Jump to content
90DayFinancier

Bolton alleges in book that Trump tied Ukraine aid to investigations

 Share

61 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: O-2 Visa Country: Sweden
Timeline

 

 

President Trump's former national security adviser John Bolton alleges in his forthcoming book that the president explicitly told him "he wanted to continue freezing $391 million in security assistance to Ukraine until officials there helped with investigations into Democrats including the Bidens," the New York Times first reported.

Why this matters: The revelations present a dramatic eleventh-hour turn in Trump's Senate impeachment trial. They directly contradict Trump's claim that he never tied the holdup of Ukrainian aid to his demands for investigations into his political opponent Joe Biden. Trump strongly denied Bolton's claims early Monday.

  • Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer has already seized on the story, tweeting: "John Bolton has the evidence. It's up to four Senate Republicans to ensure that John Bolton, Mick Mulvaney, and the others with direct knowledge of President Trump's actions testify in the Senate trial."
  • The seven House impeachment managers echoed those sentiments, saying in a joint statement: "There is no defensible reason to wait until his book is published, when the information he has to offer is critical to the most important decision senators must now make — whether to convict the president of impeachable offenses."

What's new: Sarah Tinsley, an adviser to Bolton, told me: "The ambassador's manuscript was transmitted to the White House for pre-publication review by the NSC. The ambassador has not passed the draft manuscript to anyone else. Period. It was sent over there, to the NSC, several weeks ago."

https://www.axios.com/john-bolton-book-donald-trump-ukraine-24b80e2b-4460-4550-9c2d-333b9821d5dc.html?_gl=1*1lq08jt*_ga*YW1wLThpSjBOUG5vMEJnckNSVU1yZEhpODVibmJqeThzdzZlMHlybjBNY0FDYk1VWF9sTWNCYUxMalJYZ2U4MjN0OVM.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: O-2 Visa Country: Sweden
Timeline

Romney says 'increasingly likely' GOP senators will back witnesses at Trump trial after Bolton revelations

 

 

At least four Republicans would need to support Democrats' call for testimony in a vote expected later this week.

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-impeachment-inquiry/gop-senators-under-pressure-witness-testimony-trump-trial-after-bolton-n1123776

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
5 minutes ago, 90DayFinancier said:

This will be enough to Garner votes to have him testify. The plot thickens.

The plot thickens?  Considering Trump responded to this, maybe the defense thinks Bolton will not hurt them in exchange for some other witnesses.  Gotta love political quid pro quos.

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: O-2 Visa Country: Sweden
Timeline
37 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

The plot thickens?  Considering Trump responded to this, maybe the defense thinks Bolton will not hurt them in exchange for some other witnesses.  Gotta love political quid pro quos.

Didn't we agree that Trump has the propensity to lie on yesterday's thread?

Regardless, Mitch McConnell's wish for a speedy trial with no evidence or witnesses appears to be fading.

 

 

Edited by 90DayFinancier
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

Omarosa* alleged things, too.

   *uh, who?

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
19 minutes ago, 90DayFinancier said:

Didn't we agree that Trump has the propensity to lie on yesterday's thread?

Regardless, Mitch McConnell's wish for a speedy trial with no evidence or witnesses appears to be fading.

 

 

I would think Sanders, Warren and the other one would also hope for a speedy trial.  Yes, politicians lie, Adam Schiff is the poster boy to that fact as it looks so much worse when one is lying constantly and a conspiracy nut.

 

Btw, how do you know that this will change anything?  The President's defense team has just started, they may use this in their defense, heck, it may have even been orchestrated.  If they call witnesses, fine, you do understand that all testimony from any witness will be behind closed door right? 

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: O-2 Visa Country: Sweden
Timeline
52 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

I would think Sanders, Warren and the other one would also hope for a speedy trial.  Yes, politicians lie, Adam Schiff is the poster boy to that fact as it looks so much worse when one is lying constantly and a conspiracy nut.

 

Btw, how do you know that this will change anything?  The President's defense team has just started, they may use this in their defense, heck, it may have even been orchestrated.  If they call witnesses, fine, you do understand that all testimony from any witness will be behind closed door right? 

Well you are right that the leak of the transcript most definitely came from the administration. Whether it  was a rouge agent or a deliberately planted leak is the question.

 

What would Trump gain in having this transcript out early? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline
45 minutes ago, 90DayFinancier said:

Well you are right that the leak of the transcript most definitely came from the administration. Whether it  was a rouge agent or a deliberately planted leak is the question.

 

What would Trump gain in having this transcript out early? 

Mary Kay?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, ALFKAD said:

Mary Kay?

Probably meant agents plural. The star crossed lovers united behind "its her turn" rouge rendezvous. 

 

❤️❤️❤️❤️ ❤️ ❤️ ❤️ ❤️ ❤️ ❤️ ❤️  ❤️ ❤️ ❤️ ❤️ ❤️ ❤️ ❤️ ❤️ ❤️ ❤️ ❤️ ❤️ ❤️ ❤️ ❤️ ❤️ 

V7tvwHg.jpg

 ❤️ ❤️ ❤️❤️ ❤️ ❤️ ❤️ ❤️ ❤️ ❤️  ❤️ ❤️  ❤️ ❤️ ❤️ ❤️  ❤️ ❤️ ❤️ ❤️ ❤️ ❤️ ❤️ ❤️ ❤️ ❤️ 

 

Edited by Burnt Reynolds
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
3 hours ago, 90DayFinancier said:

Well you are right that the leak of the transcript most definitely came from the administration. Whether it  was a rouge agent or a deliberately planted leak is the question.

 

What would Trump gain in having this transcript out early? 

When you speak of the leak of the call are you talking about the politically biased interpretation that someone made about the call that they heard second hand?  Most of us played Chinese Whispers as a game back in elementary school.

 

The administration actually released the transcript or summary of the call, it really was not a leak.

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: O-2 Visa Country: Sweden
Timeline
49 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

When you speak of the leak of the call are you talking about the politically biased interpretation that someone made about the call that they heard second hand?  Most of us played Chinese Whispers as a game back in elementary school.

 

The administration actually released the transcript or summary of the call, it really was not a leak.

The transcript of Bolton's book. It was under review by the Whitehouse for security purposes. It was not meant to be put in the hands of the Times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...