Lev Parnas: Devin Nunes was 'involved in getting all this stuff on Biden'

[90DayFinancier 910]

https://theweek.com/speedreads/889822/lev-parnas-devin-nunes-involved-getting-all-stuff-biden

 

 

[90DayFinancier 910]

https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/15/politics/lev-parnas-trump-ukraine/index.html

Lev Parnas, a Ukrainian associate of President Donald Trump's personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani, told MSNBC's Rachel Maddow, in an exclusive interview airing Wednesday, that the president was aware of and involved with his actions connected to a pressure campaign in Ukraine at every step of the way.

Specifically, Parnas and Giuliani were instrumental in Trump's efforts to strong-arm Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky into publicly committing to investigations that would be beneficial to Trump's reelection campaign.

Parnas and one of Giuliani's other associates, Igor Fruman, were arrested and charged last year with violating campaign-finance laws connected to their work for Giuliani. They pleaded not guilty to the charges against them, and Parnas has since embarked on a media campaign to cooperate with the ongoing impeachment proceedings against the president.

[90DayFinancier 910]

Parnas directly implicates president in first TV interview: salon.com

 

Lev Parnas: 'Attorney General Barr was basically on the team.' msnbc.com

 

Parnas used access to Trump’s world to help push shadow Ukraine effort, new documents show washingtonpost.com

[90DayFinancier 910]

Devin Nunes Now Remembers Call With Lev Parnas

https://www.thedailybeast.com/devin-nunes-now-remembers-call-with-lev-parnas

[Dashinka 24,500]

Didn't Rachel Maddow have the Trump tax returns at one time?  Sounds like the Dems now have Mr. Parnas in their hip pocket who will say anything to avoid jail.  Very believable, almost as much as anything that comes out of Adam Schiff's or Nancy Pelosi's mouths.

 

Btw, didn't Nadler state on national TV that the Democrats in the House have a solid case as is?  I guess there is no need for additional witnesses.

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

1 hour ago, Bill & Katya said:

Didn't Rachel Maddow have the Trump tax returns at one time?  Sounds like the Dems now have Mr. Parnas in their hip pocket who will say anything to avoid jail.  Very believable, almost as much as anything that comes out of Adam Schiff's or Nancy Pelosi's mouths.

 

Btw, didn't Nadler state on national TV that the Democrats in the House have a solid case as is?  I guess there is no need for additional witnesses.

Yeah from 2005.

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

1 hour ago, Bill & Katya said:

Didn't Rachel Maddow have the Trump tax returns at one time?  Sounds like the Dems now have Mr. Parnas in their hip pocket who will say anything to avoid jail.  Very believable, almost as much as anything that comes out of Adam Schiff's or Nancy Pelosi's mouths.

 

Btw, didn't Nadler state on national TV that the Democrats in the House have a solid case as is?  I guess there is no need for additional witnesses.

They do this for everyone, get the left all excited, nothing happens. 

[90DayFinancier 910]

2 hours ago, Bill & Katya said:

Didn't Rachel Maddow have the Trump tax returns at one time?  Sounds like the Dems now have Mr. Parnas in their hip pocket who will say anything to avoid jail.  Very believable, almost as much as anything that comes out of Adam Schiff's or Nancy Pelosi's mouths.

 

Btw, didn't Nadler state on national TV that the Democrats in the House have a solid case as is?  I guess there is no need for additional witnesses.

It is easier to attack the sources when one cannot address the facts.   Is this man sketchy? Yup. Is that why he was sought out do this dirty work?  Probably. Does that mean his story is false? No it doesn't necessarily follow.

 

 

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,370]

2 hours ago, Burnt Reynolds said:

They do this for everyone, get the left all excited, nothing happens. 

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

1 hour ago, 90DayFinancier said:

It is easier to attack the sources when one cannot address the facts.   Is this man sketchy? Yup. Is that why he was sought out do this dirty work?  Probably. Does that mean his story is false? No it doesn't necessarily follow.

 

 

Much like you do when anyone points out how much good Trump is doing for America, eh?  Quid pro quo, baby!!

 

But, but, orange man bad!

Edited January 16, 2020 by ALFKAD

[Dashinka 24,500]

2 hours ago, 90DayFinancier said:

It is easier to attack the sources when one cannot address the facts.   Is this man sketchy? Yup. Is that why he was sought out do this dirty work?  Probably. Does that mean his story is false? No it doesn't necessarily follow.

 

 

I heard a montage of leftist media sources this morning commenting on how Michael Avenatti was going to be the great savior and take out Donald Trump.  Parnas is just the latest in a long line of saviors.

[90DayFinancier 910]

15 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

I heard a montage of leftist media sources this morning commenting on how Michael Avenatti was going to be the great savior and take out Donald Trump.  Parnas is just the latest in a long line of saviors.

Avenatti a great savior? 

[Dashinka 24,500]

7 minutes ago, 90DayFinancier said:

Avenatti a great savior? 

Back in the day, he was everywhere and being touted as the man that was going to take down President Trump.  
 

 

Edited January 16, 2020 by Bill & Katya

[90DayFinancier 910]

6 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

Back in the day, he was everywhere and being touted as the man that was going to take down President Trump.  
 

 

I think the man is "a legend in his own mind"

[Dashinka 24,500]

Just now, 90DayFinancier said:

I think the man is "a legend in his own mind"

I would agree, and with Parnas, he smacks of someone that will say anything depending on who will give him the best deal.