Jump to content

10 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

Yet another amazing exhibition of her estimable Occasional-Cortex.

Quote

Economics Major Ocasio-Cortez Mashes Up the Names of Two Totally Different Economists

by Rick Moran - February 9, 2020

 

[...] So the diploma says she has a degree, but it's what's in her head that's relevant to her job. And AOC comes up a little short in that department. [...]

 

Continues here: https://pjmedia.com/trending/economics-major-ocasio-cortez-mashes-up-the-names-of-two-totally-different-economists/  

 

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Israel
Timeline
Posted (edited)

lol Milton Keynes :lol: That's a good one.

 

At least she got the famed part half right.

Edited by OriZ
09/14/2012: Sent I-130
10/04/2012: NOA1 Received
12/11/2012: NOA2 Received
12/18/2012: NVC Received Case
01/08/2013: Received Case Number/IIN; DS-3032/I-864 Bill
01/08/2013: DS-3032 Sent
01/18/2013: DS-3032 Accepted; Received IV Bill
01/23/2013: Paid I-864 Bill; Paid IV Bill
02/05/2013: IV Package Sent
02/18/2013: AOS Package Sent
03/22/2013: Case complete
05/06/2013: Interview Scheduled

06/05/2013: Visa issued!

06/28/2013: VISA RECEIVED

07/09/2013: POE - EWR. Went super fast and easy. 5 minutes of waiting and then just a signature and finger print.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

05/06/2016: One month late - overnighted form N-400.

06/01/2016: Original Biometrics appointment, had to reschedule due to being away.

07/01/2016: Biometrics Completed.

08/17/2016: Interview scheduled & approved.

09/16/2016: Scheduled oath ceremony.

09/16/2016: THE END - 4 year long process all done!

 

 

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted
1 hour ago, OriZ said:

half right

Is that the segment of her cortex that functions occasionally?

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Posted (edited)

Karl Maynard Keenan is my favorite economist.. and happens to be the singer for Tool!

 

I think its interesting when understanding that virtually every communication by politicians, particularly nowadays, are scripted, even the parts where they try and look authentic. You've seen the comedic failures from Warren, Beto, and co., where they went so far out of their way to contrive some organic viral video as a branding method to connect with audiences, but faceplanted hard and just demonstrated their palpable disconnect from the rest of humanity -- this is no different. 

 

She likely remembers nothing from her degree, and doesn't need to, when she has a staff that does everything for her, probably changes/bathes her too. They write all the bills for her, they do all the research for her, they write all the speeches for her, including the one they likely had for her in this hearing, which she chose to ignore, and tried to ad lib, and it's times like that where you see their actual knowledge. However, assuming this is simple stupidity is totally missing the point.. the same way you see Amazon operating as disruptive technology, you see AOC employing disruptive politics. Trump has his own version of disruptive politics, too. AOC's brand, however, is playing dumb, so as she contrives causing chaos, it acts as a dog whistle to other people on the left to act the same way (they get the intended message which is to demonstrate how much more on board these politicians are with socialism), while everyone else gets the portrayed (wrong) message to everyone else that she's an airhead, so writing her off. It's a ploy to get people's guard down while they continue to sow chaos around the country, and it's a tactic that's working, because people have no idea how to counter the chaos they've caused (sanctuary cities, Antifa sympathy from governors/mayors/congress members/media/etc), let alone correctly assess it for its nefarious intentions (thinking its just stupidity), because they're not correctly classifying it for what it is.

Edited by Burnt Reynolds
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted
8 hours ago, Burnt Reynolds said:

t's a ploy to get people's guard down while they continue to sow chaos

Not sure that it's that conscious or premeditated, but she sure doesn't object to that effect.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, TBoneTX said:

Not sure that it's that conscious or premeditated, but she sure doesn't object to that effect.

Politics isn't that complicated, they borrow their brand image philosophies from the business world. And she is a disruptive force, one thing to understand about disruptive forces is people underestimate them as a blunder. This for example is a good reading:

 

https://www.liveworld.com/2018-social-media-political-wars-how-ocasio-cortez-used-social-media-beat-joe-crowley/

Quote

Her social program, pushing her over the top, is a near-perfect execution of the social marketing playbook we recommend to brands—but few have the understanding, focus, and will power to do.

 

The whole thing is a good read, but this part I quoted I found interesting, because the left spend significant effort deriving psychological implements designed to facilitate them getting their way. This is no different. AOC is simply better at the "authentic" brand than, say, Beto, or Warren. Rest assured though, that "non-script" appearance and the disruptive movement associated is definitely planned.

Edited by Burnt Reynolds
Posted
On 2/10/2020 at 10:04 AM, TBoneTX said:

Is that the segment of her cortex that functions occasionally?

 

  Do you ever react this way when Trump say stupid things, like windmills cause cancer, or wanting to buy Greenland? To what purpose are we reacting to a representative with "half a cortex" if we are willing to overlook a president who often appears to lack the entire organ? 

995507-quote-moderation-in-all-things-an

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
Posted

I guess since Mr. Trump is not a geography major but just a president, a little Kansas-city confusion is totally okay...

And so many more examples of Mr. Trump saying and doing stupid things as Steelballz pointed out. Mr. Trump's brain should be checked as well. 

Science is not a liberal conspiracy.

 

Our immigration journey 

 

Spoiler

 01/02/2018 Started dating 

01/21/2019 Got engaged

04/08/2019 Got married

06/17/2019 AOS package sent

06/19/2019 Package delivered

06/24/2019 Card charged 

06/25/2019 Text notifications (no email!)

07/03/2019 Received NOA1 for I-485, I-130, I-765, I-131 (dated 06/25/2019)

07/20/2019 Received biometrics appointment letter (dated 07/12/2019)

07/31/2019 Biometrics

09/03/2019 Received interview notice

10/10/2019 Interview

10/11/2019 Case approved! :star:

10/16/2019 "Card was mailed" case status update

10/17/2019 Received tracking number for the green card in mail

10/18/2019 Green card in hand! 

Spoiler

07/18/2021 ROC package sent (UPS)

07/22/2021 Package delivered

07/23/2021 Card charged

07/24/2021 Text notification - case received

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Rosalind F said:

I guess since Mr. Trump is not a geography major but just a president, a little Kansas-city confusion is totally okay...

And so many more examples of Mr. Trump saying and doing stupid things as Steelballz pointed out. Mr. Trump's brain should be checked as well. 

Surely he should have known which of the 57 states it was in 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...