Barr rejects key finding in report on Russia probe: report

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,370]

1 hour ago, 90DayFinancier said:

Look,

You may not like the name Democratic, but that is the proper name. You don't put Chevr gas in your tank, you don't go to Cost warehouse store and you don't eat cherri breakfast cerebral.

Proper names matter.

 

 

I am not impressed with how either Party is run. Just look at the removal of the  choice of primary voters in South Carolina and Georgia. Voters are forced to vote for Trump.

I swear i didnt hack his account 

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,370]

1 hour ago, 90DayFinancier said:

Look,

You may not like the name Democratic, but that is the proper name. You don't put Chevr gas in your tank, you don't go to Cost warehouse store and you don't eat cherri breakfast cerebral.

Proper names matter.

 

 

I am not impressed with how either Party is run. Just look at the removal of the  choice of primary voters in South Carolina and Georgia. Voters are forced to vote for Trump.

I live in ga and didnt have to vote for Trump. What foolishness is this ?

[90DayFinancier 910]

1 minute ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

I live in ga and didnt have to vote for Trump. What foolishness is this ?

This just in, and they already cashed Weld's check!

 

Trump to be Sole Candidate on Ga. GOP Primary Ballot

(Alex Brandon/AP)

By Jeffrey Rodack
Tuesday, 03 Dec 2019 12:39 PM
 

        

Join in the Discussion!

 

---

 

President Donald Trump will be the only candidate on the ballot for the Georgia Republican presidential primary, the state's GOP Chairman David Shafer said on Tuesday.

According to The Hill, Schafer announced that the State Executive Committee had considered five candidates for consideration. It voted to have Trump’s name on the ballot and did not approve any other candidates.

He said Trump was the “only candidate with any significant level of support” among Republican voters in the state.

Former Massachusetts Gov. Bill Weld, one of those running against Trump, slammed the state GOP’s decision.

He wrote on Twitter: “Apparently @realDonaldTrump’s bromance with (Russia President Vladimir) Putin extends to emulating the Russian’s approach to elections. The #GAGOP just decided the Georgia Republican Presidential Primary ballot will have only one candidate on it: Donald Trump. What is DJT afraid of?”

Read Newsmax: Trump to be Sole Candidate on Ga. GOP Primary Ballot
Urgent: Do you approve of Pres. Trump’s job performance? Vote Here Now!

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,370]

4 minutes ago, 90DayFinancier said:

This just in, and they already cashed Weld's check!

 

Trump to be Sole Candidate on Ga. GOP Primary Ballot

(Alex Brandon/AP)

By Jeffrey Rodack
Tuesday, 03 Dec 2019 12:39 PM
 

        

Join in the Discussion!

 

---

 

President Donald Trump will be the only candidate on the ballot for the Georgia Republican presidential primary, the state's GOP Chairman David Shafer said on Tuesday.

According to The Hill, Schafer announced that the State Executive Committee had considered five candidates for consideration. It voted to have Trump’s name on the ballot and did not approve any other candidates.

He said Trump was the “only candidate with any significant level of support” among Republican voters in the state.

Former Massachusetts Gov. Bill Weld, one of those running against Trump, slammed the state GOP’s decision.

He wrote on Twitter: “Apparently @realDonaldTrump’s bromance with (Russia President Vladimir) Putin extends to emulating the Russian’s approach to elections. The #GAGOP just decided the Georgia Republican Presidential Primary ballot will have only one candidate on it: Donald Trump. What is DJT afraid of?”

Read Newsmax: Trump to be Sole Candidate on Ga. GOP Primary Ballot
Urgent: Do you approve of Pres. Trump’s job performance? Vote Here Now!

How many Democrats tried to be in the primary ballot and couldn't.  Snooze.  This is non news slanted for the non critical thinker 

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

Oh no, Vladimir Putin is deciding who's on the GA ballot now!  🤡

 

Why didn't Weld run for Democrats? After all, he embarrassed those of us who voted Johnson/Weld in 2016 by telling us we should've voted for Hillary.

 

Obvious answer, it was entirely a stunt, because TDS is insanely easy to monetize.

[90DayFinancier 910]

9 minutes ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

How many Democrats tried to be in the primary ballot and couldn't.  Snooze.  This is non news slanted for the non critical thinker 

How is excluding folks from the ballot different from favoring one candidate over the other?

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

1 minute ago, 90DayFinancier said:

How is excluding folks from the ballot different from favoring one candidate over the other?

Weld is not a serious candidate. That's how. 

[Dashinka 24,504]

32 minutes ago, 90DayFinancier said:

Again, why change your rules to accommodate the current president? Answer: the current president cannot tolerate criticism or dissent. He expects total, lock step, obedience. 

 

The President is also hand picking candidates in GA , LA and AL for lower offices.

This is dangerous for the long term health if the system.

In general, a sitting President has a lot of influence over lower office candidates.  I believe we saw a lot of the same thing in 2012, and even in 2016 (remember Obama said he would have intervened if Hillary had been defeated by Bernie).  I really don't see Trump as demanding total obedience, I know I disagree with him on a lot of issues around global trade, and he has had to face continuous criticism and attack from the Democrats, their media allies, and a great deal of the entrenched bureaucracy since day 1.

[90DayFinancier 910]

6 minutes ago, Burnt Reynolds said:

Weld is not a serious candidate. That's how. 

Who defines serious?

[90DayFinancier 910]

The President weighs in

Trump claims Barr was misquoted in story on Russia probe IG report

The president also said he heard that “there's a lot of devastating things” in the watchdog’s findings

 

President Donald Trump on Tuesday claimed Attorney General William Barr was misquoted in a news report stating that the Justice Department chief disagreed with a key finding in his agency’s watchdog review of the FBI’s investigation into the Trump campaign.

“I think he was quoted incorrectly. I do believe that because I'm hearing the [inspector general’s] report is very powerful,” Trump told reporters at the meeting of NATO leaders in London. “But I'm hearing that by reading lots of different things, not from inside information. It's really from outside information. I think all we have to do is wait.

https://www.politico.com/news/2019/12/03/trump-says-barr-misquoted-story-justice-department-ig-report-074870

Edited December 3, 2019 by 90DayFinancier

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

13 minutes ago, 90DayFinancier said:

Who defines serious?

Anyone who has a memory that spans more than 3 years ago.

[90DayFinancier 910]

17 minutes ago, Burnt Reynolds said:

Anyone who has a memory that spans more than 3 years ago.

Yup, no gaslighting here /s

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

2 hours ago, 90DayFinancier said:

Yup, no gaslighting here /s

So we should take seriously a candidate who, in his last election, gave the finger to his own running mate/party/voters and told people to vote for Hillary?

 

The only gaslighting is by Weld, and how convenient, you defend a guy who you'd not vote for anyways merely because he goes after the big bad orange man. 

 

Gaslighted.

 

Not to worry though, most people see this for what it is, hence why Weld is going nowhere but the MSM+book writing, as is the standard operating procedure for people monetizing TDS. 

Edited December 3, 2019 by Burnt Reynolds

[laylalex 7,284]

Genuine question: if a person meets all the criteria for being on a ballot and has jumped through every hoop to be on the ballot, why should a state exclude that name from the ballot? What is the harm? If it's only being "serious," what are the criteria for defining what "serious" means? I'm sure there are plenty of people who say that Tulsi's not "serious" or Yang's not "serious," but they will be on ballots they qualify to be on unless they drop out.

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

23 minutes ago, laylalex said:

Genuine question: if a person meets all the criteria for being on a ballot and has jumped through every hoop to be on the ballot, why should a state exclude that name from the ballot? What is the harm? If it's only being "serious," what are the criteria for defining what "serious" means? I'm sure there are plenty of people who say that Tulsi's not "serious" or Yang's not "serious," but they will be on ballots they qualify to be on unless they drop out.

He hasn't met all the criteria to be on the GA GOP primary ballot, which is why neither he nor Walsh made it. 

 

It's not surprising, because he's not a serious candidate.