Jump to content

18 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: O-2 Visa Country: Sweden
Timeline
Posted

 

The outcome of this race could show how much influence Trump still does — or doesn’t — have.

By Li Zhouli@vox.com  Nov 14, 2019, 7:50am EST

 

Republicans’ recent loss in the Kentucky governor’s race didn’t reflect well on the president, but the real proving ground of President Donald Trump’s influence might just be the upcoming race in Louisiana this weekend.

The southern state is the third and final one to vote on its governor this November, and it’s the latest one where the Republican candidate has tied himself closely to the president. Republican challenger Eddie Rispone is taking on incumbent Gov. John Bel Edwards, the rare Democratic state executive in the Deep South, and he’s leaning heavily on Trump to do so.

Edwards first won the governor’s seat by staging a major upset in 2015, when he defeated former US Sen. David Vitter by a 55 to 44 percent margin. At the time, his surprising win was the result of a number of factors: Bobby Jindal, the prior Republican governor, was immensely unpopular, Vitter ran a highly negative campaign that alienated Republicans, and Edwards steadily made the case for himself while effectively hammering his opponent on a prostitution scandal.

This time around, the circumstances are slightly different. While Edwards is credited with some major achievements during his first term, including Medicaid expansion and a budget surplus, he’s now going up against both the dominance of Republicans in the state and voters’ commitment to Trump. In the month leading up to the election, Trump — who won Louisiana by 20 points — has paid multiple visits. Edwards will need to rally Democrats, including a strong base of African American voters, along with a contingent of moderate Republicans, in order to hold onto his seat.

 

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/11/14/20955815/louisiana-governor-race-john-bel-edwards-eddie-rispone-donald-trump

Posted

I don't align with John Bel Edwards on a number of issues, and I think his signing into law a ban on abortions after six weeks is not good for the people of Louisiana, even if you look at it just as a colossal waste of cash since it will invariably be struck down as unconstitutional. But I am not a single issue voter (not that I can vote in LA), and I am willing to listen to other voices even if they don't match my own perfectly. The whole purity test thing is useless, in my opinion. 

 

Of course, if a person's moral compass points to "douche" I am willing to put them on the garbage heap even if their policy positions are "perfect."

Posted (edited)
44 minutes ago, laylalex said:

I don't align with John Bel Edwards on a number of issues, and I think his signing into law a ban on abortions after six weeks is not good for the people of Louisiana, even if you look at it just as a colossal waste of cash since it will invariably be struck down as unconstitutional. But I am not a single issue voter (not that I can vote in LA), and I am willing to listen to other voices even if they don't match my own perfectly. The whole purity test thing is useless, in my opinion. 

 

Of course, if a person's moral compass points to "douche" I am willing to put them on the garbage heap even if their policy positions are "perfect."

No sense in using "invariably", especially if any of Ginsburg/Sotomayor/Breyer/Kagan's seats open up. Even though I'm pro-choice, there's no reason why Roe v. Wade can't be disregarded/overturned.

Edited by Burnt Reynolds
Posted

This doesn't surprise me one bit after I watched the piece that The Hill's Rising show did on him last week. The governor is a pretty big Blue Dog Democrat so it's no wonder he won re-election.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

The only story here is that no anti-Trump candidate won the La. Governor's race.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Posted
4 minutes ago, 90DayFinancier said:

The candidate that Trump flew down for did though.

I'm trying to figure out the double negative here (blame the Tom Collins I'm drinking) but is John Bel Edwards not anti-Trump?

Filed: O-2 Visa Country: Sweden
Timeline
Posted
3 minutes ago, laylalex said:

I'm trying to figure out the double negative here (blame the Tom Collins I'm drinking) but is John Bel Edwards not anti-Trump?

Well not not anti Trump. But Trump did not call him a name on Twitter so I  not sure what he is.

Posted (edited)
56 minutes ago, laylalex said:

I'm trying to figure out the double negative here (blame the Tom Collins I'm drinking) but is John Bel Edwards not anti-Trump?

You either drinking or getting dressed or extracting money from mens pockets 

Edited by Nature Boy 2.0
Posted
1 minute ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

You either drinking or getting dressed or extracting money from mens pockets 

I'm on mini-vacation now (apartments all viewed, nothing to do until tomorrow's flight home). I can have a drink; who are you, my dad? :P

 

And I am fully dressed and in the hotel bar and paying for these drinks with my own money. 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...