Jump to content

2,986 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 minutes ago, Ontarkie said:

Oh my goodness. They did this without even telling you. I'd be rampaging on them right now. 

 

You  did not need the added stress of fake ppl sticking their nose in your business to see what they can get for themselves.

 

Glad Herself is coming around poor girl doesn't know what is happening. 

 

 

If they think there is something in it for them, they will find slim pickings. He didn't have anything, his mother saw to that. His sister is the only inheritor, always has been.

I can explain it to you. But I can't understand it for you.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted
1 minute ago, cdneh said:

If they think there is something in it for them, they will find slim pickings. He didn't have anything, his mother saw to that. His sister is the only inheritor, always has been.

Sad group of ppl.

Spoiler

Met Playing Everquest in 2005
Engaged 9-15-2006
K-1 & 4 K-2'S
Filed 05-09-07
Interview 03-12-08
Visa received 04-21-08
Entry 05-06-08
Married 06-21-08
AOS X5
Filed 07-08-08
Cards Received01-22-09
Roc X5
Filed 10-17-10
Cards Received02-22-11
Citizenship
Filed 10-17-11
Interview 01-12-12
Oath 06-29-12

Citizenship for older 2 boys

Filed 03/08/2014

NOA/fee waiver 03/19/2014

Biometrics 04/15/14

Interview 05/29/14

In line for Oath 06/20/14

Oath 09/19/2014 We are all done! All USC no more USCIS

 

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Australia
Timeline
Posted
1 hour ago, cdneh said:

Hanging in there. Herself is coming around slowly, but still searching for her person.

 

I have been dealing with the in laws, against my wishes. It seems the crematory habitually publish a short obit online for anyone  they look after.  They were "looking up relatives this evening" and found the obit. So so sorry, what can we do?  Nothing thank you, you can do nothing for me whatsoever. It ought to be easy as that is all they ever have done. These, after all, are the people who left me to struggle on looking after Himself and the MIL for eight years with no respite. In the event we did need to leave her I had to pay for someone to stay with her.

 

His sister has rung TN, and in her voicemail asked the company to call her back, so that they can relay her contact information to me. I have her info, and I have no desire to use it. I have had an email exchange this morning with TN, and they have agreed to tell them jack. None of their business. They aren't calling her back either.

 

It isn't as though any one of them actually give a toss. Demonstrably they never have.  They are pious, sanctimonious, and I am in no mood to have added drama.

😓

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

There are always messes of some sort after major events like this, si and sigh Eh ma'am.

We admire your grit and resolve and no-intestinal-excrement-of-bulls approach, si Eh ma'am.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Denmark
Timeline
Posted
On 4/21/2020 at 10:09 AM, NikLR said:

Isn't there actual regulations on this?

Pandemics supersede OSHA, so, no. The CDC is rather a moving target of PPE recommendations as well. 

 

2 hours ago, cdneh said:

Hanging in there. Herself is coming around slowly, but still searching for her person.

 

I have been dealing with the in laws, against my wishes. It seems the crematory habitually publish a short obit online for anyone  they look after.  They were "looking up relatives this evening" and found the obit. So so sorry, what can we do?  Nothing thank you, you can do nothing for me whatsoever. It ought to be easy as that is all they ever have done. These, after all, are the people who left me to struggle on looking after Himself and the MIL for eight years with no respite. In the event we did need to leave her I had to pay for someone to stay with her.

 

His sister has rung TN, and in her voicemail asked the company to call her back, so that they can relay her contact information to me. I have her info, and I have no desire to use it. I have had an email exchange this morning with TN, and they have agreed to tell them jack. None of their business. They aren't calling her back either.

 

It isn't as though any one of them actually give a toss. Demonstrably they never have.  They are pious, sanctimonious, and I am in no mood to have added drama.

Your in-laws sound terrible, I'm sorry you are dealing with them on top of all of this.

3/2/18  E-filed N-400 under 5 year rule

3/26/18 Biometrics

7/2019-12/2019 (Yes, 16- 21 months) Estimated time to interview MSP office.

 

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

Eh ma'am, if you and Herself need company, Ontarklar certainly has a supply of chickens to give to you, si ma'am!

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Posted

Three hours sat in the dark last night, while the wind roared around the eaves.  Not wind gusts, just a steady roaring wind. Herself went to bed, and burrowed completely out of sight. It stormed most of yesterday, thunder and all, and she does not like that one bit, so the  power going out put the tin hat on it.  Myself, I sat in there with her and contemplated murder.

 

Honestly, those people. The brother in law, he would be the 'former' brother in law now, felt the need to post on FB about my husband. Except it isn't about him, is it. It's about his poor wife and her mother who had to find out about the loss of their dear son and brother on an "accidental search on the internet". How "It has been almost 3 years since his wife cut all ties from them to the family".  He's wrong. That idea wasn't strictly mine, it came from Himself. And if this wanker used his brain for thirty seconds he would remember it was not for the first time either.  He didn't have anything to do with them from 1984 until 1997 either, well before I came along.

 

And the comments. "Oh how dreadful! What a cruel person his wife must be!  He is safe in the arms of Jesus now, and away from her, that's a blessing! Our sincerest condolences to your family. So sorry your wife had to face additional suffering during such a difficult time"

 

That right there people is the stuff that keeps America green. I have about ten thousand things to say to that, but I won't. I don't believe in dragging private family business onto social media.

I can explain it to you. But I can't understand it for you.

Posted
51 minutes ago, cdneh said:

Three hours sat in the dark last night, while the wind roared around the eaves.  Not wind gusts, just a steady roaring wind. Herself went to bed, and burrowed completely out of sight. It stormed most of yesterday, thunder and all, and she does not like that one bit, so the  power going out put the tin hat on it.  Myself, I sat in there with her and contemplated murder.

 

Honestly, those people. The brother in law, he would be the 'former' brother in law now, felt the need to post on FB about my husband. Except it isn't about him, is it. It's about his poor wife and her mother who had to find out about the loss of their dear son and brother on an "accidental search on the internet". How "It has been almost 3 years since his wife cut all ties from them to the family".  He's wrong. That idea wasn't strictly mine, it came from Himself. And if this wanker used his brain for thirty seconds he would remember it was not for the first time either.  He didn't have anything to do with them from 1984 until 1997 either, well before I came along.

 

And the comments. "Oh how dreadful! What a cruel person his wife must be!  He is safe in the arms of Jesus now, and away from her, that's a blessing! Our sincerest condolences to your family. So sorry your wife had to face additional suffering during such a difficult time"

 

That right there people is the stuff that keeps America green. I have about ten thousand things to say to that, but I won't. I don't believe in dragging private family business onto social media.

What terrible people! I'm sorry.  I'd be raging as well.  Keep busy.  I have a list of things to do when my depression and/or anxiety hits.  My mom suggests beating the ####### out of pillows (feather ones) instead of people. 

You have brains in your head. You have feet in your shoes. You can steer yourself any direction you choose.  - Dr. Seuss

 

Posted
3 hours ago, cdneh said:

Three hours sat in the dark last night, while the wind roared around the eaves.  Not wind gusts, just a steady roaring wind. Herself went to bed, and burrowed completely out of sight. It stormed most of yesterday, thunder and all, and she does not like that one bit, so the  power going out put the tin hat on it.  Myself, I sat in there with her and contemplated murder.

 

Honestly, those people. The brother in law, he would be the 'former' brother in law now, felt the need to post on FB about my husband. Except it isn't about him, is it. It's about his poor wife and her mother who had to find out about the loss of their dear son and brother on an "accidental search on the internet". How "It has been almost 3 years since his wife cut all ties from them to the family".  He's wrong. That idea wasn't strictly mine, it came from Himself. And if this wanker used his brain for thirty seconds he would remember it was not for the first time either.  He didn't have anything to do with them from 1984 until 1997 either, well before I came along.

 

And the comments. "Oh how dreadful! What a cruel person his wife must be!  He is safe in the arms of Jesus now, and away from her, that's a blessing! Our sincerest condolences to your family. So sorry your wife had to face additional suffering during such a difficult time"

 

That right there people is the stuff that keeps America green. I have about ten thousand things to say to that, but I won't. I don't believe in dragging private family business onto social media.

Oh my goodness I don't know how you managed to not respond!

Himself would be so mad with them 😡

Death brings out the absolute worst in some folks, it really does :(

Everything crossed for a smooth and stress free journey

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

 Don't let the illegitimate-male-children get you down, no Eh ma'am.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted

Sad to have to agree with what trudi says.
Continuing to send the best energy & love your way Sidders.


Getting organised for revision for my online course exams.....figured out I only need to clear 67% or above in each of the two tests in order to maintain my grade.....it takes the pressure off but I'll still be pushing myself to hit as high as I can. Yeah I'm that student lol

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted
37 minutes ago, Scottish Mernymph said:

I only need to clear Many% or above in each of the two tests in order to maintain my grade

This should be easy, depending on the definition of Many%, si SM ma'am.

38 minutes ago, Scottish Mernymph said:

I'll still be pushing myself to hit as high as I can.

We recommend that you strive assiduously for Many%, si SM ma'am.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

 
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...