Analysis: Trump is gaining ground heading into 2020

[laylalex 7,284]

4 minutes ago, ALFKAD said:

Some super big font for the hearing impaired....

 

 

I want you to imagine what would happen if a police force investigated someone without allowing them the right to an attorney and then charged them with a crime but refused to hand the case over to the district attorney unless the DA agreed to the same unethical biased behavior as the police force. Welcome to our democrat party. 

Is that from Fox News because the font is so big? Or is it not regulation Fox News size.  

[Jericho 28]

7 minutes ago, ALFKAD said:

If you don’t already know, then there are no words I can waste on a forum that will educate you.  

I don't particularly like Obama's policies, but he didn't do anything that rose to the level of censure or impeachment. If you can't actually point to any specific act that he did that that warranted an impeachment, then I'm going to assume that you're a hyper partisan who listens to too much Alex Jones.

[Boiler 45,519]

We need to remember this is a political issue, not criminal, the whole process is political.

[Jericho 28]

12 minutes ago, Boiler said:

We need to remember this is a political issue, not criminal, the whole process is political.

Haven't you heard? This is a coup, as declared by a bunch of people who don't actually understand what a coup is.

[90DayFinancier 910]

49 minutes ago, ALFKAD said:

Some super big font for the hearing impaired....

 

 

I want you to imagine what would happen if a police force investigated someone without allowing them the right to an attorney and then charged them with a crime but refused to hand the case over to the district attorney unless the DA agreed to the same unethical biased behavior as the police force. Welcome to our democrat party. 

Wait...is it a requirement that the subject of the investigation is entitled to an lawyer?  I didn't know the subject needs to be notified they are being investigated. You should have an attorney present if interviewed, and if charged to plea before a judge.  The Whitehouse declined to send a representative to the house investigation and refused to provide witnesses. (Except to voir dire the whistleblower as retaliation)

Edited December 24, 2019 by 90DayFinancier

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

Is it just me having a man crush, or would Trey Gowdy be an awesome candidate for president?

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

54 minutes ago, ALFKAD said:

Is it just me having a man crush, or would Trey Gowdy be an awesome candidate for president?

Due to rationality being in short supply these days, Gowdy looks fantastic in front of the cameras (whether it be in committees, press conferences, and nowadays, interviews), but he's a career politician (with a common track from law/legal into politics), which is solidified by him retiring into the private sector using his political career as an enriching springboard. For me, huge red flags. Good sound bytes, sketchy history.

 

1 hour ago, Jericho said:

Haven't you heard? This is a coup, as declared by a bunch of people who don't actually understand what a coup is.

Soliciting people in an incoming President's cabinet to invoke the 25th amendment (which throws out a President), utilizing government power for indefinite leaks+lawfare to pressure Trump to quit, to do something that gets them impeached/removed, or as a last recourse, to utilize in a barrage of negative PR (see: Strzok's "insurance policy/leak strategy") to ruin them in the next election, is a coup. You're free to pretend this is akin to "Alex Jones", but the intent and actions are quite clear. 

Edited December 24, 2019 by Burnt Reynolds

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

1 hour ago, Burnt Reynolds said:

Due to rationality being in short supply these days, Gowdy looks fantastic in front of the cameras (whether it be in committees, press conferences, and nowadays, interviews), but he's a career politician (with a common track from law/legal into politics), which is solidified by him retiring into the private sector using his political career as an enriching springboard. For me, huge red flags. Good sound bytes, sketchy history.

Trey makes more sense than any other ten DC politicians combined.  I’d fly his red flag ANY day.

 

i challenge you to show us the “sketchy” part.

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

43 minutes ago, ALFKAD said:

Trey makes more sense than any other ten DC politicians combined.  I’d fly his red flag ANY day.

 

i challenge you to show us the “sketchy” part.

Beyond the example already given, Trey was always a huge fan of the FISA stuff that wound up used on the Trump campaign. He sat there pitching about how it was absolutely necessary, how it couldn't be used to target Americans, that Congress would hold them accountable, in the face of people warning him of the abuse it would result in. He couldn't stop fellating people like Comey, coincidentally going after those in Congress who'd try to hold Comey accountable. All of this until 2017 when this position was no longer tenable. 

Edited December 24, 2019 by Burnt Reynolds

[Dashinka 24,505]

6 hours ago, Jericho said:

Haven't you heard? This is a coup, as declared by a bunch of people who don't actually understand what a coup is.

You may want to read this.

 

https://amgreatness.com/2019/12/22/the-fbis-darkest-hour/

6 hours ago, Jericho said:

I don't particularly like Obama's policies, but he didn't do anything that rose to the level of censure or impeachment. If you can't actually point to any specific act that he did that that warranted an impeachment, then I'm going to assume that you're a hyper partisan who listens to too much Alex Jones.

So using the IRS to attack political opponents was just fine?

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,370]

10 hours ago, Jericho said:

I don't particularly like Obama's policies, but he didn't do anything that rose to the level of censure or impeachment. If you can't actually point to any specific act that he did that that warranted an impeachment, then I'm going to assume that you're a hyper partisan who listens to too much Alex Jones.

I agree. The Obama impeachment nonsense was just as much nonsense as the Trump impeachment nonsense 

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,370]

9 hours ago, ALFKAD said:

Is it just me having a man crush, or would Trey Gowdy be an awesome candidate for president?

I have a man crush on Dan Crenshaw. He would be an awesome President 

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

12 hours ago, Jericho said:

I don't particularly like Obama's policies, but he didn't do anything that rose to the level of censure or impeachment. If you can't actually point to any specific act that he did that that warranted an impeachment, then I'm going to assume that you're a hyper partisan who listens to too much Alex Jones.

Assume what you will.  We all know what that gets you.

 

My point was that Obama and Trump have done the same things.  Neither are impeachable.  It's just a joke that is backfiring on the dems.

 

Who is Alex Jones?

Edited December 24, 2019 by ALFKAD

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,370]

3 minutes ago, ALFKAD said:

Assume what you will.  We all know what that gets you.

 

My point was that Obama and Trump have done the same things.  Neither are impeachable.  It's just a joke that is backfiring on the dems.

 

Who is Alex Jones?

Not sure but i think, that was Vals crush

[TBoneTX 45,298]

On 12/24/2019 at 7:35 AM, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

Dan Crenshaw. He would be an awesome President 

Still pretty green.  He's still feeling his way around.

He still triangulates too much (wishy-washy) and has expressed some "policy-wonky" sentiments.

He's interviewed rather often on a nearby radio station.