Flynn's Lawyers Expose KGB-style Behavior At the DOJ and FBI [merged threads]

[Dashinka 24,628]

Did the FBI target Michael Flynn to protect Obama's policies, not national security?
 

How would you like to be investigated by the FBI because you disagreed with the president’s policies? Sounds a little KGB-ish, you might think — and you’d be right, because the FBI has zero authority to conduct such an investigation. But the more we learn about the FBI’s investigation of Michael Flynn, the more it appears he was targeted precisely because, as the national security adviser to the incoming Trump administration, he signaled that the new administration might undo Obama administration policies — which is kind of what the American people voted for in 2016. 

Some will say that Gen. Flynn was investigated for legitimate criminal or national security reasons. Yet, the FBI’s ultimate interview of Flynn addressed none of the grounds that the FBI used to open the original case against him. For those of us who have run FBI investigations, that is more than odd.

Heavily redacted FBI documents that have been released indicate Flynn was one of several Trump campaign members who merited their own subfile investigation under the larger, now infamous “Crossfire Hurricane” debacle. Flynn even got his own cool codename — “Crossfire Razor.” (No, the FBI isn’t usually that absurd. But absurdity colored that entire period of time.) 
 

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/496170-did-the-fbi-target-michael-flynn-to-protect-obamas-policies-not-national

[Dashinka 24,628]

Hopefully this is not the end for the bad actors from the FBI/DOJ.

 

DOJ drops case against Michael Flynn, in wake of internal memo release

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/drops-doj-case-against-michael-flynn-in-wake-of-internal-memo-release

 

[TBoneTX 45,571]

Pres. Trump needs to pardon Flynn, then appoint him as head of the FBI for 2 years.

Two years after that, Flynn can be appointed as head of the CIA.

 

[Dashinka 24,628]

4 minutes ago, TBoneTX said:

Pres. Trump needs to pardon Flynn, then appoint him as head of the FBI for 2 years.

Two years after that, Flynn can be appointed as head of the CIA.

 

If you were General Flynn, would you take any government job in DC?  Heck the cost of lawyers alone is staggering.  Best thing Trump could do is talk to Don Jr. and Eric.

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

12 minutes ago, TBoneTX said:

Pres. Trump needs to pardon Flynn, then appoint him as head of the FBI for 2 years.

Two years after that, Flynn can be appointed as head of the CIA.

 

Nothing to pardon because he was never convicted.... He plead guilty because they threatened his children and then he withdrew it later on once all this started coming out. You might be thinking about Stone

 

But this is a huge development. 

Edited May 7, 2020 by Cyberfx1024

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,376]

1 hour ago, TBoneTX said:

Pres. Trump needs to pardon Flynn, then appoint him as head of the FBI for 2 years.

Two years after that, Flynn can be appointed as head of the CIA.

 

Love that idea 

1 hour ago, TBoneTX said:

Pres. Trump needs to pardon Flynn, then appoint him as head of the FBI for 2 years.

Two years after that, Flynn can be appointed as head of the CIA.

 

Pardon all the Russia investigation folks

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

The left are just silent as all hell, I love it.

 

Makes all those "Vladimir" and "Russia" references in American political discourse since 2016 all the funnier.

Edited May 7, 2020 by Burnt Reynolds

[TBoneTX 45,571]

9 hours ago, Burnt Reynolds said:

Makes all those "Vladimir" and "Russia" references in American political discourse since 2016 all the funnier.

Where is Jim?

He might still claim that the Fat Orange Nixon is a Mango Mussolini.

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

4 hours ago, TBoneTX said:

Where is Jim?

He might still claim that the Fat Orange Nixon is a Mango Mussolini.

I was thinking about this last night to be honest with you. Gosh he was so happy about Flynn being taken down because he thought that Trump was next

[90DayFinancier 910]

 
‘

By Charlie Savage
May 7, 2020

WASHINGTON — The Justice Department’s decision to drop the criminal case against Michael T. Flynn, President Trump’s former national security adviser, even though he had twice pleaded guilty to lying to investigators, was extraordinary and had no obvious precedent, a range of criminal law specialists said on Thursday.

“I’ve been practicing for more time than I care to admit and I’ve never seen anything like this,” said Julie O’Sullivan, a former federal prosecutor who now teaches criminal law at Georgetown University.

The move is the latest in a series that the department, under Attorney General William P. Barr, has taken to undermine and dismantle the work of the investigators and prosecutors who scrutinized Russia’s 2016 election interference operation and its links to people associated with the Trump campaign.

The case against Mr. Flynn for lying to the F.B.I. about his conversations with the Russian ambassador was brought by the office of the former special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III. It had become a political cause for Mr. Trump and his supporters, and the president had signaled that he was considering a pardon once Mr. Flynn was sentenced. But Mr. Barr instead abruptly short-circuited the case.

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/07/us/politics/michael-flynn-case.html

Edited May 8, 2020 by 90DayFinancier

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

5 hours ago, TBoneTX said:

Where is Jim?

He might still claim that the Fat Orange Nixon is a Mango Mussolini.

@JimandChristy we miss you bro

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

So I had to dig alittle bit but it was well worth it in my opinion. Does anybody remember these threads???
 

 

 

[Dashinka 24,628]

There are other former federal prosecutors that have a different opinion.  Are they experts as well?

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

2 hours ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

I was thinking about this last night to be honest with you. Gosh he was so happy about Flynn being taken down because he thought that Trump was next

 

1 hour ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

So I had to dig alittle bit but it was well worth it in my opinion. Does anybody remember these threads???
 

 

 

 

I hope VJ investigated this guy for being a loser KGB Russian asset: 👇

 

On 5/17/2017 at 7:22 AM, IAMX said:

There are respectable liberals like Kucinich who are actually honest about this stuff..

 

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/05/16/dennis-kucinich-calls-high-bs-quotient-on-wapo-story-asks-who-leaked/

Dennis Kucinich Calls ‘High BS Quotient’ on WaPo Story, Asks Who Leaked

 

 

Former Ohio Congressman Dennis Kucinich, a democrat, said on Fox News Tuesday morning that there is a “high BS quotient” on claims made by anonymous sources in the Washington Post story that claimed President Donald Trump provided classified information to Russian officials.

Kucinich told host Shannon Bream, “If this information was so sensitive, then why did intel leak it to the Washington Post? Whoever leaked it undermined the alliance.” 

The Democrat former congressman continued:

…something is out of control here. there is an effort here to up end the relationship with russia. put us at odds. it started during the obama administration in october of 2016 when it was a peace agreement or an agreement to end the conflict with syria and all of a sudden it was up ended by people in the pentagon and c.i.a. so they were making policy over the president’s head. we have one president and he is being undermined by some people in intelligence.

Kucinich went on to say that he had read the Washington Post story very carefully and, based on his 16 years of experience in the U.S. Congress, “tracking all these things that are said about foreign policy,” that “there’s a high BS quotient going on right here.” 

He added that the “meter should be going off all over town” and redirected attention to troubling leaks from the intelligence community. He said questions need to be asked about why and who within the intelligence community is leaking this information, “we don’t need to look to Russia for any affirmation here.” Kucinich went on:

Ya know we don’t need to look to Russia for any affirmation here. We need to ask questions about why is this intelligence community trying to upend the President of the United States with these leaks? Here’s the Washington Post story (holds up physical copy of the newspaper) I mean its, and all over town people are saying the President did this and that — look, I disagree with President Trump on a number of issues, but on this one, there can only be one President and somebody in the intelligence community is trying to upend this President in order to pursue a policy direction that puts us in conflict with Russia. The question is why? and who? and we need to find 

 

At any rate, some of us knew it was a fraud all along. The spy-thriller way fake news kept framing things, including their incessant use of "anonymous sources", reeked of malice. It didn't take an intellectual to see the problems with an approach that was clearly circular (guided by feelings/conjecture), and meant to be self-fulfilling, rather than simply an objective deluge of evidence (proof) like what we might see in an actual criminal case that the public can broadly coalesce around. The left, the media, their bureau buddies anonymously leaking to the media, elected politicians acting in bad faith (McCain, for example) and so on, wanted to use all of this to invoke the 25th, because all that mattered is the end result.. getting Trump out of office and returning things back to the normal they felt entitled to. Which is why, despite the dissipating Russia tin foil hattery, the same methodology continues elsewhere (e.g. Ukraine, Wuhan virus, etc).

 

Time for a certain demographic to lose with dignity, and time for some others to lose their authority if they feel like they can use that authority to dictate American elections.

Edited May 8, 2020 by Burnt Reynolds

[Dashinka 24,628]

8 minutes ago, Burnt Reynolds said:

 

 

I hope VJ investigated this guy for being a loser KGB Russian asset: 👇

 

 

At any rate, some of us knew it was a fraud all along. The spy-thriller way fake news kept framing things, including their incessant use of "anonymous sources", reeked of malice. It didn't take an intellectual to see the problems with an approach that was clearly circular (guided by feelings/conjecture), and meant to be self-fulfilling, rather than simply an objective deluge of evidence (proof) like what we might see in an actual criminal case that the public can broadly coalesce around. The left, the media, their bureau buddies anonymously leaking to the media, elected politicians acting in bad faith (McCain, for example) and so on, wanted to use all of this to invoke the 25th, because all that mattered is the end result.. getting Trump out of office and returning things back to the normal they felt entitled to. Which is why, despite the dissipating Russia tin foil hattery, the same methodology continues elsewhere (e.g. Ukraine, Wuhan virus, etc).

 

Time for a certain demographic to lose with dignity, and time for some others to lose their authority if they feel like they can use that authority to dictate American elections.

Reference the thread I started today about the media bias.