Jump to content
karmasxocean

Received Letter from NVC but no NOA2

 Share

6 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Canada
Timeline

I've read on a couple of other posts about people receiving the letter from the NVC but not receiving the NOA2, but I was curious:

When I get the affidavit of support is it supposed to be mailed to the NVC before it goes to the embassy? or is it supposed to be used at the interview? Logic says it should be sent to the NVC, but my letter says "This letter is to let you know that within a week the petition will be forwarded to the appropriate visa-issuing post where your visa interview will take place." Does this mean that the NVC forwarded my petition without the Affidavit of Support?!

My congressman's office told me they have never seen this before, but I have a sneaky suspicion they rarely know what they are talking about anyway.

Sorry. I'm really confused and worried!

Timeline

03/2004 -Met Richard online

12/2005 - First meeting in Canada!

06/2006 - His first visit to the USA

12/2006 - Second visit to Canada

02/20/2007 - Sent I-129F to California Service Center

02/26/2007 - Received NOA1

06/11/2007 - Petition left NVC

06/20/2007 - Received Packet 3

06/26/2007 - Received NOA2

07/2007 - Third visit to Canada

08/11/2007 - Sent Packet 3 to Montreal, Canada

09/24/2007 - Received Packet 4

11/05/2007 - Interview Day! APPROVED!!!

11/18/2007 - POE

11/20/2007 - Wedding Day

01/07/2008 - Sent AOS and EAD

01/23/2008 - Received Receipt Notice for AOS and EAD

01/25/2008 - ASC Appointment Notice Received

02/07/2008 - Biometrics Appointment

02/08/2008 - Notice of Greencard Interview Date

03/12/2008 - Work Authorization Card Received

04/16/2008 - Greencard Interview

04/16/2008 - Greencard Issued

01/01/2010 - Received reminder to file I-751

01/16/2010 - Sent I-751 to California Service Center

01/19/2010 - Recieved NOA1 Notice for I-751

01/29/2010 - Received Notice of Biometrics Appointment

02/18/2010 - Biometrics Appointment

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Philippines
Timeline

NVC has very little involvement with a I-129F petition or K-1 visa... Affadavit (if required) is presented at the consulate.

Edited by fwaguy

YMMV

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-5 Country: Ukraine
Timeline
I've read on a couple of other posts about people receiving the letter from the NVC but not receiving the NOA2, but I was curious:

When I get the affidavit of support is it supposed to be mailed to the NVC before it goes to the embassy? or is it supposed to be used at the interview? Logic says it should be sent to the NVC, but my letter says "This letter is to let you know that within a week the petition will be forwarded to the appropriate visa-issuing post where your visa interview will take place." Does this mean that the NVC forwarded my petition without the Affidavit of Support?!

My congressman's office told me they have never seen this before, but I have a sneaky suspicion they rarely know what they are talking about anyway.

Sorry. I'm really confused and worried!

What's there to worry about? You have an approved petition, NVC has received it and most likely sent it on it's way. Like FWAGUY said, the I-134 is for the interview, NVC has nothing to do with it.

Congrats! Be happy, the USCIS doesn't have it anymore.

IR-5

11/01/2011: I-130 Submitted

11/04/2012: I-130 NOA1

04/19/2012: I-130 NOA2

05/04/2012: NVC Received

05/27/2012: Received I-864/DS 3032 Package

05/28/2012: Pay I-864 Bill

05/29/2012: Submit DS 3032/I-864

06/05/2012: Receive IV Bill online

06/05/2012: IV Bill Paid

06/06/2012: Payment Accepted

06/07/2012: IV Packet Mailed (Additional documents sent next day on 06/08/2012)

08/28/2012: Interview

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Canada
Timeline

Thanks guys, the congressman's office has no idea what is going on apparently. I'm getting all my valuable information here. He told me that it was odd for me not to have the Affidavit of Support because the NVC sends it out....He also told me that for the interview nothing was required but my fiance's passport....I think he doesn't have much knowledge on the whole thing. The only good he's doing is calling the people I cannot get through to in a timely manner. Hehehe.

Thanks!

Timeline

03/2004 -Met Richard online

12/2005 - First meeting in Canada!

06/2006 - His first visit to the USA

12/2006 - Second visit to Canada

02/20/2007 - Sent I-129F to California Service Center

02/26/2007 - Received NOA1

06/11/2007 - Petition left NVC

06/20/2007 - Received Packet 3

06/26/2007 - Received NOA2

07/2007 - Third visit to Canada

08/11/2007 - Sent Packet 3 to Montreal, Canada

09/24/2007 - Received Packet 4

11/05/2007 - Interview Day! APPROVED!!!

11/18/2007 - POE

11/20/2007 - Wedding Day

01/07/2008 - Sent AOS and EAD

01/23/2008 - Received Receipt Notice for AOS and EAD

01/25/2008 - ASC Appointment Notice Received

02/07/2008 - Biometrics Appointment

02/08/2008 - Notice of Greencard Interview Date

03/12/2008 - Work Authorization Card Received

04/16/2008 - Greencard Interview

04/16/2008 - Greencard Issued

01/01/2010 - Received reminder to file I-751

01/16/2010 - Sent I-751 to California Service Center

01/19/2010 - Recieved NOA1 Notice for I-751

01/29/2010 - Received Notice of Biometrics Appointment

02/18/2010 - Biometrics Appointment

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks guys, the congressman's office has no idea what is going on apparently. I'm getting all my valuable information here. He told me that it was odd for me not to have the Affidavit of Support because the NVC sends it out....He also told me that for the interview nothing was required but my fiance's passport....I think he doesn't have much knowledge on the whole thing. The only good he's doing is calling the people I cannot get through to in a timely manner. Hehehe.

Thanks!

NVC does much more for other types visas. For K-1 is mostly just a pit stop where it gets checked, assigned a new case number and forwarded on to the embassy or consulate.

keTiiDCjGVo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^^Agreed. Your congressman is probably confusing a K visa with the IR1/CR1. The NVC is involved (somehow!) with their affidavit of support.

SA4userbar.jpg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...