Jump to content

89 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Pakistan
Timeline
Posted
1 minute ago, Paul & Mary said:

It would have applied to the I-485 AOS process in the US.   Not to I-864 in consular processing.

 

Just now, missileman said:

The Oct 15th rule never affected those applying at consulates for immigrant visas..it applied only to those applying for AOS inside the US..........Consulates have, for many years, considered the public charge issue when evaluating applicants' situations.   I see no reason to think that will change.

Got it, thanks!

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Taiwan
Timeline
Posted
Just now, aceegreene said:

 

Got it, thanks!

To be more specific, the Oct 15th rule included a table which specifically listed who would be affected by the public charge rule........it specifically indicated Adjustment of Status.....

"The US immigration process requires a great deal of knowledge, planning, time, patience, and a significant amount of money.  It is quite a journey!"

- Some old child of the 50's & 60's on his laptop 

 

Senior Master Sergeant, US Air Force- Retired (after 20+ years)- Missile Systems Maintenance & Titan 2 ICBM Launch Crew Duty (200+ Alert tours)

Registered Nurse- Retired- I practiced in the areas of Labor & Delivery, Home Health, Adolescent Psych, & Adult Psych.

IT Professional- Retired- Web Site Design, Hardware Maintenance, Compound Pharmacy Software Trainer, On-site go live support, Database Manager, App Designer.

______________________________________

In summary, it took 13 months for approval of the CR-1.  It took 44 months for approval of the I-751.  It took 4 months for approval of the N-400.   It took 172 days from N-400 application to Oath Ceremony.   It took 6 weeks for Passport, then 7 additional weeks for return of wife's Naturalization Certificate.. 
 

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Pakistan
Timeline
Posted
9 minutes ago, missileman said:

To be more specific, the Oct 15th rule included a table which specifically listed who would be affected by the public charge rule........it specifically indicated Adjustment of Status.....

Just went through those tables and you are right, it only mentions adjustment of status. So I guess the status quo prevails for applicants outside the USA.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Taiwan
Timeline
Posted
Just now, aceegreene said:

Just went through those tables and you are right, it only mentions adjustment of status. So I guess the status quo prevails for applicants outside the USA.

That's my understanding for the public charge issue.........except that the new healthcare rule beginning Nov 4th hasn't been challenged in court yet, to my knowledge.

"The US immigration process requires a great deal of knowledge, planning, time, patience, and a significant amount of money.  It is quite a journey!"

- Some old child of the 50's & 60's on his laptop 

 

Senior Master Sergeant, US Air Force- Retired (after 20+ years)- Missile Systems Maintenance & Titan 2 ICBM Launch Crew Duty (200+ Alert tours)

Registered Nurse- Retired- I practiced in the areas of Labor & Delivery, Home Health, Adolescent Psych, & Adult Psych.

IT Professional- Retired- Web Site Design, Hardware Maintenance, Compound Pharmacy Software Trainer, On-site go live support, Database Manager, App Designer.

______________________________________

In summary, it took 13 months for approval of the CR-1.  It took 44 months for approval of the I-751.  It took 4 months for approval of the N-400.   It took 172 days from N-400 application to Oath Ceremony.   It took 6 weeks for Passport, then 7 additional weeks for return of wife's Naturalization Certificate.. 
 

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Pakistan
Timeline
Posted
2 minutes ago, missileman said:

That's my understanding for the public charge issue.........except that the new healthcare rule beginning Nov 4th hasn't been challenged in court yet, to my knowledge.

Not that I know of either. Is the Nov 4th rule effective only for applications submitted on or after that date? Or does it become effective for everyone who is in the immigrant visa process once the date crosses?

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Taiwan
Timeline
Posted
1 minute ago, aceegreene said:

Not that I know of either. Is the Nov 4th rule effective only for applications submitted on or after that date? Or does it become effective for everyone who is in the immigrant visa process once the date crosses?

Good question.......I'm not sure.

"The US immigration process requires a great deal of knowledge, planning, time, patience, and a significant amount of money.  It is quite a journey!"

- Some old child of the 50's & 60's on his laptop 

 

Senior Master Sergeant, US Air Force- Retired (after 20+ years)- Missile Systems Maintenance & Titan 2 ICBM Launch Crew Duty (200+ Alert tours)

Registered Nurse- Retired- I practiced in the areas of Labor & Delivery, Home Health, Adolescent Psych, & Adult Psych.

IT Professional- Retired- Web Site Design, Hardware Maintenance, Compound Pharmacy Software Trainer, On-site go live support, Database Manager, App Designer.

______________________________________

In summary, it took 13 months for approval of the CR-1.  It took 44 months for approval of the I-751.  It took 4 months for approval of the N-400.   It took 172 days from N-400 application to Oath Ceremony.   It took 6 weeks for Passport, then 7 additional weeks for return of wife's Naturalization Certificate.. 
 

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Pakistan
Timeline
Posted
7 minutes ago, missileman said:

Good question.......I'm not sure.

Direct quote from the proclamation below, which I believe means that whoever doesn't have an immigrant visa in hand by that date will be affected by the rule.

 

Sec. 2.  Scope of Suspension and Limitation on Entry.  (a)  Section 1 of this proclamation shall apply only to aliens seeking to enter the United States pursuant to an immigrant visa.

(b)  Section 1 of this proclamation shall not apply to:

(i)     any alien holding a valid immigrant visa issued before the effective date of this proclamation;

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted

I know this new rule was blocked in court, but it's only a matter of time before it becomes fully enforceable, IMO.

 

Right now the rule for people adjusting from K1 visas is that their sponsor has to earn 125% or greater of the Federal HHS Poverty Guidelines for their family size.

 

How does this change under the new law? It's not clear to me.

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted
15 minutes ago, Bjh said:

I know this new rule was blocked in court, but it's only a matter of time before it becomes fully enforceable, IMO.

 

Right now the rule for people adjusting from K1 visas is that their sponsor has to earn 125% or greater of the Federal HHS Poverty Guidelines for their family size.

 

How does this change under the new law? It's not clear to me.

Look for the very large thread on this topic already,  its been being discussed for weeks 

YMMV

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Germany
Timeline
Posted
15 minutes ago, Bjh said:

I know this new rule was blocked in court, but it's only a matter of time before it becomes fully enforceable, IMO.

 

Right now the rule for people adjusting from K1 visas is that their sponsor has to earn 125% or greater of the Federal HHS Poverty Guidelines for their family size.

 

How does this change under the new law? It's not clear to me.

No change at all.

What they added is that making 250% is a heavily positive factor but the rule is still a minimum of 125% 

Filed: Lift. Cond. (apr) Country: China
Timeline
Posted
20 hours ago, ale07 said:

It might get blocked as others have mentioned, but just so you know my husband was able to add me to his insurance without a SSN. 

I was able to do the same with my wife. A lot likely depends on the policies and attitudes of the health insurance carrier.

Completed: K1/K2 (271 days) - AOS/EAD/AP (134 days) - ROC (279 days)

"Si vis amari, ama" - Seneca

 

 

 

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Taiwan
Timeline
Posted
53 minutes ago, aceegreene said:

Direct quote from the proclamation below, which I believe means that whoever doesn't have an immigrant visa in hand by that date will be affected by the rule.

 

Sec. 2.  Scope of Suspension and Limitation on Entry.  (a)  Section 1 of this proclamation shall apply only to aliens seeking to enter the United States pursuant to an immigrant visa.

(b)  Section 1 of this proclamation shall not apply to:

(i)     any alien holding a valid immigrant visa issued before the effective date of this proclamation;

That sounds to be the case....

"The US immigration process requires a great deal of knowledge, planning, time, patience, and a significant amount of money.  It is quite a journey!"

- Some old child of the 50's & 60's on his laptop 

 

Senior Master Sergeant, US Air Force- Retired (after 20+ years)- Missile Systems Maintenance & Titan 2 ICBM Launch Crew Duty (200+ Alert tours)

Registered Nurse- Retired- I practiced in the areas of Labor & Delivery, Home Health, Adolescent Psych, & Adult Psych.

IT Professional- Retired- Web Site Design, Hardware Maintenance, Compound Pharmacy Software Trainer, On-site go live support, Database Manager, App Designer.

______________________________________

In summary, it took 13 months for approval of the CR-1.  It took 44 months for approval of the I-751.  It took 4 months for approval of the N-400.   It took 172 days from N-400 application to Oath Ceremony.   It took 6 weeks for Passport, then 7 additional weeks for return of wife's Naturalization Certificate.. 
 

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Jamaica
Timeline
Posted
13 minutes ago, Fogi said:

Check with your provider. Once you're married most will add the spouse without a SSN. Get your ducks in a row before the fiance gets here. Proof that you can add her. 

She's actually my wife and my company said i can't sign up for insurance until the end of the month and her interview (in her country ) is 7th of November 

Posted
1 hour ago, aceegreene said:

Just went through those tables and you are right, it only mentions adjustment of status. So I guess the status quo prevails for applicants outside the USA.

 

2 hours ago, missileman said:

To be more specific, the Oct 15th rule included a table which specifically listed who would be affected by the public charge rule........it specifically indicated Adjustment of Status.....

 

2 hours ago, missileman said:

The Oct 15th rule never affected those applying at consulates for immigrant visas..it applied only to those applying for AOS inside the US..........Consulates have, for many years, considered the public charge issue when evaluating applicants' situations.   I see no reason to think that will change.

Just to add and clarify. As has been mentioned above the 14 August 2019 rule that was going to be implemented on October 15 was only specific to those going through Adjustment of Status. These rules are implemented through DHS and USCIS. These agencies were litigated against and temporary injunction was placed on their rule. For consular visa processing it is responsibility of Department of State to set rules and guidelines for those applying from outside of the country and so the above mentioned rule would not affect people through this process BUT and here is the big BUT, the department of state (DOS) had already modified public charge at beginning of the year and on Friday (October 11) put out an interim rule specifying that they were changing their guidelines to closer adhere to the DHS and USCIS new rules on public charge that were going to take effect on October 15. So even though the original rules set by DHS and USCIS have an injunction on them, this injunction will not effect guidance updates and rule updates by DOS. You can read more about this DOS plan here:

 

https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/traveladvisories/ea/Information-on-Public-Charge.html

 

So consular processing is not status quo for outside the USA and is changing. In fact this interim guidance is going into effect on October 15 as well. To me this is crazy because the guidance/rules were set for AOS applicants and many areas don't make sense for visa applicants and the form changes and new forms were also specific to AOS and no longer are published at all, so how they intend to collect this new information for visa applicants is anyone's guess at this point. It seems like complete chaos to me.

 

So in summary DOS consular visa processing is changing it's guidelines to closer reflect the August 14th rule, the DOS guidelines are not the same as DHS rules, but they are now very similar where as before public charge was a simpler hurdle to navigate this will certainly make it a lot more difficult and very confusing for people who have upcoming interviews since these changes are very rushed with little guidance.

 

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...