California Legislature Passes Bill Reducing Penalties for Oral, ####### Sex with Willing Children

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

5 minutes ago, Voice of Reason said:

Technically, she only mentioned one person she might have gotten into trouble, not that (s)he was the only sex partner.  But I like where your head is at.

American Pie taught me all the math I need to know.

[Crtcl Rice Theory 2,432]

22 hours ago, laylalex said:

I pointed you to the Penal Code sections already. You need to read the bill in connection with the sections and you will see it, it just takes putting it all together from all the various sections that cross-reference each other. It is really important imo to see that the definition of "sexual penetration" doesn't cover oral or A sex -- "sexual organs" don't count when it comes to penetration of the back passage (so dumb I cannot use the actual word), which is weird -- that's sodomy and it will put you on the register. But if you penetrate with a finger or [imagine whatever you like that isn't a sexual organ that can penetrate], the judge has discretion now if the child is at least 14 and the adult is no more than 10 years older. 

 

I will tell you you need to look at section 290 as it is currently written and how the bill would change it. The other sections are 286, 287 and 288. None of those sections are changed by the bill, only section 290 from the way I read it. 

 

The change doesn't just cover gay people. It covers people of all sexual orientations. You do not have to be gay to engage in oral or A sex, obviously. No one is potentially getting away with it -- statutory rape is statutory rape. This is only about whether an adult will be automatically added to the sex offenders register. 

 

I am sick of reading about this at this point and I think you can find me firmly in the camp that statutory rape is wrong, which isn't exactly a controversial place to argue from I think!   I am all for happy, healthy, consensual sex between adults of whatever age difference and whatever sexual persuasion. Except this kind of sex (crossover post -- Daily Mail update for Boiler): https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8678997/Woman-caught-husband-having-sex-mother-says-suspected-them.html

 

I think your careful stating and restating of the facts is a waste of your time, this thread has entered the Q! zone.

Edited September 6, 2020 by CanAm1980