Rebel Alliance Ground Reports – What’s Your Current Lockdown Status?...

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

1 minute ago, sl1pstream said:

Ah yes, the CFPB, the federal bureau with the long history of corporatist corruption since its creation before time began, in 2011. Written about by corporations all across the land. Corporations that definitely don't have anything to gain by the end of the CFPB.

And again, the article brought up Star Wars and was posted here. You're saying you're not interested in discussing the actual article, huh?

The EPA is the one that caught my eye, but I noticed you conveniently omitted them this time. Don't worry, I'll take it as affirmation. 

[sl1pstream 551]

4 minutes ago, Burnt Reynolds said:

The EPA is the one that caught my eye, but I noticed you conveniently omitted them this time. Don't worry, I'll take it as affirmation. 

That's not much better. Corporations using their resources to destroy the organization from the inside so they can go right back to polluting the environment and killing life as they see fit. The Trump administration actively rewriting EPA policies to be more corporate-friendly isn't helping your position either. Or the dismantling of the EPA for that matter.

Edited May 4, 2020 by sl1pstream

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

Just now, sl1pstream said:

That's not much better. Corporations using their resources to destroy the organization from the inside so they can go right back to polluting the environment and killing life as they see fit. The Trump administration actively rewriting EPA policies to be more corporate-friendly isn't helping your position either.

Ahh, now the EPA is suddenly corporate-friendly because of the bad orange man. 

 

How little one understands how they're helping my position, not hurting.

[Dashinka 24,632]

8 minutes ago, sl1pstream said:

That's not much better. Corporations using their resources to destroy the organization from the inside so they can go right back to polluting the environment and killing life as they see fit. The Trump administration actively rewriting EPA policies to be more corporate-friendly isn't helping your position either. Or the dismantling of the EPA for that matter.

Yes, because the Dems get no benefits from corporations.  

[sl1pstream 551]

11 minutes ago, Burnt Reynolds said:

Ahh, now the EPA is suddenly corporate-friendly because of the bad orange man. 

 

How little one understands how they're helping my position, not hurting.

I like that you're pretending that he didn't get rid of EPA regulations that have a continuing effect on their bottom line. Different administrations have different environmental policies. It didn't happen suddenly, it happened over the course of his presidency.

Everyone can look at his energy policy and the changes that he's made over the past few years, including the repeal of the clean water rule and replacing the clean power plan with the affordable clean energy rule.

People are only helping your position in the sense that you dig your heels in deeper whenever someone disagrees with your firmly held belief.

Edited May 4, 2020 by sl1pstream

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

1 minute ago, sl1pstream said:

I like that you're pretending that he didn't get rid of EPA regulations that have a continuing effect on their bottom line. Different administrations have different environmental policies. It didn't happen suddenly, it happened over the course of his presidency.

Those 3 years must have felt like 50, amirite?

[sl1pstream 551]

Just now, Burnt Reynolds said:

Those 3 years must have felt like 50, amirite?

That doesn't even make sense, there's no real limit on the amount of policies that can be changed within a given time. Which also means that the next President can undo those policies as soon as they get into office. Considering that most of the really damaging changes were the ones he did through an EO because he couldn't get enough support for them, it's going to be pretty easy to undo a lot of those policies by the next president.

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

1 minute ago, sl1pstream said:

That doesn't even make sense, there's no real limit on the amount of policies that can be changed within a given time. Which also means that the next President can undo those policies as soon as they get into office. Considering that most of the really damaging changes were the ones he did through an EO because he couldn't get enough support for them, it's going to be pretty easy to undo a lot of those policies by the next president.

Don't worry, "the 50 year old EPA wasn't corporate-friendly until Trump came into office" makes perfect sense. 🙂

[sl1pstream 551]

6 minutes ago, Burnt Reynolds said:

Don't worry, "the 50 year old EPA wasn't corporate-friendly until Trump came into office" makes perfect sense. 🙂

You're the one ignoring the Trump administration's changes to the EPA and its policies or the fact that he put a coal lobbyist, of all people, in charge of it. 

Edited May 4, 2020 by sl1pstream

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

Just now, sl1pstream said:

You're the one ignoring the Trump administration's changes to the EPA and its policies or the fact that he put a coal lobbyist, of all people, in charge of it. 

I'm not ignoring them, I'm just not surprised. The Trump tunnel vision is your thing.

[sl1pstream 551]

7 minutes ago, Burnt Reynolds said:

I'm not ignoring them, I'm just not surprised. The Trump tunnel vision is your thing.

To be fair, I'm also not surprised how horrible of a presidency this turned out to be, so at least we agree on that. 👍

[Ban Hammer 13,422]

3 hours ago, sl1pstream said:

The Empire is literally based on the Republican party.

strange, i never saw the empire freeing slaves.

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

11 minutes ago, sl1pstream said:

To be fair, I'm also not surprised how horrible of a presidency this turned out to be, so at least we agree on that. 👍

 

[sl1pstream 551]

28 minutes ago, Ban Hammer said:

strange, i never saw the empire freeing slaves.

So either your educational system is terrible, or you're pretending that you didn't learn about it in school. Either way, if you're going to resort to arguments like that one, I don't really see the point in even having a discussion.

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

32 minutes ago, sl1pstream said:

To be fair, I'm also not surprised how horrible of a presidency this turned out to be, so at least we agree on that. 👍

So horrible that we are able to enjoy the best economy in all of our lives.

 

So why is it again that you're coming to America?  You seem to dislike so many things here.