Jump to content

201 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

Give up the reputation points you over-evolved bipedal primate

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline
Posted
1 minute ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

Roger...... give me platinum and you can have the points

😂

 

You need a lot more points than that for Platinum.

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

He's right, and the quid comes pro the quo.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Boiler said:

😂

 

You need a lot more points than that for Platinum.

Trigger Alert...... I am triggered and reporting you to the Simian 👌

2 minutes ago, TBoneTX said:

He's right, and the quid comes pro the quo.

That is illegal and you be impeached.......🤣

Edited by Cyberfx1024
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted
7 hours ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

Trigger Alert...... I am triggered and reporting you to the Simian

TOS our bible, make it yours

7 hours ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

That is illegal and you be impeached

I am triggered and reporting you to the Organizer!!!

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Posted
5 hours ago, TBoneTX said:

TOS our bible, make it yours

I am triggered and reporting you to the Organizer!!!

TOS is my bible as well...… 

 

Report me you can, impeached you shall be...…. 

Posted
6 hours ago, TBoneTX said:

TOS our bible, make it yours

I am triggered and reporting you to the Organizer!!!

* still out of points. Please credit my card as if I still did 

Posted
22 minutes ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

* still out of points. Please credit my card as if I still did 

Same as me. Hey @TBoneTX can you give me a IOU or something so that we can get this platinum order fulfilled?

Posted
16 hours ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

Trigger Alert...... I am triggered and reporting you to the Simian 👌

That is illegal and you be impeached.......🤣

 

  As a general rule, for quid pro quo to be considered illegal, at least one of the quid or the quo must actually be illegal. Brown nosing on a message forum probably doesn't qualify.

995507-quote-moderation-in-all-things-an

Posted
16 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

 

  As a general rule, for quid pro quo to be considered illegal, at least one of the quid or the quo must actually be illegal. Brown nosing on a message forum probably doesn't qualify.

So who ate your Wheaties this morning???? So what you are saying is that "Abuse of power" by ignoring subpoenas from Congress that has not gone through a judicial court are not actually illegal? But the Democrats told me they were illegal

Posted
1 minute ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

So who ate your Wheaties this morning???? So what you are saying is that "Abuse of power" by ignoring subpoenas from Congress that has not gone through a judicial court are not actually illegal? But the Democrats told me they were illegal

 

   Yes it can be illegal. I was saying is not inherently illegal. For example, they often offer extra to pick up overtime where I work (above the time and a half rate that is in the contract). If no one picks it up, they go higher or throw in something else of value. Quid for quo, perfectly legal.

 

  We should not over look that there is an actual legal ruling, that politicians cannot engage in certain types of quid pro quo. On of the commonly known ones is an exchange of money for political favors by an elected official. In that case the quid pro quo constitutes a bribe, which is illegal. 

995507-quote-moderation-in-all-things-an

Posted (edited)

If we're going to use a legal context, that needs to be proven beyond reasonable doubt that Trump specifically sought to benefit himself.

 

Logic flaw:

- Trump can't benefit himself, or anyone else, or else "quid pro quo"

- But pretty much any way he benefits the US, he's benefiting himself, as an American citizen and as a President facing re-election

- Therefore beyond destroying the US, pretty much anything Trump does at all is "quid pro quo"

 

Reasonable doubt:

- A VP engaging in a "quid pro quo" for his son isn't just of interest to Trump, but the USA as a whole, because it's a US crime AND deals with Ukraine corruption.

- Finding those corruptly trying to influence the 2016 elections isn't just of interest to Trump, but the USA as a whole, because that concerns US elections, likely US crimes as well. 

 

In a legal context, the idea that Trump is specifically doing this in a way to benefit personally is pretty much impossible to prove beyond reasonable doubt when the very topics directly relate to matters important to the USA, and since the President is the one who both determines that (as Chief Executive) via foreign policy, and is the key stakeholder in legislation concerning Ukraine money, this argument gets flushed just from cursory scrutiny.

 

But, of course, the articles here were not intended to get a conviction, it's the weaponized use of a political process, and political power, to try and affect the outcome of the 2020 elections.. ironically the very thing Trump is accused of.

Edited by Burnt Reynolds
Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline
Posted

How does the Clinton Family Crime Foundation fit into this?

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...