Jump to content

21 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted
18 minutes ago, sl1pstream said:

I'm pretty sure that that's the most "old person" thing I've ever read on the internet in a while. I'm belittling old people because I said kids are more open to change? 

 

And bullying does occur, there are still rotten apples everywhere. It's kind of odd to suggest that every kid's a bully though. How old are you? I noticed you liked belittling young whippersnappers, acceptable with the older generation or just in your book?

 

 

Edit: 35, smack in the middle of the young and olds.

I was referring to your use of old fart, where did I belittle younger people? 
 

stretch a little farther, I’m sure you can come up with a point

 

 

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Belgium
Timeline
Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, Randyandyuni said:

I was referring to your use of old fart, where did I belittle younger people? 
 

stretch a little farther, I’m sure you can come up with a point

Old farts describes a certain type of old person. Not every dinosaur is an old fart.

 

Clearly this has upset you. I will be outside thinking of how much harder things were in your day, as punishment for the use of old fart, with which I clearly didn't show enough respect for the buffers on the forum. I should've shown proper respect for the codgers and gaffers, as they have for the generation before them. Even though they still played rock 'n roll really loudly.

Edited by sl1pstream
Posted

You still missed the point, you defend what you perceived as intolerance with name calling, seems hypocritical to me, but hey, I’m a boomer, I don’t know any better.

 

Dont worry about upsetting me, it would take more than you offered up here

 

 

 

 

 

 

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Belgium
Timeline
Posted
1 hour ago, Randyandyuni said:

You still missed the point, you defend what you perceived as intolerance with name calling, seems hypocritical to me, but hey, I’m a boomer, I don’t know any better.

 

Dont worry about upsetting me, it would take more than you offered up here

 

 

 

 

This entire thread is making fun of this 15 year old kid and I'm the one name-calling?

 

But hey, you're a boomer, as if that's an excuse for ganging up on a 15 year old.

Posted
58 minutes ago, sl1pstream said:

This entire thread is making fun of this 15 year old kid and I'm the one name-calling?

 

But hey, you're a boomer, as if that's an excuse for ganging up on a 15 year old.

Pretty sure we making fun of the mom. Kid is a victim. 

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

Administrative action has been applied against one participant for multiple TOS violations.

Thread itself is below the water line, so it's closed and not to be restarted.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

 
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...