Jump to content
afrocraft

USCIS proposes increasing application fees by 21% or more

 Share

79 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Citizen (pnd) Country: Lebanon
Timeline

I think USCIS should increase the fees just a little bit for the standard processing so they can make some profit and not lose money, but they should also start premium processing for most of the petitions.

N400 for example, to reach the  Naturalization stage, that means the petitioner has lived in the US for a while and they should know everything about this person, or at least know about more than people who are applying for AOS. Therefore, processing time should be shorter. They should offer premium processing (2-4 months guaranteed) for $2,500 or $3000. This way they can make big profit from the people who can afford to pay big. Just like airlines, all passengers will get to board the airplane, but not everyone can afford first class tickets.

The immigration process caused me PTSD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Deagle said:

Higher fees should come with better service and faster processing times. 

I agree.  That’s their goal as well.  

 

The fee review:  Allows for an assessment of USCIS policy changes, staffing levels, costs, revenue, etc. USCIS evaluates operational requirements and makes informed decisions concerning program scaling, resource planning, and staffing allocations;

 

4 minutes ago, Deagle said:

I think USCIS should increase the fees just a little bit for the standard processing so they can make some profit and not lose money, but they should also start premium processing for most of the petitions.

N400 for example, to reach the  Naturalization stage, that means the petitioner has lived in the US for a while and they should know everything about this person, or at least know about more than people who are applying for AOS. Therefore, processing time should be shorter. They should offer premium processing (2-4 months guaranteed) for $2,500 or $3000. This way they can make big profit from the people who can afford to pay big. Just like airlines, all passengers will get to board the airplane, but not everyone can afford first class tickets.

That would be ideal!  But it seems that 

Congress established the premium processing service for “employment-based petitions and applications.”

 

Also, 

Commenters regularly request that DHS extend premium processing to other immigration benefit requests.  Nevertheless, it would be difficult to estimate the staff, resources, and costs necessary to ensure the processing of additional benefit types within a certain time frame, especially when those cases may require other types of background checks, interviews, and additional steps that USCIS does not generally control. Expanding the premium processing program would require USCIS to estimate the costs of a service that does not currently exist with sufficient confidence that it can deliver the service promised and not impair service in other product lines. DHS would require the devotion of considerable resources to study a potential new premium processing program. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (pnd) Country: Lebanon
Timeline
24 minutes ago, NYCQueens2017 said:

 

 Nevertheless, it would be difficult to estimate the staff, resources, and costs necessary to ensure the processing of additional benefit types within a certain time frame, especially when those cases may require other types of background checks, interviews, and additional steps that USCIS does not generally control. 

 

I find this hard to believe. I think that every petition required background check. I mean, are they saying that "employment-based petitions" doesn't require background checks? I mean N400 should really be the fastest petition since the applicant has been in the country for either 3 or 5 years. They have all the info they need plus a trial period lol.

The immigration process caused me PTSD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Morocco
Timeline
1 hour ago, Deagle said:

Higher fees should come with better service and faster processing times. 

In the private sector maybe, but in GOV, that's called wishful thinking!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Deagle said:

I think USCIS should increase the fees just a little bit for the standard processing so they can make some profit and not lose money, but they should also start premium processing for most of the petitions.

N400 for example, to reach the  Naturalization stage, that means the petitioner has lived in the US for a while and they should know everything about this person, or at least know about more than people who are applying for AOS. Therefore, processing time should be shorter. They should offer premium processing (2-4 months guaranteed) for $2,500 or $3000. This way they can make big profit from the people who can afford to pay big. Just like airlines, all passengers will get to board the airplane, but not everyone can afford first class tickets.

The reason why premium processing has a value/meaning is because it only applies to categories that are strictly limited in number. There are not an unlimited number of petitions available for premium processing. They can anticipate the work load and have the right number of people for that task beforehand.

Opening that up for family-based petitions, ROC, naturalization, etc. would likely just result in paying a larger fee to effectively wait in the same line with the vast majority of applicants.

Edited by geowrian

Timelines:

ROC:

Spoiler

7/27/20: Sent forms to Dallas lockbox, 7/30/20: Received by USCIS, 8/10 NOA1 electronic notification received, 8/1/ NOA1 hard copy received

AOS:

Spoiler

AOS (I-485 + I-131 + I-765):

9/25/17: sent forms to Chicago, 9/27/17: received by USCIS, 10/4/17: NOA1 electronic notification received, 10/10/17: NOA1 hard copy received. Social Security card being issued in married name (3rd attempt!)

10/14/17: Biometrics appointment notice received, 10/25/17: Biometrics

1/2/18: EAD + AP approved (no website update), 1/5/18: EAD + AP mailed, 1/8/18: EAD + AP approval notice hardcopies received, 1/10/18: EAD + AP received

9/5/18: Interview scheduled notice, 10/17/18: Interview

10/24/18: Green card produced notice, 10/25/18: Formal approval, 10/31/18: Green card received

K-1:

Spoiler

I-129F

12/1/16: sent, 12/14/16: NOA1 hard copy received, 3/10/17: RFE (IMB verification), 3/22/17: RFE response received

3/24/17: Approved! , 3/30/17: NOA2 hard copy received

 

NVC

4/6/2017: Received, 4/12/2017: Sent to Riyadh embassy, 4/16/2017: Case received at Riyadh embassy, 4/21/2017: Request case transfer to Manila, approved 4/24/2017

 

K-1

5/1/2017: Case received by Manila (1 week embassy transfer??? Lucky~)

7/13/2017: Interview: APPROVED!!!

7/19/2017: Visa in hand

8/15/2017: POE

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (pnd) Country: Lebanon
Timeline
3 minutes ago, geowrian said:

The reason why premium processing has a value/meaning is because it only applies to categories that are strictly limited in number. There are not an unlimited number of petitions available for premium processing. They can anticipate the work load and have the right number of people for that task beforehand.

Opening that up for family-based petitions, ROC, naturalization, etc. would likely just result in paying a larger fee to effectively wait in the same line with the vast majority of applicants.

Higher fees = more money = more employees.

The immigration process caused me PTSD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, geowrian said:

The reason why premium processing has a value/meaning is because it only applies to categories that are strictly limited in number. There are not an unlimited number of petitions available for premium processing. They can anticipate the work load and have the right number of people for that task beforehand.

Opening that up for family-based petitions, ROC, naturalization, etc. would likely just result in paying a larger fee to effectively wait in the same line with the vast majority of applicants.

My thoughts exactly. If that happens, essentially a large enough number of people will be able to pay for PP that it will make it "not premium" anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, geowrian said:

The main issue, IMHO, is lack of planning in most cases. They are always slow to respond to changes in workloads, and have no planning for anything unexpected. That's why have such large backlogs in the first place, which is the real issue...not so much their ability to handle the current processing load.

I tend to agree with your view.  They are constantly behind the curve.  If you check the fees that were in place back in the 90’s ($150-$250 approx.) for petitions such as AOS, ROC, EAD, N-400 etc., compared to the fees that are in place today/will be in place in a few months, the increase is insane.  However, even the fact that more employees were hired by USCIS, the backlog increased tremendously, as petitions back then were adjudicated in just a couple months time.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Deagle said:

Higher fees should come with better service and faster processing times. 

We are not laughing at you. We are laughing from keeping from crying....

Finally done...

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Lemonslice said:

Hopefully, k1 will become less attractive. Too many people are already ignoring the AOS cost and unable to file in a timely manner. 

I would think this would reduce the number of economically challenged filers...

Finally done...

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To put it in context, take a look at the CRS Report for Congress (dated 6/12/2007).

 

Page CRS-19 states historical fees (1994-2004) for selected immigration benefits, while pages CRS-38 to CRS-39 show the processing times and completions rates as of 2007.  

 

Comparing this piece of information to today’s processing times and tomorrow’s proposed fees, indicates that the fee level (or more staff) is inversely correlated to the processing times.  Someone could say that, this pattern shows that other issues should be concurrently addressed to resolve the backlog problem.

 

https://trac.syr.edu/immigration/library/P1984.pdf

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
2 hours ago, Lemonslice said:

Hopefully, k1 will become less attractive. Too many people are already ignoring the AOS cost and unable to file in a timely manner. 

There are already far more IR-1/CR-1s filed than K-1s, and that's not even figuring in AOS from non-K visas.

K-1                             AOS                            
NOA1 Notice Date: 2018-05-31    NOA1 Notice Date: 2019-04-11   
NOA2 Date: 2018-11-16           Biometrics Date: 2019-05-10    
Arrived at NVC:  2018-12-03     EAD/AP In Hand: 2019-09-16     
Arrived in Moscow: 2018-12-28   GC Interview Date: 2019-09-25      
Interview date: 2019-02-14      GC In Hand: 2019-10-02
Visa issued: 2019-02-28
POE: 2019-03-11
Wedding: 2019-03-14

ROC                             Naturalization
NOA1 Notice Date: 2021-07-16    Applied Online: 2022-07-09 (biometrics waived)
Approval Date: 2022-04-06       Interview was Scheduled: 2023-01-06
10-year GC In Hand: 2022-04-14  Interview date: 2023-02-13 (passed)
                            	Oath: 2023-02-13

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...