Jump to content

8 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Timeline
Posted
Quote

A coronavirus antibody test conducted by Stanford University scientists concluded that the infection is both more common than previously thought and possesses a lower fatality rate than what current data suggest. 

 

"Our data imply that, by April 1 (three days prior to the end of our survey) between 48,000 and 81,000 people had been infected in Santa Clara County. The reported number of confirmed positive cases in the county on April 1 was 956, 50-85-fold lower than the number of infections predicted by this study," their study reads. 

The study, which tested 3,330 people, adjusting for zip code, sex, and race/ethnicity, concludes that the prevalence of coronavirus antibodies in Santa Clara County, California, is more widespread than the number of confirmed cases indicates.

 

Some good news for a change.

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/random-sampling-test-shows-coronavirus-more-widespread-and-less-deadly-than-previously-thought-study?fbclid=IwAR26iWRkGuDyLYMm0H0TodhmFXx3jzqhQSIV-BtLkvUUXIUfiCyjhqT4QaU

 

 

Posted
13 minutes ago, Voice of Reason said:

 

   Not really a change. Third time today this has been posted. Still good news though.

995507-quote-moderation-in-all-things-an

Filed: Timeline
Posted (edited)
26 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

 

  Bill has a topic about 11 posts down and also discussing in the HCQ thread.

 

  I was expecting even higher numbers of unknown positives. I am hoping more research will be coming in from other areas. 

They're coming.  Just takes time to separate the wheat from the chaff, and to get people to report accurately (which will never happen, sadly).

 

Reported for the merge, thanks.
 

Edited by Voice of Reason
Posted
3 minutes ago, Voice of Reason said:

They're coming.  Just takes time to separate the wheat from the chaff, and to get people to report accurately (which will never happen, sadly).

 

Reported for the merge, thanks.
 

 

  These are antibody test studies, not mortality reports. All of the people are alive and there is no "reporting".

 

  I'm not sure how accurate the test is though.

995507-quote-moderation-in-all-things-an

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

 
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...