The 13 revelations showing the FBI never really had a Russia collusion case to begin with

[TBoneTX 45,571]

Can hide the truth no longer.

Quote

The 13 revelations showing the FBI never really had a Russia collusion case to begin with

by John Solomon
Last Updated:  April 13, 2020 - 12:02am

 

They've come slowly, drip by drip: the reluctant revelations of an FBI bureaucracy.  But taken together, the body of evidence now amassed over two years of investigating the investigators explains why Attorney General William Barr last week declared there was never really a basis to probe Donald Trump's campaign for alleged collusion with Russia. [...]

 

Continues here: https://justthenews.com/accountability/russia-and-ukraine-scandals/13-revelations-showing-fbi-never-really-had-russia  

 

 

[Dashinka 24,628]

And yet no one on the Left cares that a government administrative agency was used as a weapon against a political opponent.

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

At this point its a question of if these people are going to be held accountable. 

 

Thus far, all signs point to no. I'll believe it when I see it.

[TBoneTX 45,571]

1 hour ago, Dashinka said:

And yet no one on the Left cares that a government administrative agency was used as a weapon against a political opponent.

I think that they'll end up caring.

[Dashinka 24,628]

40 minutes ago, TBoneTX said:

I think that they'll end up caring.

You have much more faith than I do, but I hope so.

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,376]

I agree . Nothing will happen. The swamp is too deep. I mean look how much they had on Hillary.  Look how openly the obama admin weaponized the irs. All the swamp has done for over 3 years is investigate Trump

[sl1pstream 551]

4 hours ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

I agree . Nothing will happen. The swamp is too deep. I mean look how much they had on Hillary.  Look how openly the obama admin weaponized the irs. All the swamp has done for over 3 years is investigate Trump

Republicans have a majority and actually were in control of the presidency and both the house and the Senate for a while. They are the swamp.

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,376]

1 minute ago, sl1pstream said:

Republicans have a majority and actually were in control of the presidency and both the house and the Senate for a while. They are the swamp.

Part of the swamp 

[sl1pstream 551]

7 minutes ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

Part of the swamp 

How does that work exactly?

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,376]

38 minutes ago, sl1pstream said:

How does that work exactly?

You said Republicans were the swamp.  I corrected you, and said they are part of the swamp

[sl1pstream 551]

Just now, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

You said Republicans were the swamp.  I corrected you, and said they are part of the swamp

What I mean is that, when it comes down to it, they're 100% behind him. How are they part of the swamp if the swamp is supposed to be against him?

[TBoneTX 45,571]

5 minutes ago, sl1pstream said:

they're 100% behind him.

For the first 6 months or longer, the establishment Republicans were projecting the President's removal or flameout, so they were doing nothing to support him.  The President first tried to work within the system, and when it became clear that it wouldn't work well, he dodged that roadblock.

[sl1pstream 551]

Just now, TBoneTX said:

For the first 6 months or longer, the establishment Republicans were projecting the President's removal or flameout, so they were doing nothing to support him.  The President first tried to work within the system, and when it became clear that it wouldn't work well, he dodged that roadblock.

They were never going to remove him, they needed him. They only pretended to because they still wanted to seem like they cared about the Constitution.

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

34 minutes ago, sl1pstream said:

They were never going to remove him, they needed him. They only pretended to because they still wanted to seem like they cared about the Constitution.

Clearly you don't understand what "the swamp" means, so it would be a pointless endeavor to try and redefine and caricature it (this "Congress"/"majority" diatribe) for people who actually do understand. 

[sl1pstream 551]

Just now, Burnt Reynolds said:

Clearly you don't understand what "the swamp" means, so it would be a pointless endeavor to try and redefine and caricature it (this "Congress"/"majority" diatribe) for people who actually do understand. 

Trump is president and has been for the past 3 years. Clearly, he's pretty comfortable being part of the swamp since the only people he's actually gotten rid of were the staff members he kept bringing in himself.