Jump to content
Matt&Ali

K1 with conviction for importuning. AWA?

 Share

16 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Ireland
Timeline

Hi all,

My fiance was arrested in a sting operation for importuning back in 2005. He was on the sex offender list for 10 years. The petition was filed with his paperwork, as required.

We had the completed petition forms  reviewed by an immigration lawyer who said the petition should be fine. We filed for the K1 in September and received a letter early this month to say the case had been preliminary reviewed and was transferred from CSC to VSC as part of the processing.

I just learned about the AWA and I would really like to know where others here think we stand in terms of getting approval.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline

Not enough information to say other than it could.

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Matt&Ali said:

Hi all,

My fiance was arrested in a sting operation for importuning back in 2005. He was on the sex offender list for 10 years. The petition was filed with his paperwork, as required.

We had the completed petition forms  reviewed by an immigration lawyer who said the petition should be fine. We filed for the K1 in September and received a letter early this month to say the case had been preliminary reviewed and was transferred from CSC to VSC as part of the processing.

I just learned about the AWA and I would really like to know where others here think we stand in terms of getting approval.

 

 

 

Sex offender crimes are taken very seriously by USCIS.  Do you have a plan B, like for him to move to your country?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline
Just now, Jorgedig said:

Sex offender crimes are taken very seriously by USCIS.  Do you have a plan B, like for him to move to your country?

That could be even more difficult.

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Ireland
Timeline
5 minutes ago, Jorgedig said:

Depending on the country, for sure.

It's something we might have to now consider. I had no idea about the AWA and how it applies until yesterday. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: New Zealand
Timeline
15 minutes ago, Matt&Ali said:

It's something we might have to now consider. I had no idea about the AWA and how it applies until yesterday. 

It's not going to be easy and the wait is not short.  Our petition also falls under AWA and we had no idea until after it was transferred in Oct.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Ireland
Timeline
35 minutes ago, Dale. said:

It's not going to be easy and the wait is not short.  Our petition also falls under AWA and we had no idea until after it was transferred in Oct.  

Have you had any news since October? With the amount of reading I did on this yesterday including reading the entire Act, it seems once you fall into the category, even if its Tier 1, that preparing for a denial is something my fiance and I really need to prepare and plan for. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ukraine
Timeline

In order to beat awa you are going to need a good lawyer that specializes in this area. It’s not something for any attorney. You need someone who spends a good part of their practice dealing with these cases.  Be prepareD to spend 10k or 20k or even more to be successful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing with AWA is that USCIS heavily leans on the side of caution and the onus will be on you to show that it does not fall under the AWA.

Failing that, a waiver is needed. That can take years and will likely cost several Edit: few tens of thousands.

Edited by geowrian

Timelines:

ROC:

Spoiler

7/27/20: Sent forms to Dallas lockbox, 7/30/20: Received by USCIS, 8/10 NOA1 electronic notification received, 8/1/ NOA1 hard copy received

AOS:

Spoiler

AOS (I-485 + I-131 + I-765):

9/25/17: sent forms to Chicago, 9/27/17: received by USCIS, 10/4/17: NOA1 electronic notification received, 10/10/17: NOA1 hard copy received. Social Security card being issued in married name (3rd attempt!)

10/14/17: Biometrics appointment notice received, 10/25/17: Biometrics

1/2/18: EAD + AP approved (no website update), 1/5/18: EAD + AP mailed, 1/8/18: EAD + AP approval notice hardcopies received, 1/10/18: EAD + AP received

9/5/18: Interview scheduled notice, 10/17/18: Interview

10/24/18: Green card produced notice, 10/25/18: Formal approval, 10/31/18: Green card received

K-1:

Spoiler

I-129F

12/1/16: sent, 12/14/16: NOA1 hard copy received, 3/10/17: RFE (IMB verification), 3/22/17: RFE response received

3/24/17: Approved! , 3/30/17: NOA2 hard copy received

 

NVC

4/6/2017: Received, 4/12/2017: Sent to Riyadh embassy, 4/16/2017: Case received at Riyadh embassy, 4/21/2017: Request case transfer to Manila, approved 4/24/2017

 

K-1

5/1/2017: Case received by Manila (1 week embassy transfer??? Lucky~)

7/13/2017: Interview: APPROVED!!!

7/19/2017: Visa in hand

8/15/2017: POE

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

A post not contributing to answering the OP's query has been removed.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: New Zealand
Timeline
23 hours ago, Matt&Ali said:

Have you had any news since October? With the amount of reading I did on this yesterday including reading the entire Act, it seems once you fall into the category, even if its Tier 1, that preparing for a denial is something my fiance and I really need to prepare and plan for. 

We have heard nothing since Oct. The longer wait has not been easy so I planned a visit.  

 

I think it's best to look at every possible scenario.  Be ready and prepared for whatever uscis decides 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline
On 1/30/2020 at 10:59 AM, Matt&Ali said:

Hi all,

My fiance was arrested in a sting operation for importuning back in 2005. He was on the sex offender list for 10 years. The petition was filed with his paperwork, as required.

We had the completed petition forms  reviewed by an immigration lawyer who said the petition should be fine. We filed for the K1 in September and received a letter early this month to say the case had been preliminary reviewed and was transferred from CSC to VSC as part of the processing.

I just learned about the AWA and I would really like to know where others here think we stand in terms of getting approval.

 

 

 

I find it a bit odd that an immigration attny would look over your petition with an AWA issue and say it should be fine. Did you pay that attny? Was it a free consult? Did they say specifically 'why' it should be fine? 

 

AWA issues are usually very complex. There are many factors to consider like the exact charge/conviction, the age of the victim, the exact circumstances, and his age at the time. Was he over the age of 14 at the time? If not that could be a reason why the attny said it should be fine. Anyway when a petition is flagged for being possible AWA issue it does get sent to VSC as they are the ones who process AWAs. At some point he should get a biometrics notice and will need to go for fingerprints. Generally speaking if it is an AWA case the chances for approval are very very slim. There are several threads on AWA here in the IMBRA subforum you should read through. Here is a website dedicated to AWA issues- https://fightawa.org/uscis-awa-decision-pdf-files they also have pdf files on USCIS decisions you can read through. This link has some general information- http://myattorneyusa.com/adam-walsh-act-prohibition-on-approval-of-family-iv-petition-where-petitioner-was-convicted-of As you can see there are various ways of dealing with AWA issues. Some people attempt to fight if it should be considered as AWA. If thats not possible then your only defense is to show no risk which is very hard to prove. They generally deny apx 99% of AWA cases. Statistics are not published but I believe in 2019 apx 5 cases were approved out of the pending (apx 1500) While thats not much by any means it was a significant rise in approvals from prior years.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Ireland
Timeline
On 1/31/2020 at 7:33 PM, Villanelle said:

I find it a bit odd that an immigration attny would look over your petition with an AWA issue and say it should be fine. Did you pay that attny? Was it a free consult? Did they say specifically 'why' it should be fine? 

 

AWA issues are usually very complex. There are many factors to consider like the exact charge/conviction, the age of the victim, the exact circumstances, and his age at the time. Was he over the age of 14 at the time? If not that could be a reason why the attny said it should be fine. Anyway when a petition is flagged for being possible AWA issue it does get sent to VSC as they are the ones who process AWAs. At some point he should get a biometrics notice and will need to go for fingerprints. Generally speaking if it is an AWA case the chances for approval are very very slim. There are several threads on AWA here in the IMBRA subforum you should read through. Here is a website dedicated to AWA issues- https://fightawa.org/uscis-awa-decision-pdf-files they also have pdf files on USCIS decisions you can read through. This link has some general information- http://myattorneyusa.com/adam-walsh-act-prohibition-on-approval-of-family-iv-petition-where-petitioner-was-convicted-of As you can see there are various ways of dealing with AWA issues. Some people attempt to fight if it should be considered as AWA. If thats not possible then your only defense is to show no risk which is very hard to prove. They generally deny apx 99% of AWA cases. Statistics are not published but I believe in 2019 apx 5 cases were approved out of the pending (apx 1500) While thats not much by any means it was a significant rise in approvals from prior years.

 

 

Thank you very much for this. It's clear now that we need specialised legal advice to see where we may stand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...
 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...