has the wonder drug to fall back on.    

Steeleballz
Steeleballz

The average person with Covid gets told to go quarantine at home until/unless they have difficulty breathing. The president got hospitalized and received the newest and best treatments possible after

Nature Boy 2.0
Nature Boy 2.0

Well known liberal bias rooted in Harvard University 

Crtcl Rice Theory Experienced

Crtcl Rice Theory   2,432

Posted
Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
 Timeline
Posted
55 minutes ago, Voice of Reason said:

But your party of choice said banning travel from China was xenophobic.  Imagine what might have happened if they DIDN'T fight Trump at every turn, and we HAD banned all incoming flight from China back in January like was proposed?  

How did the Democrats block travel from China? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Steeleballz Mentor

Steeleballz   7,550

Posted
Timeline
  • Author
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Voice of Reason said:

But your party of choice said banning travel from China was xenophobic.  Imagine what might have happened if they DIDN'T fight Trump at every turn, and we HAD banned all incoming flight from China back in January like was proposed?  

 

  He would have taken flak from the Democrats for banning all flights, but he might be looking a whole lot better right now. Ultimately Trump is president. The buck stops with him. Banning some flights from China got him the same flak from the Dems anyway, without really accomplishing anything tangible.

 

  Personally I would have been fine if we had banned incoming flights everywhere and had a 14 day quarantine for returning residents. Do that until you assess the severity of the virus.  I think they tried to have it both ways so as to ban some flights, but not be disruptive to all the USC's returning. We paid for that with exponentially greater disruption to everything. I never saw much sense in just banning flights from China.

Edited by Steeleballz

995507-quote-moderation-in-all-things-an

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Voice of Reason Grand Master

Voice of Reason   10,298

Posted
Filed: Timeline
Posted
2 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

 

  He would have taken flak from the Democrats for banning all flights, but he might be looking a whole lot better right now. Ultimately Trump is president. The buck stops with him. Banning some flights from China got him the same flak from the Dems anyway, without really accomplishing anything tangible.

 

  Personally I would have been fine if we had banned incoming flights everywhere and had a 14 day quarantine for returning residents. Do that until you assess the severity of the virus.  I think they tried to have it both ways so as to ban some flights, but not be disruptive to all the USC's returning. We paid for that with exponentially greater disruption to everything. I never saw much sense in just banning flights from China.

I can get behind that.  Though in the beginning, there WOULD have been tons of pushback trying to quarantine thousands of people who were returning from overseas (and... where do you house them at the point of embarkation?).  But a total ban/quarantine would have been better than what we did, and yes, I am certain the dems would have opposed Trump over it, HARD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Steeleballz Mentor

Steeleballz   7,550

Posted
Timeline
  • Author
Posted
10 minutes ago, Voice of Reason said:

I can get behind that.  Though in the beginning, there WOULD have been tons of pushback trying to quarantine thousands of people who were returning from overseas (and... where do you house them at the point of embarkation?).  But a total ban/quarantine would have been better than what we did, and yes, I am certain the dems would have opposed Trump over it, HARD.

 

    It sounds bad until we compare it to the alternative. Instead of a few thousand people wasting a couple of weeks, we all have done that for months. Like I said though, hindsight is 20:20.  

995507-quote-moderation-in-all-things-an

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TBoneTX Grand Master

TBoneTX   45,303

Posted
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
 Timeline
Posted
2 hours ago, Steeleballz said:

hindsight is 20:20

A lot of folks want to put this year 20:20 in the rear-view mirror...

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dashinka Grand Master

Dashinka   24,505

Posted
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
 Timeline
Posted
4 hours ago, Steeleballz said:

 

   Indeed. Hopefully the next one is better.

Not likely if Biden is elected.

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...