married what visa?

[Crazy Cat 41,836]

2 hours ago, Anna Watson said:

Definitely.

1.  The "trick" for speeding up the I-130 process only worked for Nebraska......and has since, stopped working from what I have seen.

2.  There is almost a 0% chance for getting a K-3 as explained by others.

3.  A K-3 (in the unlikely event it was issued) would require adjustment of status.  Do you really want your husband to have to file an I-485?  

 

Note:  New immigrants who must file for adjustment of status will likely be subject to the new public charge expansion.

[Just Paul 4,595]

1 minute ago, missileman said:

A K-3 (in the unlikely event it was issued) would require adjustment of status.  Do you really want your husband to have to file an I-485?  

 

I'd really like to see USCIS start approving K3 petitions so we can hear how miserable the beneficiary is having to AOS.

 

[SalishSea 17,818]

34 minutes ago, missileman said:

1.  The "trick" for speeding up the I-130 process only worked for Nebraska......and has since, stopped working from what I have seen.

2.  There is almost a 0% chance for getting a K-3 as explained by others.

3.  A K-3 (in the unlikely event it was issued) would require adjustment of status.  Do you really want your husband to have to file an I-485?  

 

Note:  New immigrants who must file for adjustment of status will likely be subject to the new public charge expansion.

Best advice on this thread.

[Anna Watson 1]

46 minutes ago, missileman said:

1.  The "trick" for speeding up the I-130 process only worked for Nebraska......and has since, stopped working from what I have seen.

2.  There is almost a 0% chance for getting a K-3 as explained by others.

3.  A K-3 (in the unlikely event it was issued) would require adjustment of status.  Do you really want your husband to have to file an I-485?  

 

Note:  New immigrants who must file for adjustment of status will likely be subject to the new public charge expansion.

Its really a hit and miss. What works for some might not work for another. I am in a Group on fb and a member filed i29f after her i130 and it was denied but her i130 was approved in less than a year. Prob between 4- 6months

[SalishSea 17,818]

1 minute ago, Anna Watson said:

Its really a hit and miss. What works for some might not work for another. I am in a Group on fb and a member filed i29f after her i130 and it was denied but her i130 was approved in less than a year. Prob between 4- 6months

Yes.  That person is also a member here.  The point is that we haven't seen any post-October 2019 cases.

[Crazy Cat 41,836]

1 minute ago, Anna Watson said:

Its really a hit and miss. What works for some might not work for another. I am in a Group on fb and a member filed i29f after her i130 and it was denied but her i130 was approved in less than a year. Prob between 4- 6months

I'm not sure, but I think that trick stopped working in September or October......if I remember correctly........but there is no harm in trying...unless they actually issue a K-3......good luck.

[dwheels76 5,468]

5 hours ago, Bill & Katya said:

Yes, the I129 has a separate fee.

 

Good Luck!

There is no fee for the I-129F when there is a I-130 filed.

[dwheels76 5,468]

1 hour ago, Anna Watson said:

Its really a hit and miss. What works for some might not work for another. I am in a Group on fb and a member filed i29f after her i130 and it was denied but her i130 was approved in less than a year. Prob between 4- 6months

Yes that was back in September. The last I have seen of this approval thing was in November and I am in a bunch of these groups also and there's nothing. There's a group on Facebook just for K3 filers and nothing since November

[LilyJ 1,258]

As others have said, the I129f trick seems to have stopped working after October. The last approvals I had seen from it were in September-October and anyone who's filed since October or later has not heard anything yet. IOEs (the new system which every I130 is now part of) who filed I129f at any time haven't heard anything either

[HRQX 4,145]

On 1/28/2020 at 5:57 PM, LilyJ said:

Last year there were only 4 issued

Missed one, lol: https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/legal/visa-law0/visa-statistics/nonimmigrant-visa-statistics/monthly-nonimmigrant-visa-issuances.html

In fiscal year 2019 there were five: https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/Statistics/Non-Immigrant-Statistics/MonthlyNIVIssuances/October 2018 - NIV Issuances by Post and Visa Class.pdf Page 95

Or, in calendar year 2019 there were five (assuming zero in December): https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/Statistics/Non-Immigrant-Statistics/MonthlyNIVIssuances/NOVEMBER 2019 - NIV Issuances by Post and Visa Class.pdf Page 28

 

Interesting note: For Oct '19 and Nov '19, they explicitly reported "0" for Kabul and San Salvador, respectively. Maybe approved I-129F were sent to those embassies and applicants filed DS-160, but the COs still denied the K-3 visas?

Edited January 30, 2020 by HRQX

[geowrian 22,337]

25 minutes ago, HRQX said:

Interesting note: For Oct '19 and Nov '19, they explicitly reported "0" for Kabul and San Salvador, respectively. Maybe approved I-129F were sent to those embassies and applicants filed DS-160, but the COs still denied the K-3 visas?

Certainly possible. Or they refused to even interview them?

The refusal rate for K-3s since they became mostly obsolete is extremely high. For FY18, it was 62% overall (82% initial refusals): https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/Statistics/Non-Immigrant-Statistics/NIVWorkload/FY2018NIVWorkloadbyVisaCategory.pdf

[Just Paul 4,595]

8 minutes ago, geowrian said:

Certainly possible. Or they refused to even interview them?

The refusal rate for K-3s since they became mostly obsolete is extremely high. For FY18, it was 62% overall (82% initial refusals): https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/Statistics/Non-Immigrant-Statistics/NIVWorkload/FY2018NIVWorkloadbyVisaCategory.pdf

That is a scarry refusal rate for K1s, especially since the petition goes thru USCIS.  Granted USCIS is primarily looking at the petitioner and free to marry, etc.  

I wonder how many of those are solely because of I-134 issues.

[geowrian 22,337]

18 minutes ago, Paul & Mary said:

That is a scarry refusal rate for K1s, especially since the petition goes thru USCIS.  Granted USCIS is primarily looking at the petitioner and free to marry, etc.  

I wonder how many of those are solely because of I-134 issues.

K-3*