House Intel Committee possesses video, audio recordings from Giuliani associate

[90DayFinancier 910]

WATCH & READ

Rudy Giuliani may be facing a federal indictment

 

• By
• KATHERINE FAULDERS
• , JOHN SANTUCCI
• andALLISON PECORIN

Nov 24, 2019, 5:31 PM 

WATCH Rudy Giuliani may be facing a federal indictment

The House Intelligence Committee is in possession of audio and video recordings and photographs provided to the committee by Lev Parnas, an associate of President Donald Trump’s personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani, who reportedly played a key role in assisting him in his efforts to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden and Ukraine, multiple sources familiar with the matter tell ABC News.

The material submitted to the committee includes audio, video and photos that include Giuliani and Trump. It was unclear what the content depicts and the committees only began accessing the material last week.

(MORE: Giuliani's associate Lev Parnas ready to comply with congressional impeachment inquiry)

"We have subpoenaed Mr. Parnas and Mr. [Igor] Fruman for their records. We would like them to fully comply with those subpoenas," House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff told CNN Sunday, with a committee spokesperson adding they would not elaborate beyond the chairman's comments.

An attorney for Parnas, Joseph A. Bondy, also declined to comment, directing ABC News to a statement released earlier in the day Sunday reading in part, "Mr. Parnas has vociferously and publicly asserted his wish to comply with his previously issued subpoena and to provide the House Intelligence Committee with truthful and important information that is in furtherance of justice, not to obstruct it."

The statement goes on to say, "His evidence and potential testimony is non-partisan, and not intended to be part of a battle between the left and the right, but rather an aid in the determination by our government of what is in the best interests of our nation."

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/house-intelligence-committee-possession-video-audio-recordings-giuliani/story?id=67276448

 

 

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,370]

How did read that and conclude indicted 

[laylalex 7,284]

"May be facing a federal indictment" is what it says. And at the bottom of the article, this:

 

Quote

Giuliani’s relationship with Parnas and Fruman is the subject of a criminal investigation in the Southern District of New York, that case will have its next court date early next month.

So I guess the indictment would come out of that criminal investigation, if there is an indictment.

[90DayFinancier 910]

1 hour ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

How did read that and conclude indicted 

Are we missing a few articles here or am I missing something?

[90DayFinancier 910]

1 hour ago, laylalex said:

"May be facing a federal indictment" is what it says. And at the bottom of the article, this:

 

So I guess the indictment would come out of that criminal investigation, if there is an indictment.

Yes southern district of New York, the old office of  Guliani. Chuck Rhoades stuff baby!

Edited November 25, 2019 by 90DayFinancier

[laylalex 7,284]

10 minutes ago, 90DayFinancier said:

Are we missing a few articles here or am I missing something?

He's just very efficient. 

[90DayFinancier 910]

1 minute ago, laylalex said:

He's just very efficient. 

What Nature Boy does, it cannot be taught!

[laylalex 7,284]

2 minutes ago, 90DayFinancier said:

What Nature Boy does, it cannot be taught!

I've had any number of men and boys in my life at every age tell me how much better men were at getting points across. I think this is kind of like one of those word puzzles you see on Facebook -- if you can figure out what this pile of letters means, you have a genius IQ! 

 

Sorry Nature Boy. I feel bad about jokes at your expense when you've been so helpful with car stuff tonight.  

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,370]

16 minutes ago, laylalex said:

I've had any number of men and boys in my life at every age tell me how much better men were at getting points across. I think this is kind of like one of those word puzzles you see on Facebook -- if you can figure out what this pile of letters means, you have a genius IQ! 

 

Sorry Nature Boy. I feel bad about jokes at your expense when you've been so helpful with car stuff tonight.  

I enjoy the sarcasm and jokes. I am very comfortable in my own skin. I know I operate in the genius range, just dont do grammar well. Funny actually 

[Dashinka 24,504]

8 hours ago, laylalex said:

"May be facing a federal indictment" is what it says. And at the bottom of the article, this:

 

So I guess the indictment would come out of that criminal investigation, if there is an indictment.

So we can say the same thing about the officials from the former administration that may be facing indictments from the Durham investigation/Grand Jury?  I can certainly think of a few that "may be facing indictment", I wonder why ABC is not covering that news?

 

 

[Ban Hammer 13,342]

9 hours ago, laylalex said:

I've had any number of men and boys in my life at every age tell me how much better men were at getting points across. I think this is kind of like one of those word puzzles you see on Facebook -- if you can figure out what this pile of letters means, you have a genius IQ! 

 

Sorry Nature Boy. I feel bad about jokes at your expense when you've been so helpful with car stuff tonight.  

  there is a special class mods have to take to understand nb's posts for moderation purposes.

[90DayFinancier 910]

1 hour ago, Ban Hammer said:

  there is a special class mods have to take to understand nb's posts for moderation purposes.

I promise you, his posts are 3d chess.

3 hours ago, Bill & Katya said:

So we can say the same thing about the officials from the former administration that may be facing indictments from the Durham investigation/Grand Jury?  I can certainly think of a few that "may be facing indictment", I wonder why ABC is not covering that news?

 

 

They have tapes?

[Dashinka 24,504]

10 minutes ago, 90DayFinancier said:

I promise you, his posts are 3d chess.

They have tapes?

Who knows what Durham has.

[laylalex 7,284]

4 hours ago, Bill & Katya said:

So we can say the same thing about the officials from the former administration that may be facing indictments from the Durham investigation/Grand Jury?  I can certainly think of a few that "may be facing indictment", I wonder why ABC is not covering that news?

 

 

Question: have they (and I don't know who is included in "they") been named officially as being under investigation? I genuinely don't know, so I'm asking. Also, I may be wrong but I think the Durham investigation would have to bring its final report to the Justice Department to decide whether to indict or not. That sounds like an extra step over what SDNY is doing. I may be totally off base on that last point but I think these are at very different stages. 

[Dashinka 24,504]

13 minutes ago, laylalex said:

Question: have they (and I don't know who is included in "they") been named officially as being under investigation? I genuinely don't know, so I'm asking. Also, I may be wrong but I think the Durham investigation would have to bring its final report to the Justice Department to decide whether to indict or not. That sounds like an extra step over what SDNY is doing. I may be totally off base on that last point but I think these are at very different stages. 

There has not been much news coming out of the Durham investigation.  Certainly some speculation, but I think he has similar powers to SDNY.