Melania Trump: Lawyer who invoked Barron Trump's name for laughs at impeachment hearing 'should be ashamed'

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,370]

 

Let me summarize today for you. They rolled out a bunch of left wing professors, who are Trump haters to give their opinion. Of course we have not heard anything but opinion since it started

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/melania-trump-barron-lawyer-pamela-karlan-ashamed

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,370]

Little background

Pamela Karlan is a bisexual, Extreme liberal Trump hater, who was on the short list to be nominated to the SCOTUS by Obama but was deemed to be to radical. 

 

Why was such an extreme partisan person called to testify as to her an opinion.

 

this is nothing more than thinly disguised coup attempt

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,370]

https://www.opensecrets.org/search?q=pamela+karlan&type=donors

 

Displaying 1 - 26 of 26 records

Category	Contributor	Occupation	Date	Amount	Recipient
Money to Candidates	KARLAN, PAMELA STANFORD, CA 94305	STANFORD UNIVERSITY	09-06-2007	$250.00	Obama, Barack (D)
Money to Parties	KARLAN, PAMELA STANFORD, CA 94305		10-26-2006	$500.00	Democratic Senatorial Campaign Cmte (D)
Money to Candidates	KARLAN, PAMELA STANFORD, CA 94305	STANFORD UNIVERSITY	10-04-2018	$250.00	Heitkamp, Heidi (D)
Money to Candidates	KARLAN, PAMELA STANFORD, CA 94305	STANFORD UNIVERSITY	10-04-2018	$250.00	McCaskill, Claire (D)
Money to Candidates	KARLAN, PAMELA STANFORD, CA 94305	STANFORD UNIVERSITY	10-31-2016	$250.00	Feingold, Russ (D)
Money to Candidates	KARLAN, PAMELA STANFORD, CA 94305	STANFORD UNIVERSITY	07-31-2008	$1,000.00	Obama, Barack (D)
Money to Candidates	KARLAN, PAMELA STANFORD, CA 94305	STANFORD UNIVERSITY	12-02-2007	$2,000.00	Clinton, Hillary (D)
Money to Candidates	KARLAN, PAMELA STANFORD, CA 94305	STANFORD UNIVERSITY	09-29-2018	$250.00	Donnelly, Joe (D)
Money to Candidates	KARLAN, PAMELA STANFORD, CA 94305	STANFORD UNIVERSITY	10-28-2016	$250.00	Duckworth, Tammy (D)
Money to Candidates	KARLAN, PAMELA STANFORD, CA 94305	STANFORD UNIVERSITY	11-07-2017	$500.00	Jones, Doug (D)
Money to Candidates	KARLAN, PAMELA STANFORD, CA 94305	STANFORD UNIVERSITY	11-07-2017	$500.00	Jones, Doug (D)
Money to Candidates	KARLAN, PAMELA STANFORD, CA 94305	STANFORD UNIVERSITY	10-29-2010	$250.00	Boxer, Barbara (D)
Money to Candidates	KARLAN, PAMELA STANFORD, CA 94305	STANFORD UNIVERSITY	09-29-2018	$250.00	Watson, Liz (D)
Money to Candidates	KARLAN, PAMELA STANFORD, CA 94305	STANFORD UNIVERSITY	07-16-2018	$250.00	Watson, Liz (D)
Money to Candidates	KARLAN, PAMELA STANFORD, CA 94305	STANFORD UNIVERSITY	10-28-2016	$250.00	Hassan, Maggie (D)
Money to Candidates	KARLAN, PAMELA STANFORD, CA 94305	Stanford University	07-29-2019	$500.00	Warren, Elizabeth (D)
Money to Candidates	KARLAN, PAMELA STANFORD, CA 94305	Stanford University	07-29-2019	$500.00	Warren, Elizabeth (D)
Money to Parties	KARLAN, PAMELA S CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22903	UNIV OF VIRGINIA LAW SCHOOL	06-28-1996	$250.00	Democratic Congressional Campaign Cmte (D)
Money to Parties	KARLAN, PAMELA S CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22903	UNIVERSITY OF VA LAW SCHOOL	11-22-1995	$500.00	Democratic Congressional Campaign Cmte (D)
Money to Candidates	KARLAN, PAMELA S CHARLOTTSVILLE, VA 22903	UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA	07-15-1996	$250.00	McKinney, Cynthia (D)
Money to Candidates	KARLAN, PAMELA S CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902	UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA	06-26-1996	$250.00	Gantt, Harvey B (D)
Money to Candidates	KARLAN, PAMELA S STANFORD, CA 94305	STANFORD UNIVERSITY	09-29-2017	$250.00	Sedillo Lopez, Antoinette (D)
Money to Candidates	KARLAN, PAMELA S STANFORD, CA 94305	STANFORD UNIVERSITY	07-25-2011	$250.00	Esty, Elizabeth (D)
Money to Parties	KARLAN, PAMELA S STANFORD, CA 94305	STANFORD UNIVERSITY	10-31-2012	$250.00	Democratic Congressional Campaign Cmte (D)
Money to Parties	KARLAN, PAMELA S STANFORD, CA 94305	STANFORD UNIVERSITY	06-26-2012	$500.00	Democratic Congressional Campaign Cmte (D)
Money to Candidates	KARLAN, PAMELA S MS CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902		01-16-1996	$350.00	Gantt, Harvey B (D)

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

Usually charades were put on by the media, now they're fully on display wasting taxpayer money and time in Congressional hearings. I didn't think it was possible for Congress' image to get worse, but I bet it does. If this impeachment process was anything but a joke, this entire panel doesn't happen.

Edited December 5, 2019 by Burnt Reynolds

[TBoneTX 45,299]

If anyone still doubted the appellation of "unhinged," this person's words epitomized that term.

[Dashinka 24,505]

From the clips I have seen of Karlan, she was clearly showing her biased hatred along with the other two (she was the worst).  It was interesting to see the Dems did not ask Turley any questions at all showing their extreme partisan bias and Trump hatred.  I wonder how the Dems square the difference of OPINION among these four scholars?

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

15 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

From the clips I have seen of Karlan, she was clearly showing her biased hatred along with the other two (she was the worst).  It was interesting to see the Dems did not ask Turley any questions at all showing their extreme partisan bias and Trump hatred.  I wonder how the Dems square the difference of OPINION among these four scholars?

"Trump committed an impeachable offense by tweeting."

 

That was the best one. 😂

 

They obviously don't believe this, but it's a show they're putting on (leading questions, reaffirming the same subjective viewpoint over and over, soliciting outrage, etc.) for the people that portray themselves intellectuals but are, by their actions, nowhere near intellectual.

Edited December 5, 2019 by Burnt Reynolds

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/matt-gaetz-grills-impeachment-witnesses-barron-trump-democrat-donors

 

Starts getting good around 3:00.  Really good around 4:00.

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

39 minutes ago, ALFKAD said:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/matt-gaetz-grills-impeachment-witnesses-barron-trump-democrat-donors

 

Starts getting good around 3:00.  Really good around 4:00.

Any guesses why the left's spidey senses aren't going off when they see these donor lists and these people being used in an impeachment proceeding? The same way the left's spidey senses didn't go off when a political circus was used against Kavanaugh in a similar fashion? The same way they left's spidey senses don't go off when discussing censorship of people online?

 

These people are all taking the left for a ride. That's why they can fill up a hearing full of three handpicked professors to sit there and ask them questions about their feelings of Trump breaking the law, rather than materially cite any laws he's actually broken. The left are mentally compromised and this is being used against them by people training the left to normalize the undermining of basic freedoms all to facilitate their Id-like desires to get their way, as soon as possible, by any means necessary.

[Dashinka 24,505]

9 minutes ago, Burnt Reynolds said:

Any guesses why the left's spidey senses aren't going off when they see these donor lists and these people being used in an impeachment proceeding? The same way the left's spidey senses didn't go off when a political circus was used against Kavanaugh in a similar fashion? The same way they left's spidey senses don't go off when discussing censorship of people online?

 

These people are all taking the left for a ride. That's why they can fill up a hearing full of three handpicked professors to sit there and ask them questions about their feelings of Trump breaking the law, rather than materially cite any laws he's actually broken. The left are mentally compromised and this is being used against them by people training the left to normalize the undermining of basic freedoms all to facilitate their Id-like desires to get their way, as soon as possible, by any means necessary.

That was the best part of Gaetz's time, when he asked anyone to raise their hand if they had any material fact.  I am wondering where all this Leftist moral outrage was when Obama was weaponizing the IRS for his own personal political benefit. 

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

5 hours ago, Burnt Reynolds said:

Any guesses why the left's spidey senses aren't going off when they see these donor lists and these people being used in an impeachment proceeding? The same way the left's spidey senses didn't go off when a political circus was used against Kavanaugh in a similar fashion? The same way they left's spidey senses don't go off when discussing censorship of people online?

 

These people are all taking the left for a ride. That's why they can fill up a hearing full of three handpicked professors to sit there and ask them questions about their feelings of Trump breaking the law, rather than materially cite any laws he's actually broken. The left are mentally compromised and this is being used against them by people training the left to normalize the undermining of basic freedoms all to facilitate their Id-like desires to get their way, as soon as possible, by any means necessary.

Oops, left out at the end, these people using the left's Id-like desires/behavior to get their way, steering it in a direction that benefits those people. Hence, taking them for a ride. The media gleefully report on it, other media outlets take it up, and conveniently, winds up as citations on Wikipedia articles, like one giant (removed for tos) circular reasoning of confirmation bias where facts and critical thinking no longer exists. 

Edited December 5, 2019 by Ban Hammer

[Dashinka 24,505]

5 hours ago, Burnt Reynolds said:

Oops, left out at the end, these people using the left's Id-like desires/behavior to get their way, steering it in a direction that benefits those people. Hence, taking them for a ride. The media gleefully report on it, other media outlets take it up, and conveniently, winds up as citations on Wikipedia articles, like one giant (removed for tos) circular reasoning of confirmation bias where facts and critical thinking no longer exists. 

Heck, if you listen to the mainstream media today, they make it look like Turley wasn't even there.  They have no idea how to deal with dissent from a person that is not a Trump supporter/cultist/deplorable.

 

Edited December 5, 2019 by Ban Hammer

[Ban Hammer 13,342]

one post and one quoting have been edited to remove a non-family friendly term.  refrain from repeat behavior.