Army officer says Gitmo panels flawed

[one...two...tree 2,762]

By BEN FOX, Associated Press Writer

An Army officer with a key role in the U.S. military hearings at Guantanamo Bay says they relied on vague and incomplete intelligence and were pressured to declare detainees "enemy combatants," often without any specific evidence.

His affidavit, released Friday, is the first criticism by a member of the military panels that determine whether detainees will continue to be held.

Lt. Col. Stephen Abraham, a 26-year veteran of military intelligence who is an Army reserve officer and a California lawyer, said military prosecutors were provided with only "generic" material that didn't hold up to the most basic legal challenges.

Despite repeated requests, intelligence agencies arbitrarily refused to provide specific information that could have helped either side in the tribunals, according to Abraham, who said he served as a main liaison between the Combat Status Review Tribunals and those intelligence agencies.

"What were purported to be specific statements of fact lacked even the most fundamental earmarks of objectively credible evidence," Abraham said in the affidavit, filed in a Washington appeals court on behalf of a Kuwaiti detainee, Fawzi al-Odah, who is challenging his classification as an "enemy combatant."

The Pentagon had no immediate comment, but a spokesman said Defense Department officials were preparing a response to the affidavit.

An attorney for al-Odah, David Cynamon, said Abraham "bravely" agreed to provide the affidavit when defense lawyers contacted him.

"It proves what we all suspected, which is that the CSRTs were a complete sham," Cynamon said.

Matthew J. MacLean, another al-Odah lawyer, said Abraham is the first member of a Combat Status Review Tribunal panel who has been identified, let alone been willing to criticize the tribunals in the public record.

"It wouldn't be quite right to say this is the most important piece of evidence that has come out of the CSRT process, because this is the only piece of evidence ever to come out of the CSRT process," MacLean said. "It's our only view into the CSRT."

Abraham said he first raised his concerns when he was on active duty with the Defense Department agency in charge of the tribunal process from September 2004 to March 2005 and felt the issues were not adequately addressed. He said he decided his only recourse was to submit the affidavit.

"I pointed out nothing less than facts, facts that can and should be fixed," he told The Associated Press in a telephone interview from his office in Newport Beach, Calif.

The 46-year-old lawyer, who remains in the reserves, said he believe he had a responsibility to point out that officers "did not have the proper tools" to determine whether a detainee was in fact an enemy combatant.

"I take very seriously my responsibility, my duties as a citizen," he said.

Cynamon said he fears the officer's military future could be in jeopardy. "For him to do this was a courageous thing but it's probably an assurance of career suicide," he said.

The military held Combatant Status Review Tribunals for 558 detainees at the U.S. Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay in 2004 and 2005, with handcuffed detainees appearing before panels made up of three officers. Detainees had a military "personal representative" instead of a defense attorney, and all but 38 were determined to be "enemy combatants."

Abraham was asked to serve on one of the panels, and he said its members felt strong pressure to find against the detainee, saying there was "intensive scrutiny" when they declared a prisoner not to be an enemy combatant. When his panel decided the detainee wasn't an "enemy combatant," they were ordered to reconvene to hear more evidence, he said.

Ultimately, his panel held its ground, and he was never asked to participate in another tribunal, he said.

In April, the Supreme Court declined to review whether Guantanamo Bay detainees may go to federal court to challenge their indefinite confinement.

Lawyers for the detainees have asked the justices to reconsider and included Abraham's affidavit in a filing made Friday. The administration opposes the request.

___

Associated Press writer Matt Apuzzo in Washington contributed to this report.

[Ban Hammer 13,352]

so much for his career

[joelunchbox 0]

so much for his career

Thank God that there are military men and women who put service above self.

This is the antithesis of the Bush administration--self above service.

the war, gitmo..all of it is a sham. Shame on Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld et al.

[pedroh 21]

"An Army officer with a key role in the U.S. military hearings at Guantanamo Bay says they relied on vague and incomplete intelligence and were pressured to declare detainees "enemy combatants," often without any specific evidence."

well.. to start with the term enemy combatant is just a bunch of bullcrap, to go around geneva conventions and do whatever the eff they want.. so, not only the panels are flawed, all that sh!t is flawed

[almaty 19]

i agree with hermano pedroh..it was a way to hold folks without proper legal means.,

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

i agree with hermano pedroh..it was a way to hold folks without proper legal means.,

Yep - by twisting the legalities and meanings the only way a frivolous trial-lawyer could.

[almaty 19]

f##k the law...we are at war, son...........

[joelunchbox 0]

f##k the law...we are at war, son...........

Could it be that, we are at war because we said "F**k the Law"?

We, as a country, need to figure out what exactly we stand for.

Gitmo? Abu Gharib? Iraq war? What is important to us?...besides SUV's, Super Bowls, Wal Mart??

[pedroh 21]

f##k the law...we are at war, son...........

Could it be that, we are at war because we said "F**k the Law"?

We, as a country, need to figure out what exactly we stand for.

Gitmo? Abu Gharib? Iraq war? What is important to us?...besides SUV's, Super Bowls, Wal Mart??

u forgot britney spears