Jump to content

26 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

I just got my wife's entire AOS packet returned from USCIS today over using the previous I-485 form. I know that the new forms and public charge rules went into effect on February 24th but that USCIS would still accept the previous rules if it was postmarked before the 24th. Our application was postmarked on the 21st. Should our application have been accepted? Am I understanding this right and if so, is there something I can do to appeal? Or should I just bite the bullet and resubmit using the new forms?

 

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ecuatorianos2018 said:

I just got my wife's entire AOS packet returned from USCIS today over using the previous I-485 form. I know that the new forms and public charge rules went into effect on February 24th but that USCIS would still accept the previous rules if it was postmarked before the 24th. Our application was postmarked on the 21st. Should our application have been accepted? Am I understanding this right and if so, is there something I can do to appeal? Or should I just bite the bullet and resubmit using the new forms?

 

Thanks!

What does the notice say as to why exactly they sent it back? Screenshot?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, K1visaHopeful said:

What does the notice say as to why exactly they sent it back? Screenshot?

This is the NOA that we got today.

Screen Shot 2020-03-12 at 6.41.38 PM.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you have the shipping receipt showing when it was postmarked?

I would call and argue your case. The PCR has strict guidelines that you had until Feb 23rd 11:59pm to use the old forms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, K1visaHopeful said:

Do you have the shipping receipt showing when it was postmarked?

I would call and argue your case. The PCR has strict guidelines that you had until Feb 23rd 11:59pm to use the old forms.

Yeah I have the receipt from UPS showing it was sent on Feb 21st. USCIS even sent back the envelope I sent the original packet in which clearly shows Feb 21st. I will call them first thing tomorrow. Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ecuatorianos2018 said:

Yeah I have the receipt from UPS showing it was sent on Feb 21st. USCIS even sent back the envelope I sent the original packet in which clearly shows Feb 21st. I will call them first thing tomorrow. Thanks!

Let us know what they say. Goodluck!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My wife and I posted ours on the same date (Feb. 21). We haven’t heard anything, and our check hasn’t been cashed, so I’m worried that it will be returned for the same reason as yours.

 

As an attorney, I am preparing to file a lawsuit in federal court against USCIS, if, after I call and argue, they refuse to accept the forms. The published rule clearly states that forms postmarked before February 24th are acceptable.

 

Please provide updates on your situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Sweden
Timeline

I had that happen with my i-765 form, it was sent back because of "outdated form". Turned out it wasn't outdated at all, but something had gone wrong when printing the form so a tiny part of the bottom was missing. The rejection letter is very generic, I'm just saying that there could possibly have been something else wrong with the form you sent and not that it was outdated. 

K-1: 12-22-2015 - 09-07-2016

AP: 12-20-2016 - 04-07-2017

EAD: 01-18-2017 - 05-30-2017

AOS: 12-20-2016 - 07-26-2017

ROC: 04-22-2019 - 04-22-2020
Naturalization: 05-01-2020 - 03-16-2021

U.S. passport: 03-30-2021 - 05-08-2021

En livstid i krig. Göteborg killed it. Epic:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBs3G1PvyfM&ab_channel=Sabaton

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are referring to the actual forms. A lot of people are getting this mixed up with post dates and forgetting to had read the fine fine print before the public charge Went into place. It also stares the forms have to have a certain date on it. This dates reflect on the bottom of the print out. I have seen a lot of these , that everyone rushed to get in before the 24th with 2020 forms in turn is basically crossing out the post dated mark statement. 
 

one of my Clients I submitted the package on the 22nd and we now yesterday have heard back from USCIS with fees completed and issued already case numbers. 
 

Double double check your papers and dates of the forms, if correct most definitely fight it. If not most likely you’ll have to resubmit with the new publix charge ruling. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Check your I-485 form and see if this is the same info that you have on top right corner of the page:

image.png.1d2c973c38794475f8b8bbbddc8444e4.png

 

Check the bottom left corner if this is what you see:

 

image.png.b61ecbd0824749bf0b961df20466e021.png

 

If not, you probably filled out an outdated form and need to download the new one from the USCIS website and resubmit.

You can find the new form here: https://www.uscis.gov/i-485

New Petition:

Apr 5,  2023: Naturalization

Apr 6, 2023: I-130 for my mother

Apr 6, 2023: NOA1

Apr 9, 2024: Approved

Apr 13, 2024: Sent to NVC

Apr 18, 2024: Received email fr NVC and paid the AOS/IV fee

Apr 23, 2024: CEAC website shows "Paid"

Apr 25, 2024: Uploaded Civil and Financial documents

May 1, 2024: Documents accepted except for marriage certificate (unreadable) and death certificate (wrong file)

May 3, 2024: Ordered marriage certificate and death certificate from PSA online

May 9, 2024: Received email from PSA that marriage cert is blurred/eligible--will need 15 more days for reverification

May 22, 2024: Marriage Cert received from PSA (death cert was delivered 2 weeks earlier)

May 23, 2024: Uploaded new files to the CEAC website

May 29, 2024: Documentary Qualified

July 13, 2024: Expedite Request to NVC

July 15, 2024: NVC responded that it will forward the request to the embassy

July 16, 2024: Expedite request rejected by the embassy

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, MarryMe987654 said:

Check your I-485 form and see if this is the same info that you have on top right corner of the page:

image.png.1d2c973c38794475f8b8bbbddc8444e4.png

 

Check the bottom left corner if this is what you see:

 

image.png.b61ecbd0824749bf0b961df20466e021.png

 

If not, you probably filled out an outdated form and need to download the new one from the USCIS website and resubmit.

You can find the new form here: https://www.uscis.gov/i-485



When filing in February, USCIS published the following language: 

 

What to Know About Sending Us Your Form

The current edition of the Form I-485, dated 07/15/19 and 12/23/17:

  • We will accept the 07/15/19 and 12/23/17 edition of this form if it is postmarked before Feb. 24, 2020
  • We will not accept the 07/15/19 and 12/23/17 edition if it is postmarked on or after Feb. 24, 2020, except those submitted by aliens/petitions with a physical address in Illinois [see information for Illinois]
  • DHS remains enjoined by a federal court from implementing the Inadmissibility on Public Charge Grounds Final Rule in Illinois. DHS has asked for a stay of this injunction from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, given the Supreme Court Decision to stay the last nationwide injunctions. For additional information, see our webpage on the status of the public charge rule in Illinois.

The updated edition of the form

On or after Feb. 24, 2020, we will accept only the edition date: 10/15/19 of the Form I-485, except those submitted by petitioners/aliens with a physical address in Illinois [see information for Illinois].

 

 

The plain and unambiguous language of this rule indicates that if form 07/15/19 was postmarked before February 24th, it will be accepted. Form dated 10/15/19 is only necessary now, if postmarked on or after February 24th.

 

If OP sent a postmarked version of 07/15/19 before the 24th, it should have been accepted. 

 

Edited by cbro20
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, fullerene said:

hi! 

 

I would like to inquire about the definition of postmarked date (commercial carrier), does it mean the when the package was shipped or when it was in possession of the said courier?

 

 

 

 

 

it’s the date reflected on the courier receipt.

 

However, “Postmarked” does not apply to commercial carriers as a legal term. The term “postmarked” applies to USPS, which is an “official carrier.” Fed Ex, UPS, etc—those are independent carriers and are governed by different rules. 
 

I believe that USCIS considers the date the package is received, not the date that the package is shipped, for effective date purposes, when the filing is sent via commercial carrier. That’s my theory as to why some of these filings are being returned as outdated, even though it appears they were “postmarked” before the deadline hit on the 24th.

 

Shipped it out on USPS on the 22nd, but it doesn’t arrive until the 26th? You’re probably fine, it was officially POSTMARKED on the 22nd (before the deadline).

 

Shipped it out with Fed Ex on the 22nd, and it arrives ON the 24th? Too late, rule went into effect already. 
 

I could be wrong, and who the hell knows how USCIS implements the term “postmarked” in practicality.

 

 

Edited by cbro20
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, cbro20 said:

 

it’s the date reflected on the courier receipt.

 

However, “Postmarked” does not apply to commercial carriers as a legal term. The term “postmarked” applies to USPS, which is an “official carrier.” Fed Ex, UPS, etc—those are independent carriers and are governed by different rules. 
 

I believe that USCIS considers the date the package is received, not the date that the package is shipped, for effective date purposes, when the filing is sent via commercial carrier. That’s my theory as to why some of these filings are being returned as outdated, even though it appears they were “postmarked” before the deadline hit on the 24th.

 

Shipped it out on USPS on the 22nd, but it doesn’t arrive until the 26th? You’re probably fine, it was officially POSTMARKED on the 22nd (before the deadline).

 

Shipped it out with Fed Ex on the 22nd, and it arrives ON the 24th? Too late, rule went into effect already. 
 

I could be wrong, and who the hell knows how USCIS implements the term “postmarked” in practicality.

Generally, the date received is what matters in terms of qualification for the benefit. This was outlined in the AFM at https://www.uscis.gov/ilink/docView/AFM/HTML/AFM/0-0-0-1/0-0-0-1067/0-0-0-1095.html. It appears that they have since (within the past couple weeks?) incorporated it into the USCIS Policy Manual here: https://www.uscis.gov/policy-manual/volume-1-part-b-chapter-6

Quote

C. Date of Receipt

USCIS considers a benefit request “received” on the date it is physically or electronically received. This date is also known as the filing date. Requestors may only obtain a date of receipt or filing date if their submission is accepted at the proper location, as designated on the USCIS website. USCIS does not assign a date of receipt or filing date to benefit requests that are rejected.[21]

The date of receipt may impact eligibility for immigration benefits. For example, USCIS uses the date of receipt to determine whether an appeal, Application for Temporary Protected Status (From I-821), or Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker (Form I-129) should be rejected for failure to timely file or because an annual numerical limit has been reached.

The date of receipt may also be significant for purposes of seeking lawful permanent residence; the filing date is referred to as the priority date for an approved immigrant visa petition in certain preference categories.[22] For approved petitions in preference categories that are not current, the priority date dictates how soon the beneficiary may file for permanent residence. Similarly, the filing date establishes the statutory period for various benefits, including naturalization.

 

However, USCIS put out special guidance regarding this particular change: https://www.uscis.gov/news/all-news/dhs-implements-inadmissibility-public-charge-grounds-final-rule

Quote

If USCIS receives an application or petition for immigration benefits using prior editions of the forms postmarked on or after Feb. 24, 2020, then USCIS will inform the applicant or petitioner of the need to submit a new application or petition using the correct forms. For applications and petitions that are sent by commercial courier (such as UPS, FedEx and DHL), the postmark date is the date reflected on the courier receipt.

So the date actually shipped, as reflected on the receipt, is what applies here for UPS.

Timelines:

ROC:

Spoiler

7/27/20: Sent forms to Dallas lockbox, 7/30/20: Received by USCIS, 8/10 NOA1 electronic notification received, 8/1/ NOA1 hard copy received

AOS:

Spoiler

AOS (I-485 + I-131 + I-765):

9/25/17: sent forms to Chicago, 9/27/17: received by USCIS, 10/4/17: NOA1 electronic notification received, 10/10/17: NOA1 hard copy received. Social Security card being issued in married name (3rd attempt!)

10/14/17: Biometrics appointment notice received, 10/25/17: Biometrics

1/2/18: EAD + AP approved (no website update), 1/5/18: EAD + AP mailed, 1/8/18: EAD + AP approval notice hardcopies received, 1/10/18: EAD + AP received

9/5/18: Interview scheduled notice, 10/17/18: Interview

10/24/18: Green card produced notice, 10/25/18: Formal approval, 10/31/18: Green card received

K-1:

Spoiler

I-129F

12/1/16: sent, 12/14/16: NOA1 hard copy received, 3/10/17: RFE (IMB verification), 3/22/17: RFE response received

3/24/17: Approved! , 3/30/17: NOA2 hard copy received

 

NVC

4/6/2017: Received, 4/12/2017: Sent to Riyadh embassy, 4/16/2017: Case received at Riyadh embassy, 4/21/2017: Request case transfer to Manila, approved 4/24/2017

 

K-1

5/1/2017: Case received by Manila (1 week embassy transfer??? Lucky~)

7/13/2017: Interview: APPROVED!!!

7/19/2017: Visa in hand

8/15/2017: POE

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, geowrian said:

Generally, the date received is what matters in terms of qualification for the benefit. This was outlined in the AFM at https://www.uscis.gov/ilink/docView/AFM/HTML/AFM/0-0-0-1/0-0-0-1067/0-0-0-1095.html. It appears that they have since (within the past couple weeks?) incorporated it into the USCIS Policy Manual here: https://www.uscis.gov/policy-manual/volume-1-part-b-chapter-6

 

However, USCIS put out special guidance regarding this particular change: https://www.uscis.gov/news/all-news/dhs-implements-inadmissibility-public-charge-grounds-final-rule

So the date actually shipped, as reflected on the receipt, is what applies here for UPS.


All of that makes sense, but how does USCIS, in all its competence, know which day a package would have been sent by a commercial carrier, if the receipt isn’t included by the applicant or carrier?

 

For example, UPS delivers a petition on the 24th. Ok, how does USCIS know that the date on the courier receipt is the 22nd? Isn’t the courier receipt simply what’s given to you when you drop off a parcel at Fed Ex or UPS?

 

Maybe I sound dumb, but I haven’t used an express courier in ages.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
“;}
×
×
  • Create New...