bringing my kids

[SusieQQQ 11,586]

There was a Filipino lady in the forums here a while ago who left her kids off her (family not dv) application and DS260 but ended up being able to bring them eventually. So there is a possibility it ends up ok, based on that precedent they are not always hard nosed about it, but 🤷‍♀️ hard to say 

[Crazy Cat 41,886]

12 minutes ago, Willy Valdes said:

I got 2 before mariage, the first is eleven years and the second is 8. i gor married to another woman and our son is 3 years

I am no expert,  but the problem I see is that your application should have been automatically disqualified under DV lottery rules....To me, that puts your current status in doubt.....and there's the misrepresentation angle.  I agree with the others who say it's time to get an attorney.  This could follow you a very long time....just my opinion.

 

"Tales of the Green Card"

Edited February 25, 2020 by missileman

[Willy Valdes 0]

2 minutes ago, missileman said:

I am no expert,  but the problem I see is that your application should have been automatically disqualified under DV lottery rules....To me, that puts your current status in doubt.....and there's the misrepresentation angle.  I agree with the others who say it's time to get an attorney.  This could follow you a very long time....just my opinion.

 

"Tales of the Green Card"

thanks

 

[geowrian 22,337]

Lawyer up. You're in for a ride.

[SalishSea 17,836]

1 hour ago, Willy Valdes said:

unfortunatly no. where I played, i was told that I could ad them later, because i did not have their papers with me that day

Where you "played?"  This is not a casino game.

[SalishSea 17,836]

51 minutes ago, Willy Valdes said:

This is my big worry now.

You should be worried.  You lied to get a US visa.  That is a big deal!

[Willy Valdes 0]

2 minutes ago, Jorgedig said:

Where you "played?"  This is not a casino game.

by play Imeant play the dv lottery online

[SalishSea 17,836]

2 minutes ago, Willy Valdes said:

by play Imeant play the dv lottery online

Yeah, still......it isn't Mega Millions.  It is immigration.  You played with your kids' lives and your own futures.  Personally, I would be surprised if you do not have your immigration benefits removed.

[Willy Valdes 0]

1 minute ago, Jorgedig said:

Yeah, still......it isn't Mega Millions.  It is immigration.  You played with your kids' lives and your own futures.  Personally, I would be surprised if you do not have your immigration benefits removed.

ok thanks for your opinion

[Willy Valdes 0]

59 minutes ago, SusieQQQ said:

There was a Filipino lady in the forums here a while ago who left her kids off her (family not dv) application and DS260 but ended up being able to bring them eventually. So there is a possibility it ends up ok, based on that precedent they are not always hard nosed about it, but 🤷‍♀️ hard to say 

thank you. but just to know. did she mentioned the kids at the interview?

[Lemonslice 4,850]

4 minutes ago, Willy Valdes said:

thank you. but just to know. did she mentioned the kids at the interview?

If I remember correctly, she came on a fiancé or spousal visa.  Her "omission" was not material. 

Your situation is different.

[SusieQQQ 11,586]

42 minutes ago, Jorgedig said:

Where you "played?"  This is not a casino game.

Common parlance in many countries where they talk about playing it ...

..it is a lottery after all, though the correct term is enter.

[Willy Valdes 0]

4 minutes ago, Lemonslice said:

If I remember correctly, she came on a fiancé or spousal visa.  Her "omission" was not material. 

Your situation is different.

OK I SEE. i am married and we did not mention our kuds all along the process, because of the warning at the first lignes of the DS 260 application form

[SusieQQQ 11,586]

11 minutes ago, Willy Valdes said:

thank you. but just to know. did she mentioned the kids at the interview?

 

6 minutes ago, Lemonslice said:

If I remember correctly, she came on a fiancé or spousal visa.  Her "omission" was not material. 

Your situation is different.

as above, she still should have put them on the DS260 though. I do think DV is treated more seriously because it you are explicitly disqualified for leaving dependents off the entry form.

[Willy Valdes 0]

2 minutes ago, SusieQQQ said:

 

as above, she still should have put them on the DS260 though. I do think DV is treated more seriously because it you are explicitly disqualified for leaving dependents off the entry form.

You are right