Coup has started,' whistleblower's attorney said in 2017 posts calling for impeachment

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,378]

10 minutes ago, laylalex said:

Sorry, I'm getting dressed for work. I'm not about to post my opinions on facts and facts about opinions when I'm half-naked, thanks.

classic. I have no facts, but I might have boobage. 

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,378]

Whistleblower attorney defends 'coup' tweet, as Trump calls for impeachment probe shutdown

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/whistleblower-attorney-coup-trump

[90DayFinancier 910]

1 hour ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

classic. I have no facts, but I might have boobage. 

Maybe in your dreams

[Neonred 3,632]

6 minutes ago, 90DayFinancier said:

Maybe in your dreams

Man boobs

[90DayFinancier 910]

1 minute ago, Neonred said:

Man boobs

Please, lunch is very soon.

16 minutes ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

Whistleblower attorney defends 'coup' tweet, as Trump calls for impeachment probe shutdown

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/whistleblower-attorney-coup-trump

[Boris Farage 353]

Liberals when Fox News supports the President: Fox News sucks!

Liberals when Fox News criticizes the President: *crickets*

 

Edited November 7, 2019 by Boris Farage

[Dashinka 24,740]

8 minutes ago, 90DayFinancier said:

Please, lunch is very soon.

So this lawyer did not write those tweets?

[90DayFinancier 910]

10 minutes ago, Boris Farage said:

Liberals when Fox News supports the President: Fox News sucks!

Liberals when Fox News criticizes the President: *crickets*

 

Please post some Fox news critical of the President.

[90DayFinancier 910]

10 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

So this lawyer did not write those tweets?

Who's lawyer? The whistle blower? How would someone know his/ her name, exposing them is a federal offense.

[Dashinka 24,740]

A few facts.

 

Testimony: How Trump helped Ukraine
 

by Byron York

 | November 07, 2019 01:52 AM

 

 

One notable and little-reported conclusion emerging from the House Democratic impeachment proceedings is a consensus among some foreign policy professionals that President Trump's Ukraine policy has been an improvement over President Barack Obama's. 

Ukraine was an occasionally hot issue in the 2016 campaign for all the wrong reasons. At the Republican convention, a false headline in the Washington Post, "Trump campaign guts GOP's anti-Russia stance on Ukraine," gave birth to a false narrative that candidate Trump, desperate to appease Vladimir Putin, would undermine U.S. support for Ukraine in the face of Russian aggression.

Then Trump became president, and his administration enacted a new policy that not only continued a broad range of assistance to Ukraine but also expanded that aid to include the provision of Javelin anti-tank missiles — the so-called "lethal aid" that the Obama administration had declined to provide. 

The Trump aid program has significantly helped Ukraine defend itself against Russia, according to three career foreign policy officials whose impeachment investigation testimony has been released in recent days: William Taylor, the highest-ranking American diplomat in Ukraine; Kurt Volker, the former U.S. special envoy for Ukraine; and Marie Yovanovitch, the former ambassador to Ukraine who was recalled by Trump in May.

Start with Taylor. Questioned by Republican lawyer Steve Castor, Taylor called Trump administration policy a "substantial improvement" over what came before. 

"Once you joined the administration in Kiev, were you happy with the package of aid?" asked Castor.

"I was happy that we were providing aid," Taylor said. "It could always be more. But I was glad if it was coming. I would've been very unhappy if it didn't come."

"But the Trump administration had a package of aid to the Ukraine?"

"Yes."

"Including lethal defensive weapons?"

"Yes."

"Financial assistance?"

"I was very happy about that."

"And was that an improvement [over] years prior?"

"It was."

"Was it a substantial improvement?"

"It was a substantial improvement, in that this administration provided Javelin anti-tank weapons," Taylor explained. The shoulder-fired missiles, he said, "successfully deter Russians from trying to grab more territory."

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columnists/testimony-how-trump-helped-ukraine

[Dashinka 24,740]

2 minutes ago, 90DayFinancier said:

Who's lawyer? The whistle blower? How would someone know his/ her name, exposing them is a federal offense.

I believe the lawyer in question here has been very plain he represents the whistleblower.  I don’t believe he actually revealed the name of the whistleblower.

[laylalex 7,300]

1 hour ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

classic. I have no facts, but I might have boobage. 

That's very presumptuous of you to know which part of me was unclothed at the time. 

[90DayFinancier 910]

19 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

I believe the lawyer in question here has been very plain he represents the whistleblower.  I don’t believe he actually revealed the name of the whistleblower.

No, that is the pervue of the President's son.

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,378]

50 minutes ago, 90DayFinancier said:

Maybe in your dreams

I dont think this dream was involving you dudette 

17 minutes ago, laylalex said:

That's very presumptuous of you to know which part of me was unclothed at the time. 

well just tell us, then I will not have presumptions 

[Dashinka 24,740]

3 minutes ago, 90DayFinancier said:

No, that is the pervue of the President's son.

Not sure what you are talking about. Are you saying that Mark Zaid does not represent the whistleblower?  Isn’t he one of the lawyers talking to Schiff and the media on behalf of this person?