Nationwide riot megathread

[DELETEME1234 208]

9 minutes ago, Dashinka said:

Yep, more pearl clutching from the Left.

Do the words tan suit, dijon mustard and coffee salute mean anything to you? Cry me a river.

 

 

10 minutes ago, Dashinka said:

read where anyone justified Wednesday's attack

Why would I do that, when today people are are downplaying what happened? Did I miss a memo? Is it ok to downplay this terrorist attack and try to frame it on people that you dislike on Friday because you didn't justify it on Wednesday? If so, what's on the agenda for Sunday? Planning an attack yourself? 

 

I fail to see what license "not justifying it on Wednesday" gives that has to do with comments made today?

 

14 minutes ago, Dashinka said:

I love the hypocrisy though.

Again, did I miss an attack on the Capitol that occurred earlier? Attempts at taking people hostage? Or are we pretending that the attempt to kidnap and torture Whitmer was a false flag operation by Antifa, if so, I'm sorry for not being in the know, I'm having such a hard time keeping track which people that have an extensive MAGA social media presence are actually Antifa. 

[DELETEME1234 208]

6 minutes ago, Dashinka said:

You do know that a YouGov poll is about as worthless as a $3 bill right.

I don't know, they didn't made millions of people believe that there was a way that Trump could remain president, or that a big plan was coming, like say OANN and the likes. Media that people that align with your views have given much trust. So, how bad can YouGov really be compared to that, huh? 

 

Edited to add: Anyways, I'll be nice and leave the safe echo chamber. Was fun again, thanks for insights. 

Edited January 8, 2021 by Poseidon1212

[nykolos 711]

1 hour ago, Orangesapples said:

I don't believe them. They supported him because they wanted to appease his cult. It was purely selfish 

If you consider voter base as a cult, and if you believe the numbers in this election, Biden's cult is much bigger than Trump's is..  And if you voted for Biden, you're part of the cult.

 

Aside from using political labels against a party who don't like, Republican lawmakers supported Trump because they supported his agenda, which has proven to be the greatest and most successful agenda since Ronald Reagan.

 

[Dashinka 24,505]

49 minutes ago, Poseidon1212 said:

Do the words tan suit, dijon mustard and coffee salute mean anything to you? Cry me a river.

 

 

Why would I do that, when today people are are downplaying what happened? Did I miss a memo? Is it ok to downplay this terrorist attack and try to frame it on people that you dislike on Friday because you didn't justify it on Wednesday? If so, what's on the agenda for Sunday? Planning an attack yourself? 

 

I fail to see what license "not justifying it on Wednesday" gives that has to do with comments made today?

 

Again, did I miss an attack on the Capitol that occurred earlier? Attempts at taking people hostage? Or are we pretending that the attempt to kidnap and torture Whitmer was a false flag operation by Antifa, if so, I'm sorry for not being in the know, I'm having such a hard time keeping track which people that have an extensive MAGA social media presence are actually Antifa. 

Yep, all downplaying.  Love the Leftist tactics, but I understand, some political violence is OK.

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

1 hour ago, Poseidon1212 said:

What's even more shameful is that almost 50% of Republicans support this attack in one capacity or another

So what do you say when the Left does it consistently and it is deemed "Fiery, but peaceful"

[Orangesapples 1,954]

14 minutes ago, nykolos said:

If you consider voter base as a cult, and if you believe the numbers in this election, Biden's cult is much bigger than Trump's is..  And if you voted for Biden, you're part of the cult.

 

Aside from using political labels against a party who don't like, Republican lawmakers supported Trump because they supported his agenda, which has proven to be the greatest and most successful agenda since Ronald Reagan.

 

I don't consider voter base a cult. But a significant part of the Republican voter base is a cult that just listens to and follows the dear leader. 

9 minutes ago, Dashinka said:

Yep, all downplaying.  Love the Leftist tactics, but I understand, some political violence is OK.

When did we say political violence is OK? Which political leader has been instigating violence? AOC? 

[Dashinka 24,505]

9 minutes ago, Orangesapples said:

I don't consider voter base a cult. But a significant part of the Republican voter base is a cult that just listens to and follows the dear leader. 

When did we say political violence is OK? Which political leader has been instigating violence? AOC? 

Kamala Harris when she was inciting the rioting in the PSW.  Just yesterday there was someone saying attacking the police is ok.  Additionally, there are others that will not condemn the ongoing political violence being perpetrated by the terrorist groups Antifa/BLM.  

[Boiler 45,519]

The riots last summer were bad and wrong.    

 

The storming of the Capitol was bad and wrong

 

Simples

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

15 minutes ago, Boiler said:

The riots last summer were bad and wrong.    

 

The storming of the Capitol was bad and wrong

 

Simples

Evidently not so simples.

[Orangesapples 1,954]

40 minutes ago, Dashinka said:

Kamala Harris when she was inciting the rioting in the PSW.  Just yesterday there was someone saying attacking the police is ok.  Additionally, there are others that will not condemn the ongoing political violence being perpetrated by the terrorist groups Antifa/BLM.  

BLM is a terrorist group? I don't know what to tell you

[Orangesapples 1,954]

42 minutes ago, Dashinka said:

Kamala Harris when she was inciting the rioting in the PSW.  Just yesterday there was someone saying attacking the police is ok.  Additionally, there are others that will not condemn the ongoing political violence being perpetrated by the terrorist groups Antifa/BLM.  

Source for Kamala inciting violence 

[Dashinka 24,505]

14 minutes ago, Orangesapples said:

BLM is a terrorist group? I don't know what to tell you

So you are saying political violence is justified?  Thanks for letting us know.

[DELETEME1234 208]

1 hour ago, Dashinka said:

Yep, all downplaying.  Love the Leftist tactics, but I understand, some political violence is OK.

 

1 hour ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

So what do you say when the Left does it consistently and it is deemed "Fiery, but peaceful"

I mean I was about to leave and let you guys have your safe space echo chamber, but you just couldn’t resist huh?

 

I said neither of those things, you know why? Because I’m not playing along with the whataboutism game.
 

You both keep trying to elicit a reaction out of me about other events that are wholly irrelevant to this terrorist attack, yet the only thing you achieve is make a fool out of yourself and show how much of a bunch of apologists you are. 
 

In the process you regurgitate lies about antifa being there that have already been debunked and denied by the DoJ, showing that you’ve learned absolutely nothing from this terror attack that in part came to be by peddling such lies. 
 

But the funniest thing of all is that people like you downplay a terrorist attack on their country and calling it “pearl clutching”,  while drawing the line at Target and then call themselves patriots with a straight face. 

Don’t worry though, there’s no need to be blue about it, the government will already be on your behalf for the foreseeable future 😂 

Edited January 8, 2021 by Poseidon1212

[Dashinka 24,505]

6 minutes ago, Poseidon1212 said:

 

I mean I was about to leave and let you guys have your safe space echo chamber, but you just couldn’t resist huh?

 

I said neither of those things, you know why? Because I’m not playing along with the whataboutism game.
 

You both keep trying to elicit a reaction out of me about other events that are wholly irrelevant to this terrorist attack, yet the only thing you achieve is make a fool out of yourself and show how much of a bunch of apologists you are. 
 

In the process you regurgitate lies about antifa being there that have already been debunked and denied by the DoJ, showing that you’ve learned absolutely nothing from this terror attack that in part came to be by peddling such lies. 
 

But the funniest thing of all is that people like you downplay a terrorist attack on their country and calling it “pearl clutching”,  while drawing the line at Target and then call themselves patriots with a straight face. 

Don’t worry though, there’s no need to be blue about it, the government will already be on your behalf for the foreseeable future 😂 

Gotta love the divisiveness.  You say the comparisons are irrelevant, whatever you need to justify it, but in the meantime the terrorist out West are still doing their “mostly peaceful” rioting, but that is justified since it is a Blue approved riot.  As I said then, and say now, violence in support of political ends is terrorism, and all legal avenues should be exhausted for everyone that participated.  Said that two days ago, and again yesterday, and again today, but given the mentality of the Left it is not enough, so be it.

[DELETEME1234 208]

5 minutes ago, Dashinka said:

Gotta love the divisiveness.  You say the comparisons are irrelevant, whatever you need to justify it, but in the meantime the terrorist out West are still doing their “mostly peaceful” rioting, but that is justified since it is a Blue approved riot.  As I said then, and say now, violence in support of political ends is terrorism, and all legal avenues should be exhausted for everyone that participated.  Said that two days ago, and again yesterday, and again today, but given the mentality of the Left it is not enough, so be it.

Maybe, and hear me out here, maybe if it frustrates you so much that people don't give any credibility to your condemnation, perhaps next time, you can stop discrediting your own condemnation by not dragging a completely separate topic into it. 

 

In case you missed it, the topic of today and for the foreseeable future, or at the very least of this discussion that we have right here, is the terrorist attack on the Capitol. By pointing at something else to then ask the question "But what about hem?", you undercut your own believability. After all, if you sincerely think it is so grave, then why bring up something that is unrelated? 

 

Currently the court of public opinion is in session on the matter of MAGA terrorists v. United States and you barge in talking about some other case and then act wronged when people wonder if you're sincere. 

 

None of this has anything to do with "the Left", this is simple logic. 

 

I get it, this post started months ago with the sole intent of clutching at pearls with a chaser of thinly veiled racism towards minorities. And I get that after so long, it sucks when people rain on your parade because your tribe did something really dumb, especially when it makes everything you were having so much fun over pale in comparison if only because this new stuff is Patriot Act-levels and Felony murder rule-levels of bad.

I get that the knee-jerk reaction is to try and gain the moral high ground or at least make it seem like the same. But it isn't and you can't change that, no matter how much baiting and stuff you do.

Your tribe ###### up so much that even the big leader of the tribe realized he needed to change his tune and we both know he has never done that before. And I get that it sucks that the leader of the tribe is throwing the tribe under the bus, but fret not, there's help available, people to talk to. Now in this case I'd avoid Parler if I were you because if it wasn't a three-letter-agency honeypot before, it probably is now. But I also get that these feelings might be confusing, so perhaps you can talk to someone over at 1-800-662-HELP (4357)?