Jump to content

33 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
Posted

You cannot make this stuff up.

 

UCLA professor suspended, under police protection after threats

A California college professor reportedly is being investigated for discrimination and under police protection after refusing a request to exempt black students from final exams in the wake of George Floyd's death.

 

The University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) suspended Gordon Klein, an accounting professor in the Anderson School of Business where he's been teaching for 39 years, for three weeks beginning on June 25 after he declined a student's request to delay a final exam in light of Floyd's death, the Free Beaconreports.

Anderson School of Management Dean Antonio Bernardo sent an email to students on Monday calling Klein's behavior "troubling" and reportedly extended the time students have to complete exams given the "difficult circumstances."
 

https://www.foxnews.com/us/ucla-professor-suspended-under-police-protection-after-threats

 

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted

lol because protesting is more important than getting that degree.

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
Posted
6 minutes ago, Ban Hammer said:

lol because protesting is more important than getting that degree.

What is really scary is the response from the University, so now it is troubling to expect students to actually do any work for their participation awards.

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted
12 minutes ago, Dashinka said:

What is really scary is the response from the University, so now it is troubling to expect students to actually do any work for their participation awards.

apparently requiring people to take a test for a degree is racist too.

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Posted

When it comes to these sorts of things I like to go closer to the source. The Daily Bruin is the UCLA student paper and it's consistently fair and non-sensationalistic in my opinion. Here's their take on things, including more on why the university believed suspension was appropriate: https://dailybruin.com/2020/06/04/students-sign-petition-to-fire-ucla-lecturer-after-many-find-his-email-insensitive

 

The tone of that email is unacceptable and unprofessional. If he did not want to give an extension or provide special accommodations, he could have denied the request in a neutral way. There was no need for him to take a sarcastic tone; it added zero to the message he wanted to convey which was a simple "no." This is not to say that it is acceptable for him to be threatened in any way. Respect is a two way street; he is more than old enough to know better. The students need to learn this too -- suspension during an investigation is appropriate, but removal, in my opinion isn't.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

Read the story and was saddened.  Unsafe to say anything out of line at any university.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Posted

So being rude is acceptable? His email was completely unprofessional. When I was working in PR, if I had sent a dismissive, sarcastic email to a colleague I would have been told I was out of line. If I had sent it to a client, I would have been written up or even fired. 

 

Professors have jobs and they are expected to play by the rules. He could have done this in a way that carried no overtones one way or the other. Here is how I would do it: "Thank you for your email. Unfortunately it is my policy not to grant extensions or special accommodations for exams or final work without the approval of the department." That's it. It really isn't difficult.

 

I feel bad that this professor is being subjected to harassment. But he did not need to needlessly escalate this. He needs to bear responsibility in terms of his discipline for what he said. I didn't say harassment, I said for his discipline.

Posted

White guilt and the hijacking of it for political purposes by liberal politicians, is the sweet posion that is that keeps the black race in chains.

Name one program of liberal appeasement that has not done more harm than good to the black race.

If Black lives matter why do so many young black men die at the hands of other young black men 

 

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
Posted
36 minutes ago, laylalex said:

When it comes to these sorts of things I like to go closer to the source. The Daily Bruin is the UCLA student paper and it's consistently fair and non-sensationalistic in my opinion. Here's their take on things, including more on why the university believed suspension was appropriate: https://dailybruin.com/2020/06/04/students-sign-petition-to-fire-ucla-lecturer-after-many-find-his-email-insensitive

 

The tone of that email is unacceptable and unprofessional. If he did not want to give an extension or provide special accommodations, he could have denied the request in a neutral way. There was no need for him to take a sarcastic tone; it added zero to the message he wanted to convey which was a simple "no." This is not to say that it is acceptable for him to be threatened in any way. Respect is a two way street; he is more than old enough to know better. The students need to learn this too -- suspension during an investigation is appropriate, but removal, in my opinion isn't.

So he is being punished for editorial reasons?  Isn’t UCLA a state supported entity?  Isn’t there something called freedom of speech?  Sure, he could have been more politically correct, but that is his choice.

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
Posted
22 minutes ago, laylalex said:

So being rude is acceptable? His email was completely unprofessional. When I was working in PR, if I had sent a dismissive, sarcastic email to a colleague I would have been told I was out of line. If I had sent it to a client, I would have been written up or even fired. 

 

Professors have jobs and they are expected to play by the rules. He could have done this in a way that carried no overtones one way or the other. Here is how I would do it: "Thank you for your email. Unfortunately it is my policy not to grant extensions or special accommodations for exams or final work without the approval of the department." That's it. It really isn't difficult.

 

I feel bad that this professor is being subjected to harassment. But he did not need to needlessly escalate this. He needs to bear responsibility in terms of his discipline for what he said. I didn't say harassment, I said for his discipline.

I have known many professors that are completely unprofessional, yet they are good teachers that actually help students learn.  Regardless of the way he had responded, if the answer was no, he would have been severely canceled.

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted

i wonder if he was flooded with similar requests and was exasperated at it all.

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Posted
1 hour ago, Dashinka said:

So he is being punished for editorial reasons?  Isn’t UCLA a state supported entity?  Isn’t there something called freedom of speech?  Sure, he could have been more politically correct, but that is his choice.

 

1 hour ago, Dashinka said:

I have known many professors that are completely unprofessional, yet they are good teachers that actually help students learn.  Regardless of the way he had responded, if the answer was no, he would have been severely canceled.

Sure there is freedom of speech, but it may very well be (and I do not know what the UCLA guidelines are) that there are university codes of conduct regarding communications. Just because he is (essentially) a civil servant doesn't mean he can say whatever he wants without consequence. Would it be different if he had said "cry me a river!" or "shut the eff up you whiny diaper baby wah wah wah"? Should there be no consequences for that kind of action? Freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from consequences. 

 

Teachers are professionals and should act like professionals. I wrote a long time ago about a professor I had who pushed that boundary with me. I did not report him though I could have. Yes, what happened to me was sexual harassment, but the lesson is that teachers should be models for students in terms of good behavior. Aren't we always hearing that business wants graduates who know how to work in an office? Part of being a good worker is knowing what is and what is not acceptable in the office. Writing snide responses to colleagues and clients is not acceptable.

 

I do not think he was in the wrong to refuse. But I do think he had a clear way to express refusal that wouldn't have landed him in any hot water and yet he proactively chose to be a jerk. What did any of what he had to say add to his refusal except for him to "feel better" about himself because he was exasperated or repulsed by the request? He's a grown up who wrote like a snotty teenager. 

 

Let's say (for example) it was not about the protests, but (and I do not wish this at all) Trump had died. A student who was a fervent supporter asked that a final be postponed because it was really affecting her, and the professor said, 

Quote

Thanks for your suggestion in your email below that I give Republican students special treatment, given the tragedy with Trump. Do you know the names of the classmates that are Republican? How can I identify them since we've been having online classes only? Are there any students that may be possibly Republican leaning, such as voting for Romney? What do you suggest I do with respect to them? A full concession or just half? Also, do you have any idea if any students are from the area near Mar a Lago? I assume that they probably are especially devastated as well. I am thinking that a Democratic student from there might be possibly even more devastated by this, especially because some might think that they're happy even if they are not. My TA is from Palm Beach, so if you don't know, I can probably ask her. Can you guide me on how you think I should achieve a "no-harm" outcome since our sole course grade is from a final exam only? ... Thanks, G. Klein

How do you think a Trump supporter who was in real grief would feel to read that? Doesn't that look unprofessional? I didn't change many words there.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

Most professors would probably respond a lot more snidely than the above, lower the student's grade by a full letter simply on the basis of political sympathies, and experience zero repercussions.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Posted
9 minutes ago, TBoneTX said:

Most professors would probably respond a lot more snidely than the above, lower the student's grade by a full letter simply on the basis of political sympathies, and experience zero repercussions.

Exactly. Whether that is fair or not, it is also more opaque and might have served him better.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...