Jump to content
royyount

Thoughts on Writ of Mandamus for K-1 Stuck at NVC

 Share

26 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Peru
Timeline
On 8/24/2020 at 2:48 PM, Paul & Mary said:

Wom for a K1 at NVC that is DQ can only mean it's denial.  A DQ'ed K1 is just sitting there for shipment. 

 

There is nothing suit can do to open a consulate.

 

The thing is.... consulates are not close. They ARE open according to the last statistics of non immigrant visas. 
 

And from what I read, they are not suing USCIS. The law suit is against the Department of State for not declaring the resumption of K1 in certain countries while other non immigrant visas are processed.

 

For example: the US embassy in my country has been processing tourist visas but not K1s. How an US sponsored visa has less priority than a B2? I haven’t seen any proclamation that states that B2 are mission critical. My case has been sitting in the consulate since March 🤷🏽‍♀️ & they shut down the embassy the day before my interview so it makes sense to me to be the first one in line. 

Edited by Kittens&Pickle
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Italy
Timeline
1 hour ago, Kittens&Pickle said:

The thing is.... consulates are not close. They ARE open according to the last statistics of non immigrant visas. 
 

And from what I read, they are not suing USCIS. The law suit is against the Department of State for not declaring the resumption of K1 in certain countries while other non immigrant visas are processed.

 

For example: the US embassy in my country has been processing tourist visas but not K1s. How an US sponsored visa has less priority than a B2? I haven’t seen any proclamation that states that B2 are mission critical. My case has been sitting in the consulate since March 🤷🏽‍♀️ & they shut down the embassy the day before my interview so it makes sense to me to be the first one in line. 

Yeah they have no basis for the statement that you'll get denied and are oblivious to the research and insight we have so totally ignore them. They are very wrong and it's not worth it to dispute them since it doesn't affect them anyway. Hang in there. At least some of us have a light at the end of the tunnel now. 

Edited by MelissaHussain
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
On 8/24/2020 at 12:48 PM, Paul & Mary said:

Wom for a K1 at NVC that is DQ can only mean it's denial.  A DQ'ed K1 is just sitting there for shipment. 

 

There is nothing suit can do to open a consulate.

 

But a lot of these consulates are open and refusing to prioritize k-1 while processing students and au-pairs.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Philippines
Timeline
7 minutes ago, EllieK said:

But a lot of these consulates are open and refusing to prioritize k-1 while processing students and au-pairs.. 

The visa unit that processes students and au-pairs is not the visa unit that does k1s.  

YMMV

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
2 minutes ago, payxibka said:

The visa unit that processes students and au-pairs is not the visa unit that does k1s.  

Right but at some point I think it’s reasonable for k-1s to questions why resources are not being better allocated to reunite families during a global pandemic. 
there’s compelling information that k-1 is being treated terribly by embassies as a result of directions from DOS and I don’t think it’s responsible for the admin on this page to not acknowledge that and simply dismiss people’s concerns. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Philippines
Timeline
6 minutes ago, EllieK said:

Right but at some point I think it’s reasonable for k-1s to questions why resources are not being better allocated to reunite families during a global pandemic. 
there’s compelling information that k-1 is being treated terribly by embassies as a result of directions from DOS and I don’t think it’s responsible for the admin on this page to not acknowledge that and simply dismiss people’s concerns. 

The NIV unit is not trained.  

Who is this admin ?

YMMV

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Philippines
Timeline

Greenbaum is not an admin but a member and has every right to express an opinion even if it is different than yours.  In addition,  should not be expected to tone it down or acknowledge anything, just because you think so.

YMMV

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Mexico
Timeline
1 hour ago, payxibka said:

Greenbaum is not an admin but a member and has every right to express an opinion even if it is different than yours.  In addition,  should not be expected to tone it down or acknowledge anything, just because you think so.

Where does greenbaum come into play here? I must of missed something 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, In4theJourney said:

Where does greenbaum come into play here? I must of missed something 

Greenbaum is the honorary mayor of VJ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey,

 

Thought I’d weigh into this discussion. I’m considering the same thing as the original poster. However, my case is at the London embassy and I’ve had one cancelled interview. 
 

I’ve read your points about a write of mandamus possibly resulting in a denial. Obviously I want to avoid that and I’d rather not be back at square one. However, I’ve been informed by a lawyer involved with a potential case that this is not how a WoM works and that if they were to proceed with litigation and take the case, they would be seeking the resumption of K visa processing, not a final decision on visa issuance. 
 

I understand your answers may be based on your knowledge and expertise but a lawyer with plenty of experience has stated otherwise. I wouldn’t want to risk a denial but I’ve been told that wouldn’t happen if a case doesn’t win at court. Is there any proof to the contrary in support of the points made concerning a denial? Any help would be appreciated. I may post a separate thread for this too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Taiwan
Timeline
15 hours ago, EllieK said:

Right but at some point I think it’s reasonable for k-1s to questions why resources are not being better allocated to reunite families during a global pandemic. 

Fiances are not immediate family members per law......therefore the IV units are prioritizing spouses, children.....that's my guess.

Edited by Lucky Cat

"The US immigration process requires a great deal of knowledge, planning, time, patience, and a significant amount of money.  It is quite a journey!"

- Some old child of the 50's & 60's on his laptop 

 

Senior Master Sergeant, US Air Force- Retired (after 20+ years)- Missile Systems Maintenance & Titan 2 ICBM Launch Crew Duty (200+ Alert tours)

Registered Nurse- Retired- I practiced in the areas of Labor & Delivery, Home Health, Adolescent Psych, & Adult Psych.

IT Professional- Retired- Web Site Design, Hardware Maintenance, Compound Pharmacy Software Trainer, On-site go live support, Database Manager, App Designer.

______________________________________

In summary, it took 13 months for approval of the CR-1.  It took 44 months for approval of the I-751.  It took 4 months for approval of the N-400.   It took 172 days from N-400 application to Oath Ceremony.   It took 6 weeks for Passport, then 7 additional weeks for return of wife's Naturalization Certificate.. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...