Jump to content
DELETEME1234

Judge Blocks Rule That Would Have Kicked 700,000 People Off SNAP

 Share

4 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Quote

A federal judge has issued an injunction blocking the Trump administration from adopting a rule change that would force nearly 700,000 Americans off food stamps, officially known as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP. The rule change was set to take effect April 1.

In a ruling issued Friday evening in Washington, D.C., U.S. District Court Judge Beryl Howell called the rule change capricious, arbitrary and likely unlawful.

The rule change would have required able-bodied adults without children to work at least 20 hours a week in order to qualify for SNAP benefits past three months. It would also have limited states' usual ability to waive those requirements depending on economic conditions. The preliminary injunction will preserve that flexibility.

https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2020/03/14/815748914/judge-blocks-rule-that-would-have-kicked-700-000-people-off-snap

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Poseidon1212 said:

Wow expecting able bodied adults with no kids to work 20 hours peer week. Barbaric and racist.

 

It will be over turned shortly like the rest . She is another leftist activist Trump hating  judge appointed by Nobama. She oversaw the grand jury for the Russia Probe 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

Wow expecting able bodied adults with no kids to work 20 hours peer week. Barbaric and racist.

 

It will be over turned shortly like the rest . She is another leftist activist Trump hating  judge appointed by Nobama. She oversaw the grand jury for the Russia Probe 

She's indeed one of the judicial termites that use the injunction with regularity. Thankfully Trump is in the process of fumigating this institution. It needs a reminder that its position is judging constitutionality not abusing power as a method of dealing with policy disagreements. SCOTUS is also tired of the injunctions from lower courts. It's gonna change, one way or another.

Edited by Burnt Reynolds
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Poseidon1212 said:

You know most people with no kids only get about $50 a month anyway?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...