Kentucky To Record License Plates At Church Services, Quarantine Car Occupants

[TBoneTX 45,571]

Hmmmm?

Quote

Kentucky To Record License Plates At Church Services, Quarantine Car Occupants

April 11, 2020 by Joy Pullmann

 

Democrat Gov. Andy Beshear has ordered state surveillance of any in-person church services conducted in Kentucky over Easter weekend, and mandatory quarantines for any who attend.

 

Kentucky State Police will record the license plate numbers of cars in church parking lots for in-person services and turn the owners' names over to local health departments, which will issue 14-day quarantine orders, according to an April 10 press release from the governor's office. [...]

 

Continues here: https://thefederalist.com/2020/04/11/kentucky-to-record-license-plates-at-church-services-quarantine-car-occupants/  

 

 

 

[Steeleballz 7,550]

33 minutes ago, TBoneTX said:

Hmmmm?

 

 

 

 

  I'm not sure why the restriction on groups inside a vehicle at drive through services. There is no reason to restrict people living at the same residence from being in a car together. 

[Orangesapples 1,954]

That's a great idea that should be implemented everywhere. 

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

Lawsuit waiting to happen.

 

Also, its funny watching Democrat leadership target churches in conservative states (unjustifiably). I foresee recall efforts.

Edited April 11, 2020 by Burnt Reynolds

[Oliversmom 250]

37 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

 

 

  I'm not sure why the restriction on groups inside a vehicle at drive through services. There is no reason to restrict people living at the same residence from being in a car together. 

I think they mean if the people are inside in the church for a service.  I don't think they are talking about drive-ins.  It sounds to me they are taking license plates of people inside the church.  Now I don't know how they will know who was actually inside.  The only thing they will get is the registered owner of the car.  

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

32 minutes ago, Oliversmom said:

I think they mean if the people are inside in the church for a service.  I don't think they are talking about drive-ins.  It sounds to me they are taking license plates of people inside the church.  Now I don't know how they will know who was actually inside.  The only thing they will get is the registered owner of the car.  

There will be endless FOIA requests along with other lawsuits finding out enforcement policy, rightfully, as we've been seeing targeting this very thing as well. Clearly both churchgoers and the government need to understand where the boundaries are.

[Oliversmom 250]

This kind of surprises.  Kentucky is my former home state.  And everything there is usually pro-church.  But I haven't been back there in many years so maybe it is different.  But I am guessing there are a lot of people protesting this.  

[Ban Hammer 13,419]

1 hour ago, Orangesapples said:

That's a great idea that should be implemented everywhere. 

[Steeleballz 7,550]

1 hour ago, Oliversmom said:

I think they mean if the people are inside in the church for a service.  I don't think they are talking about drive-ins.  It sounds to me they are taking license plates of people inside the church.  Now I don't know how they will know who was actually inside.  The only thing they will get is the registered owner of the car.  

 

   In one of the links in the article, it said they are allowing drive up services to continue, but not allowing groups to be in the car.

[Dashinka 24,628]

4 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

 

   In one of the links in the article, it said they are allowing drive up services to continue, but not allowing groups to be in the car.

Sorry, I did not read the article, did it define groups?  If one family is seven, would that be considered a group?

[Steeleballz 7,550]

1 minute ago, Dashinka said:

Sorry, I did not read the article, did it define groups?  If one family is seven, would that be considered a group?

 

  It didn't really say. I think the goal should be to prevent people from meeting in random groups. Travelling in a group that you are already with all day doesn't need to be restricted.

[Orangesapples 1,954]

8 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

 

   In one of the links in the article, it said they are allowing drive up services to continue, but not allowing groups to be in the car.

Which makes perfect sense. Unless people have persecution complex. 

[Dashinka 24,628]

4 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

 

  It didn't really say. I think the goal should be to prevent people from meeting in random groups. Travelling in a group that you are already with all day doesn't need to be restricted.

Probably, but that would be hard to police.

[Steeleballz 7,550]

2 minutes ago, Orangesapples said:

Which makes perfect sense. Unless people have persecution complex. 

 

  It doesn't, as I posted above. There is not reason to restricts groups that are already spending time together from travelling in a car together. They are all already exposed as a group or not.

 

  They should have said something like only groups of people that live in the same household are allowed.

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

11 minutes ago, Orangesapples said:

Which makes perfect sense. Unless people have persecution complex. 

Yes, makes perfect sense.

 

Dad drive car #1, Mom drive car #2, Baby drive car #3, other kid drive car #4, and so on.

 

We iz safe now, take that churches!

 

 

Edited April 11, 2020 by Burnt Reynolds