IP address issue

[peezey 0]

I looked and it doesn't look like it's disabled. Where do you see that?

Look at their posts. Their group is "disabled".

They aren't the same person just like I'm neither one of them. Ewok can't decipher ISP/IP log data for the life of him, and didn't think beyond "troll" to figure that some people use VPN to log in to use the internet. KV is probably still disabled because she hasn't responded to Ewok's accusation yet, or figured when she got the accusatory email that she's better off without VJ.

[Captain Ewok 1,894]

I looked and it doesn't look like it's disabled. Where do you see that?

Look at their posts. Their group is "disabled".

They aren't the same person just like I'm neither one of them. Ewok can't decipher ISP/IP log data for the life of him, and didn't think beyond "troll" to figure that some people use VPN to log in to use the internet. KV is probably still disabled because she hasn't responded to Ewok's accusation yet, or figured when she got the accusatory email that she's better off without VJ.

Peezey I will make this easy. To imply I do not know what I am doing with server logs or internet IP's is off base -- sorry if that offends you. I went to college for this and it is my personal hobby. Please do not attack me. I do this as a living off the website in the real world and know my stuff.

Secondly their accounts had Identical IP's as "effortless" and other trolls which came to the board. There accounts were beyond a reasonable doubt associated with many other troll accounts. In total 4 previously banned troll accounts had the same IP's as those accounts. If my random chance they got the same IP as four other trolls than maybe they are unlucky but statistically that is highly improbable.

Also using a VPN unless their company has Comcast as their internet provider (and I mean comcast residential per the IP's) then you are also incorrect. VPN gets you into your corporate intranet and pipes you online from there using an IP from your companies internet connection. Unless comcast supplied their business internet (most corporations have their own entire blocks of IP's and would not use comcasts) then you are also incorrect.

Unless you see the logs that I see then you are speaking without anything to back you up other than your conspiracy stories. Sorry to get on you like this but you have slandered me in the past for being incorrect on things (as if it were fact) without having all the (or any) information. In this case especially you are WAY off base and I want to make it clear you are not speaking anything other than your incorrect opinion.

[Captain Ewok 1,894]

Peezey.. here is your evidence censored some to protect privacy:

IP: 24.removed.0.removed

All members that have used this:

Recently:

Kakya vstrecha!

ahmed2258

also used and...

previously banned: effortless

previously banned: collier

previously banned: aqoulp2

All had posts overlapping in time plus IP is semi static (dsl or cable and NOT dialup and randomly assigned).

[RaspberrySwirl 20]

Peezey.. here is your evidence censored some to protect privacy:

IP: 24.removed.0.removed

All members that have used this:

Recently:

Kakya vstrecha!

ahmed2258

also used and...

previously banned: effortless

previously banned: collier

previously banned: aqoulp2

All had posts overlapping in time plus IP is semi static (dsl or cable and NOT dialup and randomly assigned).

Wow.

There's a surprise.

[Jenn! 918]

I actually am surprised. I had no idea that kakya vstrecha was the same person.

Edited June 14, 2007 by jenn3539

[doodlebug 3]

I actually am surprised. I had no idea that kakya vstrecha was the same person.

I never thought they were but I *did* think that she was married to effortless/vitr...whateverhisname was.

[Captain Ewok 1,894]

I actually am surprised. I had no idea that kakya vstrecha was the same person.

I never thought they were but I *did* think that she was married to effortless/vitr...whateverhisname was.

This very well may be the case. I am sorry if one person was not causing problems but the other was and there is no way to tell them apart (could share account). Sorry if this is the case but there really is no choice.

[JODO 2]

I actually am surprised. I had no idea that kakya vstrecha was the same person.

I never thought they were but I *did* think that she was married to effortless/vitr...whateverhisname was.

This very well may be the case. I am sorry if one person was not causing problems but the other was and there is no way to tell them apart (could share account). Sorry if this is the case but there really is no choice.

Good Looking out Cap'n

[brnidokiegurl 0]

When you have to take this action do you send them something asking or explaining the situation giving them the option to say if this was two seperate people...

[Captain Ewok 1,894]

Email is sent with suspensions. Even if it was two people but they live in the same house and use the same computer then I have to ban it anyhow. How could one tell them apart and what good is a ban if I do not enforce it...

[doodlebug 3]

Email is sent with suspensions. Even if it was two people but they live in the same house and use the same computer then I have to ban it anyhow. How could one tell them apart and what good is a ban if I do not enforce it...

you don't know that it's two people so ya done good cap'n

[brnidokiegurl 0]

yep just didnt know how suspensions work thanks for following up

[Ban Hammer 13,366]

yep just didnt know how suspensions work thanks for following up

just ask me

[sereia 0]

nice work, capt!

[peezey 0]

I looked and it doesn't look like it's disabled. Where do you see that?

Look at their posts. Their group is "disabled".

They aren't the same person just like I'm neither one of them. Ewok can't decipher ISP/IP log data for the life of him, and didn't think beyond "troll" to figure that some people use VPN to log in to use the internet. KV is probably still disabled because she hasn't responded to Ewok's accusation yet, or figured when she got the accusatory email that she's better off without VJ.

Peezey I will make this easy. To imply I do not know what I am doing with server logs or internet IP's is off base -- sorry if that offends you. I went to college for this and it is my personal hobby. Please do not attack me. I do this as a living off the website in the real world and know my stuff.

Secondly their accounts had Identical IP's as "effortless" and other trolls which came to the board. There accounts were beyond a reasonable doubt associated with many other troll accounts. In total 4 previously banned troll accounts had the same IP's as those accounts. If my random chance they got the same IP as four other trolls than maybe they are unlucky but statistically that is highly improbable.

Also using a VPN unless their company has Comcast as their internet provider (and I mean comcast residential per the IP's) then you are also incorrect. VPN gets you into your corporate intranet and pipes you online from there using an IP from your companies internet connection. Unless comcast supplied their business internet (most corporations have their own entire blocks of IP's and would not use comcasts) then you are also incorrect.

Unless you see the logs that I see then you are speaking without anything to back you up other than your conspiracy stories. Sorry to get on you like this but you have slandered me in the past for being incorrect on things (as if it were fact) without having all the (or any) information. In this case especially you are WAY off base and I want to make it clear you are not speaking anything other than your incorrect opinion.

And where is it that you are going to apologize for accusing me of having anything to do with this #######? You know my IP doesn't start with a 24, yet you accused me of having the same IP as all these other users. I have slandered you in the past? Get over yourself.

I don't seem to recall you providing all this "evidence" when you disabled tiredandwornout, a user **I** brought to your attention as an obvious double posting ID.

Edited June 14, 2007 by peezey