House Passes 'Historic' Bill to Restore and Expand Voting Rights "Brings us one step closer to restoring the Voting Rights Act."

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

7 minutes ago, 90DayFinancier said:

For Trump to be sworn in for a third term, the Constitution would need to be amended OR the existing constitution would need to be over thrown, undoubtedly with force and violence because public officials and military members took an oath to uphold the Constitution.  How will you achieve either goal?

Exactly what I thought. If you're going to just try and troll (can sense when you're outmatched), expect the same in return. 

 

(see sig)

Edited December 7, 2019 by Burnt Reynolds

[90DayFinancier 910]

21 minutes ago, Burnt Reynolds said:

Exactly what I thought. If you're going to just try and troll (can sense when you're outmatched), expect the same in return. 

 

(see sig)

What third logical option do you have? No rational adult believes your claim of a third term for Trump.

[Dashinka 24,800]

39 minutes ago, 90DayFinancier said:

For Trump to be sworn in for a third term, the Constitution would need to be amended OR the existing constitution would need to be over thrown, undoubtedly with force and violence because public officials and military members took an oath to uphold the Constitution.  How will you achieve either goal?

Actually, there is a way a person could be sworn in three times for President.

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

6 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

Actually, there is a way a person could be sworn in three times for President.

When trolling backfires. 

 

Edited December 7, 2019 by Burnt Reynolds

[cyclone27 710]

9 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

Actually, there is a way a person could be sworn in three times for President.

Correct - run as Vice President and then the President doesn’t fill out his term. 👍

[90DayFinancier 910]

8 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

Actually, there is a way a person could be sworn in three times for President.

The twelfth amendment outlines that the vice president must meet all of the requirements of the president to be elected. A president who has had two terms will not be qualified to run for VP. Apparently the next in succession is the Speaker of the house. So hypothetically , a straw man president and then a straw man VP could resign leaving a hypothetical Speaker of the House Donald John Trump who hypothetically would not be impeached (for two years) because a speaker of the house Trump would  belong to the majority party.

 

Like I said, no rational adult.

 

[90DayFinancier 910]

10 minutes ago, cyclone27 said:

Correct - run as Vice President and then the President doesn’t fill out his term. 👍

The VP must meet the same requirements as President to run for  VP. The two term limitation would disqualify a former President from running.

[cyclone27 710]

^sorry it doesn’t term limits are for President not Vice President 

[Dashinka 24,800]

9 minutes ago, 90DayFinancier said:

The twelfth amendment outlines that the vice president must meet all of the requirements of the president to be elected. A president who has had two terms will not be qualified to run for VP. Apparently the next in succession is the Speaker of the house. So hypothetically , a straw man president and then a straw man VP could resign leaving a hypothetical Speaker of the House Donald John Trump who hypothetically would not be impeached (for two years) because a speaker of the house Trump would  belong to the majority party.

 

Like I said, no rational adult.

 

The 25th amendment allows for a VP taking over after the halfway point of a four year term can run for two additional terms of their own.  Impeach Trump, we can have Pence for nine plus years.

[90DayFinancier 910]

11 minutes ago, cyclone27 said:

^sorry it doesn’t term limits are for President not Vice President 

I am not a constitutional scholar, maybe you are. 

 

The twelfth amendment makes it clear that to run for VP you must meet all of the requirements. It did not say all of the requirements that were set out at the time the twelfth amendment was written. If they are not qualified to run for president, they are not qualified to run for VP. 

 

You know at least one big  "purple" state would challenge the paperwork filing that included a VP Donald Trump.

[laylalex 7,300]

4 hours ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

He might have said you are full of kindness. 

How do you know ####### is ngative .

Well, unless he said "boobies" in its forbidden form it's unlikely to be nice. ☹

 

I'm also disappointed in the person (who knows who he is) who gave a like to that personal attack. Would you give a like to someone who was encouraging another person to violate immigration law, which is also against the TOS?

[Steeleballz 7,550]

53 minutes ago, Burnt Reynolds said:

When trolling backfires. 

 

 

 

   Weren't you told not to do stuff like this before your previous account got closed?

[Dashinka 24,800]

7 minutes ago, laylalex said:

Well, unless he said "boobies" in its forbidden form it's unlikely to be nice. ☹

 

I'm also disappointed in the person (who knows who he is) who gave a like to that personal attack. Would you give a like to someone who was encouraging another person to violate immigration law, which is also against the TOS?

That is just a guess on your part.  Sort of like all of Schiff and Nadler’s “witnesses”.

[laylalex 7,300]

Just now, Bill & Katya said:

That is just a guess on your part.  Sort of like all of Schiff and Nadler’s “witnesses”.

Context is important. I am pretty sure he didn't say I was full of sunshine and unicorn farts, even if that is true. 

 

I could always report the post, but I won't.

[90DayFinancier 910]

1 minute ago, Bill & Katya said:

That is just a guess on your part.  Sort of like all of Schiff and Nadler’s “witnesses”.

Instead of taking that approach , why don't you respond to the examples of voter rights suppression that you asked for.