Jump to content
dadadada

Met fiancée through her work has a webcam model

 Share

29 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Timeline
2 hours ago, laylalex said:

I think that cam work isn't illegal per se because there is no physical contact. (I did a little research last night on it, quite interesting, but I'm no lawyer so take my research with a grain of salt!) It's, um, whether there are any "extracurricular" activities outside of the chatting that could be problematic. 

 

Again I say all of this without judgment. I don't see anything wrong with it, but I agree the job is potentially more of a problem than the meeting online. 

There is a surprising number of cam model/ USC relationships. More then one would think. Sometimes its even the USC being the cam model. In those cases its usually more an issue of the USC proving their income from that type of work. Ive never come across anyone who was trying to petition for an overseas cam model that had a problem because they were in said profession specifically. 

 

Technically the 'work' is considered legal but its a really gray area. And its not so much prostitution its more the whole 'filming of porn' aspect. Many performers are doing this at home in residential neighborhoods, some even have minor children present in the home. There is a variety of legal ramifications from various angles. But Ive never heard of anyone in the US getting in trouble for cam modeling unless they had other issues going on like escorting which is prostitution or drugs. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Ironclad43 said:

I think it'll be harder to prove a bonafide marriage considering her line of work, rather than any other concern.

Why? They're not married yet and they're going for a K1, so they wouldn't have to prove a bona fide marriage -- there isn't one yet. Right?

 

Also, why wouldn't a webcam model be able to fall in love with someone and marry them? I have a friend who supported herself through part of grad school doing cam work (it can be VERY hard work, which is why she quit) and she had a relationship at the time with someone who knew what she did. Ultimately it's only a job. :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ironclad43 said:

I think it'll be harder to prove a bonafide marriage considering her line of work, rather than any other concern.

I don't think that's a problem, I've never seen it as an issue cited by others before. USCIS doesn't care about your sex life (for the most part), they care about whether the relationship is for immigration purposes or not. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline

§ 40.24 Prostitution and commercialized vice.

(a) Activities within 10 years preceding visa application. An alien shall be ineligible under INA 212(a)(2)(D) only if -

(1) The alien is coming to the United States solely, principally, or incidentally to engage in prostitution, or has engaged in prostitution, or the alien directly or indirectly procures or attempts to procure, or procured or attempted to procure or to import prostitutes or persons for the purposes of prostitution, or receives or received, in whole or in part, the proceeds of prostitution; and

(2) The alien has performed one of the activities listed in § 40.24(a)(1) within the last ten years.

(b) Prostitution defined. The term “prostitution” means engaging in promiscuous sexual intercourse for hire. A finding that an alien has “engaged” in prostitution must be based on elements of continuity and regularity, indicating a pattern of behavior or deliberate course of conduct entered into primarily for financial gain or for other considerations of material value as distinguished from the commission of casual or isolated acts.

(c) Where prostitution not illegal. An alien who is within one or more of the classes described in INA 212(a)(2)(D) is ineligible to receive a visa under that section even if the acts engaged in are not prohibited under the laws of the foreign country where the acts occurred.

(d) Waiver of ineligibility - INA 212(h). If an immigrant visa applicant is ineligible under INA 212(a)(2)(D) but is qualified to seek the benefits of INA 212(h), the consular officer shall inform the alien of the procedure for applying to DHS for relief under that provision of law. A visa may not be issued to the alien until the consular officer has received notification from DHS of the approval of the alien's application under INA 212(h).

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, so since there's no sexual intercourse involved pretty much by definition when it's webcam work, it seems like it wouldn't come into play unless there is "extracurricular" activity. Intercourse is a different thing than activity or performance. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Philippines
Timeline
21 hours ago, laylalex said:

I don't want to cause any offense here so I will ask this as delicately as I can, and I really mean this in a judgment-free way. I know that cam girls/webcam models get paid for what they do, and they absolutely SHOULD get paid for it. :) And I understand that it is usually completely legal. But I do not know if there are potential implications like what I read some women who were bar girls in the Philippines go through when getting petitioned. There are presumptions I would think that USCIS/DHS might make about her job that theoretically could make things difficult at a later stage. It could be an uncomfortable discussion but it might be an important one if you have not had it already.

Bar girls do "boom boom" , webcam models don't.   Important difference. 

YMMV

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, payxibka said:

Bar girls do "boom boom" , webcam models don't.   Important difference. 

Yeah -- I was thinking about that thread the other week with the woman who worked in a bar as a musician/singer and her fiance said she wasn't a "boom boom" girl. But of course people make assumptions, like people make assumptions about exotic dancers and camgirls and phone sex workers. So I guess what I was getting at is that the OP should be ready for difficult questions even though he may have very straightforward and acceptable answers for them. :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Philippines
Timeline
1 minute ago, laylalex said:

Yeah -- I was thinking about that thread the other week with the woman who worked in a bar as a musician/singer and her fiance said she wasn't a "boom boom" girl. But of course people make assumptions, like people make assumptions about exotic dancers and camgirls and phone sex workers. So I guess what I was getting at is that the OP should be ready for difficult questions even though he may have very straightforward and acceptable answers for them. :) 

The OP isn't going to get any difficult questions.   Possibly the OPs  fiancee

YMMV

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Russia
Timeline

Thanks everyone.

 

If my fiancee is pigeon holed as a prostitute for her work history after honestly answering whatever questions are asked of her, I feel we have bigger problems that aren't so much under our control.

 

We will be honest and complete and hope everything works out in the end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Not sure if you use this website anymore. But I have some questions about your situation. My wife is Russian and webcam model, also will be interviewing in Warsaw. We didn't originally list her job on the application forms but assuming they will ask her about her job at the interview. I'd love to ask you a few questions if you see this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

The OP hasn't logged on here in 21 months, and the thread is old, so it's now locked to further comment.  The most recent poster is welcome to start a new thread.

 

Edited to add:  The OP's timeline shows that the visa was approved.

Edited by TBoneTX

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...