Jump to content

15 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

    My feeling is when they start to do controlled trials, they will find the effects of these drugs similar to a placebo in most people. There is no pharmacological reason that would really indicate  a reason that they should work. They would generally help if secondary infections were occurring.

 

  Three of the four treatments the WHO is testing are antivirals. I expect those will have better results. 

 

 

995507-quote-moderation-in-all-things-an

Posted
1 hour ago, 90DayFinancier said:

and other cases have show promise. Its a maybe right now. However If I am dying they can try anything they want including the root doctors 

Filed: AOS (pnd) Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted

The original French study also showed that hydroxychloroquine by itself was not that effective. It was the combination with azithromycin that was very strong. Those study sizes are all very small. What is really driving the hope for this is the anecdotal reports from China.

Filed: Timeline
Posted
3 hours ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

and other cases have show promise. Its a maybe right now. However If I am dying they can try anything they want including the root doctors 

Exactly.  If you're choice is try or die, and you choose die, I respect that.  But me?  Imma try pretty much anything that a doc suggests.  (But not Windex nor aquarium algaecide, no matter who suggests it)

Posted
21 minutes ago, Voice of Reason said:

Exactly.  If you're choice is try or die, and you choose die, I respect that.  But me?  Imma try pretty much anything that a doc suggests.  (But not Windex nor aquarium algaecide, no matter who suggests it)

You know the drill Trump said it "may" help we shall see.

The hate anything Trump immediately poo poos it

 

If Trump cured cancer a few on here would be touting the fact that he put many Medical professionals out of work 

Posted
27 minutes ago, Voice of Reason said:

Exactly.  If you're choice is try or die, and you choose die, I respect that.  But me?  Imma try pretty much anything that a doc suggests.  (But not Windex nor aquarium algaecide, no matter who suggests it)

 

    If you wanted a consensus, it would be that most doctors are not suggesting antibiotics or anti parasitics as standard treatment for the virus. The possibility would be that there could be underlying infections that do occur, perhaps yet unrecognized,  that would require treatment with these drugs. That is certainly common with flu, but not yet known with Covid-19.

 

  I certainly wouldn't be taking these as a preventative or for minor symptoms, which many people are starting to do.

995507-quote-moderation-in-all-things-an

Posted
6 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

 

    If you wanted a consensus, it would be that most doctors are not suggesting antibiotics or anti parasitics as standard treatment for the virus. The possibility would be that there could be underlying infections that do occur, perhaps yet unrecognized,  that would require treatment with these drugs. That is certainly common with flu, but not yet known with Covid-19.

 

  I certainly wouldn't be taking these as a preventative or for minor symptoms, which many people are starting to do.

Agree. I would not take for minor symptoms, but if your dying try anything 

Filed: Timeline
Posted
6 hours ago, Steeleballz said:

 

   I would try something I know works. I am not convinced with these drugs yet. Right now I would rather have one of the antiviral drugs.

I call BS.  You'd try ANYTHING, since NOTHING is known to work. 

 

As to your above, I have never one time said, nor would I ever support, taking anti bacterials or antivirals for covid-19 as a preventative, since nothing we know of works thus far.  I never take drugs unnecessarily, and do not advocate it.

 

But the case I posted, where the guy was dying, and the PROPER PRESCRIBED antimalarials saved his live?  I'd do it in a heartbeat.  As would you, I'm sure.

Posted
8 minutes ago, Voice of Reason said:

I call BS.  You'd try ANYTHING, since NOTHING is known to work. 

 

As to your above, I have never one time said, nor would I ever support, taking anti bacterials or antivirals for covid-19 as a preventative, since nothing we know of works thus far.  I never take drugs unnecessarily, and do not advocate it.

 

But the case I posted, where the guy was dying, and the PROPER PRESCRIBED antimalarials saved his live?  I'd do it in a heartbeat.  As would you, I'm sure.

 

   I wasn't even talking to you. You can take whatever you want or not. I don't know and I really don't care what you do. I'm not taking it and that's all I said. Whether you call BS or not means jack. I am not going to take something I know doesn't work. Even the anecdotal reports say it decreased viral load in a few patients without changing symptoms. 

 

  I'm not sure what it did or how much it helped the guy in your story, but he was on the phone talking to friends, so maybe he wasn't as far gone as he claims. I don't know either way, but more anecdotal evidence. 

 

  If something comes up in the clinical trials that shows any promise, that's what I would take. That's unlikely to be these 2 drugs.

995507-quote-moderation-in-all-things-an

Filed: O-2 Visa Country: Sweden
Timeline
Posted
8 hours ago, JonSeattle said:

The original French study also showed that hydroxychloroquine by itself was not that effective. It was the combination with azithromycin that was very strong. Those study sizes are all very small. What is really driving the hope for this is the anecdotal reports from China.

The French study also had a lot of drop outs go to IC.  

Filed: Timeline
Posted
12 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

 

   I wasn't even talking to you. You can take whatever you want or not. I don't know and I really don't care what you do. I'm not taking it and that's all I said. Whether you call BS or not means jack. I am not going to take something I know doesn't work. Even the anecdotal reports say it decreased viral load in a few patients without changing symptoms. 

 

  I'm not sure what it did or how much it helped the guy in your story, but he was on the phone talking to friends, so maybe he wasn't as far gone as he claims. I don't know either way, but more anecdotal evidence. 

 

  If something comes up in the clinical trials that shows any promise, that's what I would take. That's unlikely to be these 2 drugs.

He was saying goodbye to family, because his doctor(s) told him he wasn't going to live much longer.  Then they gave him the dual cocktail, his heart went into overdrive (pretty normal), and he had to be sedated.  After waking up from the second round of medication, he reported that he felt like he never had covid-19.    Even if he is the ONLY person in the world (which he isn't) who responded like he did, I think anyone, even YOU, would take that chance if they were about to die.  That's all I and NB2 are saying.  Desperate times call for desperate measures.  If I was starving to death, and my best friend died right next to me, I'd eat him to survive. 

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted
44 minutes ago, 90DayFinancier said:

Post hoc ergo propter hoc

Tantumodo in regionalibus colloquiis aliter atque Anglice loquimini!

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...