Jump to content

94 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
On 12/11/2019 at 9:50 AM, Boiler said:

In the footsteps, of Adolf, Stalin, Bill and of course Trump we have a new winner:

 

 

She (or whoever writes her stuff) wants to put politicians "up against the wall."  Sounds familiar.....

Edited by boris64

Finally done...

 

 

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline
Posted
2 minutes ago, boris64 said:

She wants to put politicians "up against the wall."  Sounds familiar.....

I was having problems with because there are so many who should be.

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Posted
2 minutes ago, ALFKAD said:

She meant hold them accountable when she said that.  Language differences and all that.

"Du har satt din sista potatis" (you have planted your final potato). Kind of like that?

Finally done...

 

 

Country: Vietnam
Timeline
Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, ALFKAD said:

She meant hold them accountable when she said that.  Language differences and all that.

In the revolution and Communist Russia putting people against the wall was how they held them accountability but it still meant to execute them. Never has that term ever meant as she claimed it does and mean to just put them up against the wall and let's chat about it. If she misspoke then so be it but she still said something reprehensible and shall be judged as she deserved to be.

 

Oh but she may actually be too young to have learned about much history or other concepts but that is saying she is too young to be addressing any important issues or taken seriously.

Edited by luckytxn
Filed: Timeline
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, luckytxn said:

In the revolution and Communist Russia putting people against the wall was how they held them accountability but it still meant to execute them. Never has that term ever meant as she claimed it does and mean to just put them up against the wall and let's chat about it. If she misspoke then so be it but she still said something reprehensible and shall be judged as she deserved to be.

Let's not make up drama where none exists, eh?  I doubt a teenager is calling for the execution of leaders.

 

The Swedish expession ’att ställa någon mot väggen’ literally translates to ‘put someone against the wall’, but it has no connotations of violence. It is an uncontroversial figure of speech that means to call someone out.
Edited by ALFKAD
Country: Vietnam
Timeline
Posted
1 minute ago, ALFKAD said:

Let's not make up drama where none exists, eh?  I doubt a teenager is calling for the execution of leaders.

 

 

I am not making up drama or really don't care what she spouts as I think she is a young kid being used and having her spout out what the adults tell her to do. She is probably too young to consider the concepts of climate change and make an informed decision on her own.

Filed: Timeline
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, luckytxn said:

I am not making up drama or really don't care what she spouts as I think she is a young kid being used and having her spout out what the adults tell her to do. She is probably too young to consider the concepts of climate change and make an informed decision on her own.

Oh, I agree, she is definitely a pawn.  I have seen her unscripted talks, and it's sad to realize how she is being used.  Her parents should be ashamed.

 

But I still don't think she was calling for executing anyone.

Edited by ALFKAD
Country: Vietnam
Timeline
Posted
7 minutes ago, ALFKAD said:

Oh, I agree, she is definitely a pawn.  I have seen her unscripted talks, and it's sad to realize how she is being used.  Her parents should be ashamed.

 

But I still don't think she was calling for executing anyone.

I yield to you as you are correct and I knew that also but one must introduce how serious it was saying this and we should not base our faiths and such by this child.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

Hijacking the face to be made when confronted by Big Chief Stolen Valor!  Reported!!!!!

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...