Analysis: Trump is gaining ground heading into 2020

[Boiler 45,486]

1 minute ago, laylalex said:

LOL  

 

If I go to the Beach Goth festival next year, I will take pictures just for you. 😘 Actually, I probably won't go because (1) crowds freak me out and (2) I have seen pictures and the people who go kind of freak me out.

 

How's Trump today? (back to topic)

Waiting to be impeached.

[Dashinka 24,492]

5 minutes ago, Boiler said:

Waiting to be impeached.

The Dems are saying they may impeach him a second time.  Seems like something out of the Holy Grail at the French castle.

 

House Dems raise prospect of new impeachment articles, in court battle over McGahn testimony

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/dems-face-deadline-to-justify-mcgahn-testimony-grand-jury-material-post-impeachment

 

 

 

[laylalex 7,284]

Well, if he is committing impeachable offenses after the articles were presented and voted on, it seems that they could be investigated too.

 

And that SUPER BIG font that comes with all these Fox News articles always cracks me up.

 

Edit: or that weren't uncovered until after the articles were passed.

Edited December 24, 2019 by laylalex

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,370]

36 minutes ago, laylalex said:

Well, if he is committing impeachable offenses after the articles were presented and voted on, it seems that they could be investigated too.

 

And that SUPER BIG font that comes with all these Fox News articles always cracks me up.

 

Edit: or that weren't uncovered until after the articles were passed.

Let me know when commits an impeachable offense other than Russian collusion. oh wait never mind that was made up also

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

1 hour ago, laylalex said:

LOL  

 

If I go to the Beach Goth festival next year, I will take pictures just for you. 😘 Actually, I probably won't go because (1) crowds freak me out and (2) I have seen pictures and the people who go kind of freak me out.

 

How's Trump today? (back to topic)

He sent out another fake motorcade today.  But I am not at liberty to say which one.

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

21 minutes ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

Let me know when commits an impeachable offense other than Russian collusion. oh wait never mind that was made up also

Dude, you KNOW he cheated... the election was Hillary's ALL THE WAY!  The polls and CNN said so.  He's the worst criminal in DC in over 1,000 years.

[90DayFinancier 910]

1 hour ago, laylalex said:

Well, if he is committing impeachable offenses after the articles were presented and voted on, it seems that they could be investigated too.

 

And that SUPER BIG font that comes with all these Fox News articles always cracks me up.

 

Edit: or that weren't uncovered until after the articles were passed.

The font is super big on fox news for the hearing impaired.

[Jericho 28]

40 minutes ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

Let me know when commits an impeachable offense other than Russian collusion. oh wait never mind that was made up also

There seems to be plenty of violations of the emoluments clause, in addition to corruption. Lucky for the republicans, they have elected a gerrymandered group of boot licking sycophants, so nothing will come of a senate trial. Like President Trump said himself, he could murder someone in broad daylight in the middle of times square, and nobody would do anything about it.

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

7 minutes ago, Jericho said:

There seems to be plenty of violations of the emoluments clause, in addition to corruption. Lucky for the republicans, they have elected a gerrymandered group of boot licking sycophants, so nothing will come of a senate trial. Like President Trump said himself, he could murder someone in broad daylight in the middle of times square, and nobody would do anything about it.

Hey look we have a new person here on CEHST....  The Democrats could have went after him on the emoluments issue but they didn't, they only went after him because he went after one of the Democrats for corruption.

[90DayFinancier 910]

4 minutes ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

Hey look we have a new person here on CEHST....  The Democrats could have went after him on the emoluments issue but they didn't, they only went after him because he went after one of the Democrats for corruption.

The receipt if something of value for your campaign in exchange for political consideration is a violation of the emoluments clause in addition to the FEC violation AND abuse of power. 

 

Do you even need a verbatim crime to impeach?

 

 

 

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

10 minutes ago, 90DayFinancier said:

The receipt if something of value for your campaign in exchange for political consideration is a violation of the emoluments clause in addition to the FEC violation AND abuse of power. 

 

Do you even need a verbatim crime to impeach?

No duh.... But you went after him for "abuse of power" whatever that means. All the while Schiff is just randomly wiretapping people and then releasing those records. So no wonder he is being sued in Federal court. 

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

20 minutes ago, 90DayFinancier said:

The receipt if something of value for your campaign in exchange for political consideration is a violation of the emoluments clause in addition to the FEC violation AND abuse of power. 

 

Do you even need a verbatim crime to impeach?

 

 

 

But when Obama did it, it was ok.  And that’s what people with a conscience and uncommon sense have a problem with.

[Jericho 28]

39 minutes ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

Hey look we have a new person here on CEHST....  The Democrats could have went after him on the emoluments issue but they didn't, they only went after him because he went after one of the Democrats for corruption.

The emoluments clause violations were more regarding Trump insisting on using Trump properties for official stays. The situation with Mike Pence in Ireland was pretty egregious. But those seem to be small compared to blackmailing an ally to dig up dirt on a potential political opponent.

 

 

28 minutes ago, 90DayFinancier said:

The receipt if something of value for your campaign in exchange for political consideration is a violation of the emoluments clause in addition to the FEC violation AND abuse of power. 

 

Do you even need a verbatim crime to impeach?

 

 

 

The standard to impeach isn't the same as to convict of a state or federal crime. Article 1, section 3, Clause 7 states:

" Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States; but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law. "

14 minutes ago, ALFKAD said:

But when Obama did it, it was ok.  And that’s what people with a conscience and uncommon sense have a problem with.

What did Obama do that was a violation?

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

8 minutes ago, Jericho said:

 

What did Obama do that was a violation?

If you don’t already know, then there are no words I can waste on a forum that will educate you.  

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

Some super big font for the hearing impaired....

 

 

I want you to imagine what would happen if a police force investigated someone without allowing them the right to an attorney and then charged them with a crime but refused to hand the case over to the district attorney unless the DA agreed to the same unethical biased behavior as the police force. Welcome to our democrat party.