Jump to content
Ban Hammer

'Meth: We're On It': South Dakota's anti-drug campaign draws laughs from social media

 Share

9 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline

sd_1574116251723_16841081_ver1.0_640_360
South Dakota's governor announced a new anti-meth campaign Monday, but the wording of the slogan designed to stop the rise of the drug's use has residents confused -- and social media is having a field day. 

 

Gov. Kristi Noem's campaign included television advertising, billboards, posters and a  website. 

 

The slogan? "Meth. We're On It," the Argus Leader of Sioux Falls reported.

 

"I do not think it means what they think it means," one person tweeted.

 

That was the gentlest rebuke. Many on social media wondered if the intended phrase was something like, "Meth. We're On Top Of It."

 

The campaign's motto features the phrase, "Meth. We're on it," over an outline of South Dakota, with people of different ages, genders and races repeating the phrase, the Argus Leader reported.

 

more at https://www.fox23.com/news/trending-now/-i-m-on-meth-south-dakota-s-anti-drug-campaign-draws-laughs-from-social-media/1009953855?fbclid=IwAR1eWGZn4JDrAcculobR6BeQcCaxPplaboQpJV84foGzZI42DLIPAKCC23k

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's good for trying to destigmatize drugs. The less stigmatized it is, the more open people are, the more they can get an education about it, the more they can actively seek help, rather than rot in shame privately while being a public burden anyways.

 

But, the people that were sourced to concoct this marketing campaign were likely some new grads or urban edgelord agency who doesn't know much about marketing in practice, least of all states like South Dakota, and dealing with a matter like this which requires a more measured approach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Country: Vietnam
Timeline
1 hour ago, Ban Hammer said:

sd_1574116251723_16841081_ver1.0_640_360
South Dakota's governor announced a new anti-meth campaign Monday, but the wording of the slogan designed to stop the rise of the drug's use has residents confused -- and social media is having a field day. 

 

Gov. Kristi Noem's campaign included television advertising, billboards, posters and a  website. 

 

The slogan? "Meth. We're On It," the Argus Leader of Sioux Falls reported.

 

"I do not think it means what they think it means," one person tweeted.

 

That was the gentlest rebuke. Many on social media wondered if the intended phrase was something like, "Meth. We're On Top Of It."

 

The campaign's motto features the phrase, "Meth. We're on it," over an outline of South Dakota, with people of different ages, genders and races repeating the phrase, the Argus Leader reported.

 

more at https://www.fox23.com/news/trending-now/-i-m-on-meth-south-dakota-s-anti-drug-campaign-draws-laughs-from-social-media/1009953855?fbclid=IwAR1eWGZn4JDrAcculobR6BeQcCaxPplaboQpJV84foGzZI42DLIPAKCC23k

I have been up there many times and can vouch that it does not surprise me how clueless they are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I came of age in the late 70s early 80s. I can honestly say I have never seen Meth

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
2 hours ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

I came of age in the late 70s early 80s. I can honestly say I have never seen Meth

that's meth'ed up.

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Ban Hammer said:

that's meth'ed up.

Did tbone hack your account?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really interesting long piece on how the campaign came about. https://www.keloland.com/keloland-com-original/behind-the-scenes-of-the-meth-were-on-it-campaign-and-how-it-got-approved/

 

And no, it's not from a bunch of urban edgelords. Personally, I like to look into the background of things before judging them but that's just me. :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
10 hours ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

Did tbone hack your account?

No, but Cat T-B. just hacked a gigantic hairball.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...