President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump test positive for Covid-19

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

14 minutes ago, laylalex said:

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=12370063

Sounds like a terrorist threat to me.

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

1 hour ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

Did the gates of the MDL spew open in the last few days ?

You been smack in the MOLD all summer, so you can't even tell anymore.

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

1 minute ago, Voice of Reason said:

Sounds like a terrorist threat to me.

Sounds like a guy who didn't land the job (that he wanted) and so threw a tantrum against the guy who fired him.

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

Meanwhile, Trump tweeted all is going well, he thinks.  

[laylalex 7,284]

10 minutes ago, Burnt Reynolds said:

Sounds like a guy who didn't land the job (that he wanted) and so threw a tantrum against the guy who fired him.

That's a tantrum?  

[Nitas_man 3,100]

56 minutes ago, Voice of Reason said:

https://

56 minutes ago, Voice of Reason said:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4420971/

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4420971/

So 15.3% of HCW’s wearing cloth masks got sick, and 8.3% of HCW’s wearing medical masks got sick.

That’s about right and runs with the 50% or so relative efficacy reported in other studies.

 

50% relative efficacy treating unmasked patients?  That’s all one can glean from these tables but I’ll take it.  At an Ro of 2-3 you’re almost there if your goal is to break a transmission train and stamp it out.

 

Believe we agreed masks worn by the public don’t protect the wearer, but add 50% protection (vs a medical mask) to reduction (not mentioned here) in aerosols by a masked infected wearer and you can probably see why Tokyo and Taipei and Kuala Lumpur did so well. 
 

Where do the actual numbers in this study say that a cloth mask is worse than no mask at all?

Edited October 3, 2020 by Nitas_man

[Nitas_man 3,100]

21 minutes ago, Voice of Reason said:

Sounds like a terrorist threat to me.

Glad you equate spreading COVID to terrorism.  We’re aligned.  

Edited October 3, 2020 by Nitas_man

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

21 minutes ago, Nitas_man said:

Glad you equate spreading COVID to terrorism.  We’re aligned.  

Look who has more humanity, loyalty, and integrity than you.  Not very surprising.

 

https://news.yahoo.com/nkoreas-kim-wishes-trump-speedy-230010929.html

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

 

[Crtcl Rice Theory 2,432]

Trump's campaign manager tests positive for Covid-19

 

Updated 1:05 AM EDT, Sat October 03, 2020

(CNN)President Donald Trump's campaign manager Bill Stepien has tested positive for coronavirus, according to a senior official, becoming the latest figure in the President's inner circle to be infected with Covid-19.

Stepien received the results of the test on Friday night and is suffering from what the official described as "mild flu-like" symptoms.

Stepien traveled to Cleveland with the President and his team on Tuesday for the first presidential debate and was seen in close proximity to Hope Hicks, the President's top aide who also tested positive.

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

Thankfully this is all just fake anyways:

 

MSNBC's Joy Reid suggests Trump is faking COVID diagnosis to 'get out of the debates'

https://www.foxnews.com/media/msnbc-joy-reid-trump-coronavirus-faking

 

 

 

[Divided States 33]

Natural selection.

[Nitas_man 3,100]

3 hours ago, Voice of Reason said:

Look who has more humanity, loyalty, and integrity than you.  Not very surprising.

 

https://news.yahoo.com/nkoreas-kim-wishes-trump-speedy-230010929.html

What isn’t surprising is a trumper holding up Kim Jong as a shining example of humanity, loyalty, and integrity.  
 

 

 

Edited October 3, 2020 by Nitas_man

[Nitas_man 3,100]

3 hours ago, Divided States said:

Natural selection.

White House training on “How to Seed your Communities with COVID-19”

 

[Dashinka 24,437]

9 hours ago, Nitas_man said:

What I said.  No study ever concluded a single covering was worse than nothing at all

 

Testing has been done.  Early summer.  
 

ACS Nano has 85 pages of tables with carefully tested materials and filtration efficiencies as a function of particle size stapled to a report documenting the math and assumptions.    
 

But you knew that.  Because you’re MIT  Me?  I’ll take it.  65% reduction in Ro of 2.5 drives this virus out of circulation.  I’ll

leave the math to you.  Lots of room

for trumpers who dont want to carry their load.  We’re used to that by now.

So are you retracting the study you posted or just refusing to read it?