Jump to content

26 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Peru
Timeline
Posted

The  reason why the consulate may  be a little more lenient on a same-sex couple is that when reviewing a marriage-based visa, they  are considering whether the couple has a valid relationship consistent with local cultural norms for that kind of partnership. So, for heterosexual couples, they will often expect to see evidence of family support of the relationship through photos of the couple with both sides of the family, at the wedding (if married), etc. For a same-sex couple, local cultural norms may include concealing the relationship from one or both families, so the consulate would not expect to see the same kind of proof. That's not the case in your partnership (congrats), so the point is moot here,  but may be relevant to others. In terms of personal experience,  when my  husband and I had our interview in Lima there was an adorable female couple interviewing at the same time. The CO did not bat an eye  at either of us and both were approved with no problem.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Thailand
Timeline
Posted

Hi! 

 

Same sex couple here. Noom is from Thailand. We had no issues at all getting K1 approved. So long as you meet the K1 visa documented requirements to demonstrate a legitimate relationship you will be fine. Good luck! 

 

--David & Noom

N-400 Timeline

  • 2020.03.08 -- Naturalization filing window opened
  • 2020.03.09 -- N-400 filed and feed paid online
  • 2020.03.14 -- Email/Text notifications received that biometrics appt scheduled
  • 2020.03.14 -- NOA of case receipt received via USPS
  • 2020.03.20 -- Biometrics appointment notification received via USPS
  • 2020.03.30 -- Received email notification that biometrics appt scheduled for April 2 canceled due to Covid19
  • 2020.04.02 -- Biometrics scheduled for 1:00 PM canceled due to Covid-19
  • 2020.08.07 -- Myuscis update: biometrics being reused
  • 2020.08.14 -- NOA of biometrics reuse received via USPS
  • 2020.09.30 -- E-notifications received that interview has been scheduled
  • 2020.11.05 -- N-400 interview scheduled for 12:45 PM
  • 2020.11.05 -- Citizenship approved and oath administered! 

 

ROC Timeline

  • 2019.03.08 -- ROC 90-Day Filing Window Opened
  • 2019.03.08 -- Mailed 1-751 and G-1145 to Phoenix (via UPS)
  • 2019.03.12 -- 1-751 and G-1145 delivered to Phoenix (via UPS)
  • 2019.03.12 -- 1-751 official submission date
  • 2019.03.15 -- I-797 (NOA 1)  LIN=Nebraska Service Center
  • 2019.03.18 -- Text message notification received: file receipt confirmation || Check for application + biometrics fees processed
  • 2019.03.18 -- NOA1 received via USPS (18-month Green Card extension)
  • 2019.09.06 -- I-797C NOA Biometrics Appointment notice date
  • 2019.09.13 -- I-797C NOA Biometrics Appointment notice receive (via USPS)
  • 2019.09.20 -- Biometrics (walk in) … originally scheduled for 2019.09.26 @ 9:00 AM 
  • 2020.03.10 -- E-notification that interview appointment scheduled
  • 2020.03.16 -- Interview appt notification receive via USPS
  • 2020.04.14 -- Interview scheduled for 7:30 AM canceled due to Covid-19
  • 2020.05.22 -- App status updated "New Card Is Being Produced"  and will be mailed
  • 2020.05.22 -- App status updated "Case Approved"
  • 2020.05.26 -- I-797 NOA received via USPS Approval Notice
  • 2020.05.27 -- App status updated to "Card Was Mailed to Me"
  • 2020.05.28 -- App status updated to "Card Was Picked Up By The United States Postal Service"; USPS tracking app shows expected delivery date of June 1, 2020
  • 2020.05.29 -- Permanent Green Card received via USPS Priority Mail


AOS Timeline

  • 2016.12.30 -- AOS, EAD, and AP applications delivered to Chicago PO
  • 2017.01.21 -- NOA1's received via USPS for I-485 (AOS),  I-131 (AP), and I-765 (EAD)
  • 2017.02.24 -- Biometrics Appointment
  • 2017.04.20 -- AOS & EAD approved; NOA2's received via USPS on 2017.04.23
  • 2017.04.29 -- EAD & AP combo card received
  • 2017.06.06 -- AOS approved!
  • 2017.06.10 -- 2-YR Green Card received

 

K-1 Visa Timeline

  • 2016.04.18 -- I-129F Received by USCIS
  • 2016.04.20 -- I-129F NOA1
  • 2016.06.29 -- NOA
  • 2016.08.15 -- Bangkok Embassy received our case from NVC
  • 2016.08.23 -- Packet 3 sent to Embassy in Bangkok
  • 2016.08.26 -- Packet 4 email received from Embassy
  • 2016.09.05 -- Medical exam @ 10:30 AM @ BNH
  • 2016.09.07 -- Interview @ 7:30 AM...Visa approved
  • 2016.09.09 -- Visa Received
  • 2016.10.02 -- Entered USA (POE LAX)
  • 2016.11.18...Our Wedding Day 
Posted

Another same sex couple here. K1 visa was approved without issues.

 

The application is sort of a package and the supporting evidence is there to backup your story... as long as it makes it credible then you’re fine.

 

e.g. We lived together for years before my husband Returned to the US because of a job offer. Our K1 application has no photos because  we had evidence we had lived together (apartment lease, tax returns, pay slips), evidence we had traveled together ( tickets and boarding passes), evidence I had visited him in the US, etc.

 

You have to prove you have met and that the relationship is credible. if you have met recently then you need to show how you’re doing what new couples do... that’s when you need photos.

Posted
21 hours ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

Some of the basics that hetero couples need like pictures with family are not really needed or if the family knows of the relationship at all are two big things that they are more lenient on for same sex couples 

There is no "leniency" for same-gender couples. There is also no requirement whatsoever that you show pics with family for any couple. You just have to show that your relationship is legit given the context you live in. So an opposite-gender couple who eloped to get married cannot reasonably be expected to show pics with family.

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline
Posted

The VJ experience suggests there is, I have seen cases approved which I thought would be an issue, no scientific way of proving it either way.

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline
Posted

Different standard of proof.

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Posted
1 hour ago, afrocraft said:

There is no "leniency" for same-gender couples. There is also no requirement whatsoever that you show pics with family for any couple. You just have to show that your relationship is legit given the context you live in. So an opposite-gender couple who eloped to get married cannot reasonably be expected to show pics with family.

Actually there is especially in countries or regions where same sex marriages are very much against the cultural norm. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, afrocraft said:

That's not leniency. You're just taking into account their inability to provide certain discretionary documents because of their circumstances.

Which is leniency because if it were hetero couple they would have been denied but because they are same sex couple it is ok. Why are you intent on trying to disagree with everyone today?

Posted
On 10/5/2019 at 3:07 PM, Cyberfx1024 said:

Which is leniency because if it were hetero couple they would have been denied but because they are same sex couple it is ok. Why are you intent on trying to disagree with everyone today?

Drop the personal attack. I disagree with you because you're factually wrong.

 

Leniency would be a reduction in the standard of review or the burden of required documentation. There is no requirement for any applicant, straight or gay, to produce family pics. None whatsoever. The standard of review for all applications is a totality of the circumstances, so a reviewer considers the applicant's total context to decide the likelihood that they have a bona fide relationship.

  • Ryan H locked this topic
 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...