Hillary Clinton can be deposed about her emails, judge rules

[Boiler 46,374]

https://www.cnn.com/2020/03/02/politics/hillary-clinton-emails-deposition/index.html

 

"The Court is not confident that State currently possesses every Clinton email recovered by the FBI; even years after the FBI investigation, the slow trickle of new emails has yet to be explained," Lamberth wrote. "For this reason, the Court believes the subpoena [to Google] would be worthwhile and may even uncover additional previously undisclosed emails."

 

Perhaps eventually she will get comeuppance, not holding my breath.

[90DayFinancier 910]

24 minutes ago, Boiler said:

https://www.cnn.com/2020/03/02/politics/hillary-clinton-emails-deposition/index.html

 

"The Court is not confident that State currently possesses every Clinton email recovered by the FBI; even years after the FBI investigation, the slow trickle of new emails has yet to be explained," Lamberth wrote. "For this reason, the Court believes the subpoena [to Google] would be worthwhile and may even uncover additional previously undisclosed emails."

 

Perhaps eventually she will get comeuppance, not holding my breath.

Man, you guys just cannot give her up.  

[Boiler 46,374]

CNN?

Just now, 90DayFinancier said:

Man, you guys just cannot give her up.  

 

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

Just now, 90DayFinancier said:

Man, you guys just cannot give her up.  

Not sure to which "you guys" you are referring to over at CNN.  Can you please clarify?

Just now, Boiler said:

CNN?

 

GMTA!!!

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

There's no reason to be excited. Plenty of judges do their job because there's just way too much evidence not to consider it, criminally and civilly. However, they are not prosecutors. That requires the federal bureaus, and we already know where they stand on prosecuting Hillary, or on the flip side, pretty much anyone that is a member of the Trump team who wasn't invited to be in power.

 

Naturally, Trump can't overhaul this mess of corruption in the bureaus because corruption saturates both parties, so the Senate won't allow anyone in the bureaus outside that group who'll actually clean house and start enforcing the law.

Edited March 2, 2020 by Burnt Reynolds

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

Just died hearing Nunes...

 

"Tom Fitton is in the studio and I heard him say Hillary can be disposed.. deposed.."

 

[TBoneTX 46,426]

11 hours ago, Burnt Reynolds said:

Plenty of judges do their job

Many are called, and some are Arkancided...

[nykolos 711]

11 hours ago, 90DayFinancier said:

Man, you guys just cannot give her up.  

Putting parties aside, I think what infuriates most people is our two tier system of Justice, If it was a private citizen who did what Hillary did,  pick just one;  1) Stealing $200K in furniture, china and artwork from the White House, 2) Having her own private email server or 3) Laundering hundreds of millions of dollars through a Foundation they set up,  I think we can all agree that that person would be serving life in federal prison right now. 

 

If you work for the US Government and you commit a serious crime, there is a 9 in 10 chance you won't ever see a jail cell.

 

Hillary will NOT give a deposition, expect another year of the Clinton's appealing it, hoping it will land in the hands of a Judge who will let her off.

 

 

 

 

[TBoneTX 46,426]

1 minute ago, nykolos said:

If you work for the US Government and are a Democrat and you commit a serious crime, there is a 9 in 10 chance you won't ever see a jail cell.

Perhaps a key addition to the above.

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

7 hours ago, nykolos said:

Putting parties aside, I think what infuriates most people is our two tier system of Justice, If it was a private citizen who did what Hillary did,  pick just one;  1) Stealing $200K in furniture, china and artwork from the White House, 2) Having her own private email server or 3) Laundering hundreds of millions of dollars through a Foundation they set up,  I think we can all agree that that person would be serving life in federal prison right now. 

 

If you work for the US Government and you commit a serious crime, there is a 9 in 10 chance you won't ever see a jail cell.

 

Hillary will NOT give a deposition, expect another year of the Clinton's appealing it, hoping it will land in the hands of a Judge who will let her off.

You nailed it.  We have people in prison for accidentally putting classified materials on a regular thumb drive, or walking out of a SCIF with documents in hand.  One single little classified email on a personal email server (outside of proper government security) is a felony.  Period.

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

7 hours ago, nykolos said:

Putting parties aside, I think what infuriates most people is our two tier system of Justice, If it was a private citizen who did what Hillary did,  pick just one;  1) Stealing $200K in furniture, china and artwork from the White House, 2) Having her own private email server or 3) Laundering hundreds of millions of dollars through a Foundation they set up,  I think we can all agree that that person would be serving life in federal prison right now. 

 

If you work for the US Government and you commit a serious crime, there is a 9 in 10 chance you won't ever see a jail cell.

 

Hillary will NOT give a deposition, expect another year of the Clinton's appealing it, hoping it will land in the hands of a Judge who will let her off.

 

 

 

 

Lets not forget defying subpoenas, destroying/spoliation of evidence. Nailed it. There's no justice so long as she walks free.

 

But the status quo is you can indeed do anything, which is why not only do they break the law, they happily weaponize power they have and parade it around in people's faces that they get away with it.. see Comey, Lisa Page, Strzok, Brennan, McCabe, etc.

Edited March 3, 2020 by Burnt Reynolds

[nykolos 711]

On 3/3/2020 at 1:00 AM, TBoneTX said:

Perhaps a key addition to the above.

You're correct, Democrats do seem to get away with breaking the law far more than Republicans do,  I think one big reason is the left leaning media, they hold Republicans far more accountable, often baiting the House Judiciary into launching an investigation, and when that investigation turns up nothing, the accused is charged with a process crime. 

 

 

[nykolos 711]

On 3/3/2020 at 8:20 AM, Burnt Reynolds said:

Lets not forget defying subpoenas,

 

Defying subpoenas by Congress can be justified in some cases, especially in recent cases where the Democratically controlled House Judiciary is handing them out like candy.  Currently, the laws regarding executive privilege and congressional subpoena power remain vague, It's up to the Supreme court to decide if a cabinet member to the President should be compelled to testify. 

 

In the past, the high court has not involved itself in these disputes because they have often been negotiated between Congress and the executive branch, but now were in a different political climate, where the Democrat led House of Representatives is making every attempt to take out a sitting President.  

[spookyturtle 9,466]

Hillary who? 

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

13 hours ago, spookyturtle said:

Hillary who? 

Lewinsky